KaskadskyjKozak

As we all are. Speak for yourself. Actually, don't speak at all - STFU, nOOb.

The most telling line of this piece: Interestingly enough, devout believers and atheists alike point to the brain scans as proof of their own ideas. If people respond to your question, you'll likely see this play out.

Is that the problem??? Flash backs? the problem is a cranial-rectal inversion

Adam fucked Satan? Yes, Satan is clearly female

you misanthrope!

Dude, that Avatar is just plain wrong

From Wikipedia: Origin of name Idaho is the only state that was likely named as the result of a hoax (the so called "Idahoax"). In the early 1860s, when the United States Congress was considering organizing a new territory in the Rocky Mountains, eccentric lobbyist George M. Willing suggested the name "Idaho," which he claimed was derived from a Shoshone language term meaning "the sun comes from the mountains" or "gem of the mountains." Willing later claimed that he had made up the name himself[3][4]. Congress ultimately decided to name the area Colorado Territory when it was created in February 1861.

That's an idea.

I hiked up there in September a few years ago. It was fairly muddy. A fairly easy scramble, no routefinding issues, and no people. I wouldn't call the approach boring... but it was a hump in.

The dumbing down of America continues.

My kids' baseball league has abolished ALL SNACKS after games due to the .00001% with food allergies. LAME.

Snow King is an easy scramble. Remote with good views. The approach is longish though.

Really it probably K-fed dream, that why he has that pic. Dude...I know I am not one to talk, but you really need to prof read your statments before you hit the submit button. "Really it probably K-fed dream" I dont even know what you are saying here. Now you know how we feel when we read your posts.

The market is cyclical, and if you wait out a lull there will be supply at some point.

Im a lib and I say nuke the fuckers. What do you say to that? STFU, Kevboner.

That's quite a mouthful. Back to the initial number crunching. Somebody who makes $100K can definitely afford a sub-median home in this area. They should have bought a sub-median home in the past, and if so, could afford a super-median home today based on equity from their earlier purchase. A 350K mortgage is totally affordable for that income level. Add in 70-100K in equity and you are golden.

beer goes nicely with that too

damn i was afraid you were going to say that *sigh* I would ice it and take an anti-inflammatory... take that with a grain of salt - I'm not a Dr...

this reminds me of the entitlement thread. Just because the median is "high" doesn't mean the first-time home owner should be able to get in at that level. You can buy something more modest first, build up some equity, then buy a more expensive home/town-home/whatever a few years later.

1) Pictures of hot climbing chicks. 2) Kevbone being an idiot. That's the bulk of it.

EXACTLY. I remember another thread here where someone called someone else's wife a whore. Same deal; crossing over the line.

The error? I know what I make and have made over the years and what I've paid in taxes and it's nowhere near 14K/100K.

Have you ever owned? And filled in a 1040?