KaskadskyjKozak

That's the second time he's written that same racist line in a matter of weeks. indeed

One only needs to take a tally of your posts in response to mine. You just can't ignore me. Unfortunately.

Yeah, you're the sole reason why Porter posts, KKK. Nothing's funny to a drama queen with the sense of humor of a planarium (although planaria are pretty funny looking). Look at the bright side; you've now logged one credible statement in your posting history. Cheers. Hey, shit for brains: No. 13 posted this thread, not Porter. And 13's stalking of me pales in comparison to yours.

On a tangential note. What is up with organizations that collect toys for disadvantaged kids during the holidays and say they must be new and unwrapped? WTF? What about passing along used toys so they can be reused and delay tossing them into the landfills? I don't mean thrashed broken toys, but used stuff that is still decent?

That's why I say we gotta BURN IT ALL DOWN!!!1 Maybe the Canadians can help with that. They did a good job last time.

winner? loser? WTF, dude. it's a forum on the interwebs. discuss, spew, whatever, and move on.

Dude, look at who posted this thread. That's ALL he posts - attacks against conservatives and attacks against me. Nothing else. I'm pointing out that people like him, and his ilk are the same - apply some pseudo-outrage when it suits them. Obsessively. We've discussed Craig. Everyone has. Repeatedly. As for how "funny" this is. I don't think it's funny. Our political representatives are behaving in the most base manner and never acknowleding wrongdoing or mistakes. It's a reflection of our society. And it cuts across the political spectrum.

I give up. You refuse to acknowledge my point. Fine, so be it.

Absolutely it's newsworthy -- we should all hear about exactly these sort of things. Often. And, I'm not saying we should turn our backs and pretend it didn't happen. Maybe that's what KKKK is proposing, but not me certainly. I bet the voters kick his ass out next election (I would.) I guess I'm just saying he's just another piece of shit from D.C. so I'm not really surprised. Whether he stays or goes, another piece of shit will just replace him and be just as (or more) ineffectual. Fuck it, let's go climbing We've already heard about Craig's case. Ad nauseam. Everyone is aware of it.

....and you are telling me you don't feel like a hypocrite yourself when you say the above with Clinton in mind? No. Because it's part of my point. You guys do not apply your "indignation" or demands for morality equally. If you knew me, which you don't, you'd know I am fair. I apply the same standard across the board. I am not going to endure one-sided vindictiveness. In bringing up Clinton (so easy, since we are talking about interns), I have already proven my point - we have people making excuses for him, and why his case was different. It's close enough, my friend - consensual, but improper sex while in public office. The outrage should be the same. What I see instead is a cry for a pound of flesh in one case, and rationalizations and excuses in the other.

Do you feel the same way about clinton? Nah, he owned up in the end. This craig guy, I mean, COME ON. Does he think I'm a retard? Besides, dude -- a cigar. That's fuckin class. He owed up in the end? Come on, dude. There was a friggin cum stain - that's the only reason he owned up. And it took a hell of a lot to get to that point.

Hmm, I dunno. Personally, I think soliciting sex in a bathroom should be legal. Why not? And as to his anti-gay legislation double-speak, well...who knows? Maybe he's representing his constituents? Maybe he's all fucked up by religion and the anti-gay upbringing he inevitably received as a child, forever holding back his inner-gay at the risk of eternal damnation? Who knows. Should he lose his office cause he's a hypocrit? Well, we'd run out of senators pretty quick. Should he lose his office cause he tried to get a blowjob from an anonymous man in a bathroom stall (I'm assuming he's the pitcher)? Nah. Knock yerself out, buddy. Should the fine people of Idaho re-elect him? Well, there's the rub, and as I'm not a registered voter in Idaho, I will simply lean back on my general impression that all politicians are lying, steaming piles of shit (just like the rest of us). That way I'm not disappointed in the end. But is it newsworthy Rob? I realize you might not WANT to hear about that stuff happening (I know I don't, but I'm also not going to ignore it). We could just turn our backs on him and pretend like it didn't happen, I guess that is what you and KKKK are proposing. There are other things to consider other than your own personal viewpoints, such as the law. The law is the one thing we have that keeps the playing field level. It should be applied evenly whether it is President Clinton or a Senator Craig getting a BJ. There is the letter of the law, and there is there is just common decency. If Clinton got a BJ in private and Craig did it in public, well there is a difference there in legal terms. Its just too hard to legislate decency. I mean, you think having sex in public is fine (a public restroom is a public restroom). Its fine if you're the one getting some , but the bottom line is it is just one viewpoint in this country. Most people in this country will disagree with you. i won't ask you the question as to whether you would want your son or daughter interning for Craig, its obvious you wouldn't have them intern for anyone And what is the law in this case? I think he's already faced the legal consequences. Again, let's review that mantra circa 1998 and onwards: "It does not rise to the level of impeachment"

