KaskadskyjKozak

and no pics of dead kids!

Nice tone - good imitation of the brown sound.

"Noone here gets out alive"

Nice one!! Where did you cross the 'schrund? From the photo below it looks like it goes "ear to ear" so to speak:

The story of your life

Kevbone don't need not stinking fluoride!

+1 howp fuhking thievs, thei brake theyr neks, klaunpuhncherz

I dont think it is up for an aurguement that it does or does not prevent tooth decay. The question is should the government force it on you? Yes they should. They should also force all you fatties to exercise. And wear a dog collar that shocks the piss out of you every time you try and cram some junk food down your pie hole. Holy Shit! Frieh and I actually agree on something. is it ok to be a fattie if you do exercise? i mean a lot. :-)

I believe it is up to the parents to teach their children about brushing their teeth. Not the governement. You probably believe that the governement should not be making kids get an education or learn how to spell too. Are you the "arbeiter" [sic] of spelling

I dont think it is up for an aurguement that it does or does not prevent tooth decay. The question is should the government force it on you? Yes they should. They should also force all you fatties to exercise. And wear a dog collar that shocks the piss out of you every time you try and cram some junk food down your pie hole. I bet you want boner to wear a dog collar... sicko.

"I am not surprised with the conclusions of this study. Just look at Barack Obama. He is about at wimpy looking as Michael Jackson and probably could not punch his way out of a brown paper bag."

Then Ivan would only have like 5 TRs.

Who said anything about "getting properly pissed". 2-3 beers is enough for a buzz, and according to new guidelines, a DUI. Rob: blow me.

Nicotine-stained fingers?

flip, flop

Can you find a chart of the increase in revenue the gov't plans to make off this plan to save lives? "the gov't" you mean, like each city and state's individual projected revenue increases from additional DUIs within their jurisdictions, combined into a single number? Do you think they're all in on it together??? OMG! How much do you think they're paying the NTSB? What's Obama's share? you can break it down however you want, Robbie - by state, by local jurisdiction, in the aggregate.

Can you find a chart of the increase in revenue the gov't plans to make off this plan to save lives?

Cool, Brett! Thanks for the great conditions update! That gully on Spontanaity sure looks more palatable with snow in it! See you this w/e!

So tragic. All this guy was doing was having quality time with his kid. :-( Condolences.

LOL, I know right?? Something smells ROTTEN!!! Bet they are afraid to show that data as it would undermine their agenda.

Curious that they don't have 0.05 - 0.08 then > 0.08 separately LOL

I'm not assuming anything, except that maybe it's *not* a grand conspiracy and that *maybe* there is something behind the vast corraborating research on the subject that took me about 30 seconds to find on the internet. I love how personally you take this stuff. Do you have more articles that you think do a better job proving how "rotten" this is? You just like being an annoying contrarian. Roger.

Was it that or stricter enforcement of laws? Checkpoints? Stiffer penalties? Don't assume causality. And I love how you read one article based on one report and believe everything in it! LOL

Um, this wasn't my logic at all. I believe my logic was that .05 seems like a reasonable limit, based on department of transportation studies on the effects of alcohol and driving (published by the CDC) and based on the current laws of most of other developed western nations. If you have data that indicates that .08 isn't actually that high, feel free to post up. But don't cry like a baby about it Read the article. They cite the # of accidents (in 10's of thousands) but fail to state what the BAC levels were for those accidents. Then make some vague assertion that they will "save" like 400-800 lives a year. I smell something rotten here.

Not if you shell out $10 for a microbrew. So, because you don't drink 2-3 drinks it should be illegal. Nice logic.