you seem to miss your own point - the spray-lectorate does indeed appear uneasy and unhappy - as unhappy as w/ iraq 8 years ago? no, but of course the circumnstances ARE different,
Yeah, the circumstances are "different" - a D is in the Whitehouse, so the volumes of shrill "outrage" is well, pretty much absent here. Pretty much my point.
You really can't see any other major differences? Please, you're not fooling me.
Many of the reasons given to oppose Bush's wars are true in this case as well. Or did you folks just not mean it?
"We don't belong there"
"No exit plan"
"We're hypocrites... no moral standing to decide how other countries should be run"
"Innocents will die"
"We'll lose American lives for nothing"
"It's all about oil... we need to get off of the foreign oil teat"
"We can't afford this war and our money is better spent at home"