KaskadskyjKozak

No. Fuck off. Somebody is a little bit bitter.

i think climbing can act as an amplifier for the state of a relationship, good or bad. there's also: "Why are you going climbing w/ your buds but not climbing w/ me?" "Is it because I'm not good enough?" "Is it because you don't love me?" and "Why do you get to go climbing when I have to stay home to take care of [house/kids/dog/whatever]" and "When I'm sick you should stay home with me and take care of me instead of going climbing" ... shit, that sounds worse than marriage.

Listen to the talking heads on the news. It's all part of politics. Bush endorses McCain publicly, does some fundraising for him, etc. And McCain looks for ways to simultaneously distance himself from Bush. It was a game Gore played very poorly, helping him lose an election he should have won decisively.

it was a double entendre

horseback? how about snowmobile. then we'd be #1. :-)))

Like you ever *were* going to vote for McCain.

seems like a good idea to me. climbing girlfriends, that is.

OK. Good to know. $40 is indeed a good price.

I was just going to say... based on what he does with cigars, I don't know if I'd take a toke off of a doobie he handed me

It's just that I would think, given your fire and brimstone rantings when one single individual threatens to take a particular action, you might muster a little bit more than this meepish admonishment for a media demogogue inciting thousands of his followers to take the same action en masse. But hey, partisan hypocrisy's all in a day's work around here, right? whatever, dude - you are grasping for straws.

i agree though - he'd be fun to hang out and party with

how much did they cost you?

but he doesn't inhale.

That's it?! That's all? After all the storm and fury for two fucking days about a single individual treasonously bringing down the entire system! Visigoths and Vandals at the gates! Cunt! The end of democracy! After all that, this is what we're hearing? Hold on, I'm sorry, MaryLou of CC.com equals Rush Limbaugh? Nationally syndicated with a bully pulpit reaching millions of listeners, with the ability to mobilize thousands? Equals? If there was ever any doubt before that you two are the biggest wankers around, your "apology" cinches it. Thanks. 1) Rush isn't here. Marylou is. 2) Nobody is defending Rush here. Marylou was defending her actions, and others were supporting her. When everyone agrees, there's not much to say, now is there? The fact is you fucks were expecting FW and myself to be hypocrites and defend Rush. Sorry to disappoint you. Wrong is wrong, and Rush is no different than Marylou in this case.

do you really think he is a "marxist" who wants to establish a "marxist" government? i'm not so sure.... maybe we can ask him: hey prole, are you a "marxist" who wants to establish a "marxist" form of government here in the US? Cocoa, why are you trying to ruin my fun?

He needs to be waterboarded.

Which candidate would you pay the most to see stoned? I gotta go with Hilary on this one.

Guess you guys were bored with the primary results tonight.

nah, you're right, I was out of line. Shit, your bustin my balls over here, and we haven't even had a date yet We all say crazy shit here - it's Spray.

yer seemingly a pretty smart fellow, so i don't understand why you are missing the point so badly. Marx didn't so much have a good idea (as if his thoughts might be reduced to one idea); he had many ideas, and even more, he had many observations, ones that were cogent, perspicuous, insightful, and quite telling. again, try not to simply view marxism as a prescription to a malady, but rather an observation of events, for admittedly, it falls terribly short as a guide to behaviour. There's a profound difference between you and Prole. Your post indicates intelligence and critical analysis. He's just a fucking Marxist, which has less to do with a study of what Marx actually wrote and meant, and more to do with establishing a form of government which we've seen many times.

Of course I'm opposed to it - even if I never have a chance in hell of being that rich.

that again would be the misappropriated prescriptive side. see, there is a difference. byenow. yeah, yeah, Marxists had a good idea, it's the application that failed. But Prole wants to try again. Just one more time. The experiment has been tried enough, as documented in the reference above. Only a moron like Prole fails to see that. Unfortunately the world is full of Proles.

wow. harsh. antagonistic. very very angry. I'd say another tragedy is that there are people so stupid that they cannot see that "Marxism" was and is, for the thinking person, mainly descriptive, not prescriptive. it's an immensely rich avenue of inquiry and discourse. where i fall off is when people endorse its barely formed prescriptive theoretics, without acknowledging its tremendous short-comings and misapplications. Don't bother. wouldn't know a marxian analysis from a hole in the ground, much less what you're talking about. Pretend your writing for the History Channel or one of those little evangelical comic books. A little reading for you Prole. Choke on it.

the truth

...an oft quoted "middle passage" number that is utterly ridiculous. Anyone who believes this has big problems with not only math, but truth. Now is the part where you fall back on, "yea man, so what man, are you trying to say that four thousand, or forty thousand, or whatever, man, that that was ok? Is that what you're saying you right-wing bastard!!!!!! Huh???? That quarter-and-a-half you did at Whatcom Community College was just enough to make you a total dipshit without a fucking clue. The real tragedy is that anyone is so fucking stupid in the modern world to turn to Marxism considering the 100 million life body count that that failed philosophy has wrought on humankind in less than 100 years.