Do you feel the same way about clinton?

Hmm, I dunno. Personally, I think soliciting sex in a bathroom should be legal. Why not? And as to his anti-gay legislation double-speak, well...who knows? Maybe he's representing his constituents? Maybe he's all fucked up by religion and the anti-gay upbringing he inevitably received as a child, forever holding back his inner-gay at the risk of eternal damnation? Who knows. Should he lose his office cause he's a hypocrit? Well, we'd run out of senators pretty quick. Should he lose his office cause he tried to get a blowjob from an anonymous man in a bathroom stall (I'm assuming he's the pitcher)? Nah. Knock yerself out, buddy. Should the fine people of Idaho re-elect him? Well, there's the rub, and as I'm not a registered voter in Idaho, I will simply lean back on my general impression that all politicians are lying, steaming piles of shit (just like the rest of us). That way I'm not disappointed. It's a post like that which makes you the antithesis of a wing-nut Rob.

Your black heart spews vitriol. Your soul is in torment. And you know it.

Whether it's photographing women and posting their images without permission, or posting attacks against people's family members, you prove again and again that you have absolutely no decency or morality. You are an evil, petty little man, worth absolutely nothing.

I've noticed you acknowledging the other side's point of view on more than one occasion.

My problem is with you left wing nuts with your constant hypocritical use of your "politics of personal destruction". I've said it repeatedly. Once more, slowly: You guys dredge up the same names over and over and over again with the same lame attacks and mudslinging (Hey I can name 6 guys who were conservative and were gay, and so all conservatives are closet gays, blah blah blah). And at the same time you conveniently ignore the fact that at least an equal number of people have done similar or worse misdeeds who are not conservative, but like-minded people such as yourself. Nothing to see here folks, move along! Then when you are called on this, do you stop and actually consider the criticism, and maybe acknowledge it. Nope. So keep on with your bad selves. Just repeat over and over again a mind-numbing mantra of derisive foaming-at-the-mouth attacks against those whose politics you disagree with, and make yourself feel so much better about yourself. If you can dehumanize the "other side" effectively enough, why you have no time to look at "your side". Of course, it's the "other side" who is "extreme", "hypocritical" and "partisan", not you. Note: I am using a rhetorical not literal "you" here Porter, so don't get up in arms.

Actually, I didn't really laugh at that. It was just the fastest and most offensive thing I could google that I knew would get a reaction out of you. And to answer your question- actually yes. Martin Van Buren was a really shitty president. I'm glad that fucker is 6 feet under. OK, that was funny (Porter: take notes)

thank you, Rob, a sensible answer at last!

Not immediately. And like I said, he did far worse. Yeah, how about him? You guys dredge up the same half-dozen examples over and over and over again. Get a life. And Haggard is not a politician. There are plenty of liberals in private life doing all kinds of shit too. Maybe even you yourself are.

Another clueless fella who cannot distinguish homosexuality and pedophilia. you're the one who can't distinguish between public consensual sex and (potential) harassment of interns

gee, SS, do you laugh with equal contempt at any (dead) Democrats? thought not.