KaskadskyjKozak

That's so retarded.

I'll take a couple of the sluts if you don't want them "Wanting" is not the issue - Mr. Small Hands wouldn't know what to do with them.

From what I've seen of the images of the celebrations, it looks like the revelers are almost all your typical white, fratboy types that'd be screaming "WHOOO...YEAHHH!!!" at the top of their lungs in exactly the same manner whether it was for Osama being killed or for some inebriate showing her tits. "From what I've seen..." = through your idiotic, shit-colored glasses. Thus, the conclusions you draw are irrelevant. FOAD.

Our approach (we have 3 boys) was to start the kids on easy hikes that they could do part of, then work up to harder, more ambitious hikes. When the kids were very young (2-3) they could do 1-2 miles of a trail like Lake 22 (Mountain Loop Highway) or Rattle Snake Ledge (I-90), and I'd carry them the rest of the way. Once they hit 40-45 lbs then the hikes had to be almost all done under their power - say Colchuck Lake by age 5 (I carried one son up about 500 foot vertical on that). If you work them up this way they'll be able to get up Granite Mountain, Hidden Lake Peaks, Ingalls Lake etc by age 7-9. Mount Saint Helens is not much beyond that. Good luck!

Muy bueno Gaucho! :-)

Quit while you are behind, my friend. :-)

It was a pleasure finally meeting the great Ivan, although, based on your stature, I will consider you more as a Piotr Velikiy than an Ivan Groznyj in my mind henceforth.

clowns are scary

or in my case a fat fuck even if I do walk it. :-)

LOL. Irony. j_b is so above the fray.

because you are his intellectual equal.

nOOb!

+1

and cutting programs. both.

You sure talk about this kind of stuff a lot Ivan. Just saying wish i could take the credit for that wonderful bit of dark poetry I bet you're from Texas, or named Lawrence...

the ticks are horrible - everyone should stay away ;-)

You sure talk about this kind of stuff a lot Ivan. Just saying

Cool, we can agree on something: estamos fudidos.

Does anybody? true, Jay's weaving has just gotten particularly irksome lately. like your "double taxation bollocks" now that you think it should be treated like income are you ever happy?

Does anybody?

i neither throw my hands up nor pick the simplest course of action in a moment - i don't mind and frequently do discuss details ad nasuem, and just point out eventually its time to stfu and DO somethign other than bitch back and forth - my sense of "tax the rich" is a broad one, and really, not divorcing myself from the group to pitch in - fuck, as a public employee, for years now i've acquiesced w/o excessive complaint to no small amount of sacrifice for the Greater Good - end exemptions, increase marginal rates, thresholds, whatever, just bring more cash in and jesus-fuck, quit spending inordinately on dipshit stuff like the maintainence of a global empire Does anyone know the history of cap gains taxes? I am too lazy to look myself. :-) And why are there only 2(?) brackets? Seems the structure of cap gains taxes (progressive) could/should be closer to that of income, no?

just don't drop any c-bombs and you'll be fine

Picking a simple course of action (tax the rich more) because it "feels like the right thing" is just as bad as "throwing up one's hands" (which nobody said to do, actually, but, hey manufacture the position of others who disagree with you anyways - a tactic you are fond of) Gov't can always grow and spend more than they currently are. There is a limit as to how much you can tax the rich, and any proposal's benefit actually needs to be evaluated for efficacy (i.e. impact on the 1.65 trillion dollar deficit). But hey, pontificate some more, throw out the term "sociopath" a few hundred times more and talk about how smart you are and dumb everyone else is.