olyclimber

dropped the little guy off at his first day of school today. damn, this is going by fast.

Here is a for the kids:

Ideal Ropeup conditions are rapidly approaching. 38 days.

santa does too minxy winxy

climbed tatoosh with hansel on monday. fun stuff. climbing did not relign my spine as i hoped it would, but it was a nice afternoon. sky showed up with the other crazy dude who skied lib ridge with him recently. it was rad. alpinfox was there too. and his gf. a good time was had by all.

fuck'n aye. that guy is ugly.

wow...awesome climbing craig!

I recently taught an 80 hour Nordic Pole Walker class...but calling it Nordic Pole Walking just shows what gumbies you guys are. Its called trekking, and if you're just catching onto it now, you obviously have your head firmly entrenched in the sand. I upgraded the suspension on my Leki's for extreme downhill trekking, so I can grab big error with a cush ride. Good luck wanderfreunds!

Awesome, glad that campground became available this is going to be fun.

"Oly's friend (?) 2 kids, age/gender ?" <---this is actually Skeezix.

http://www.stereophile.com/recordingofthemonth/904/

Also, cc.com should have a tank-thong for sale soon.

yeah, whatever http://www.villagevoice.com/music/0326,frere-jones,45021,22.html

How the West Was Won I just discovered this new band, Led Zeppelin. You should check them out.

back/butt dimples

damn, that is a bummer. that guy was crazy.

http://www.sportsshooter.com/news/675

But I bow to your superior debating skill and off to play with the kid before he starts his first day school. Have a good one Fairweather.

"facts" i did mention that the methodology they used is suspect. read the report yourself, and how they responded to the criticism....I'm sure you agree that the NRA is a "centrist" org, right?

I have only done the Beckey, so I'm only half qualified to answer, but if you do that one, do the variation in the Kearney guide. Aethetically, the Stanely route does seem pretty nice, as it follows a pretty cool line (including the chockstone pitch), but you really couldn't go wrong with either of them, IM (half educated)O.

My "part 24" title simply mocks the fact that this subject has come up here many, many times before. Nothing more, Mr knee-jerk administrator. Page 1, Chapter 1 of the Conservative Talking Points Handbook: Keep saying it over and over again till you believe it is actually true. Others will too.

IS A WANK.

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2534 "This approach is based on the problematic notion that politicians cite the think tanks that they most agree with rather than the ones whose citation will be the most politically effective—a problem the researchers acknowledge when they attempt to explain away some curious anomalies that their method produces. (The National Rifle Association comes out as a centrist group; the Rand Corporation turns out to be left-leaning.)" but the koolaid does taste good.

those are the liberal talking points. now lets hear the conservative talking points.

Part what? That is a common tactic: using previously stated "facts" which have been either disproven or proven unreliable....so now we are on part XXIV! Wow! It must be true! You of course need this hyperbole to distract from the actual statement being made. 1. Hmmm....care to guess on the voting record of the authors of this "study"? 2. Their measurement methodology is unreliable. You find data to support anything if you already know what your results are when you start looking. 3. They are clearly out of step of with the speaking points. They are currently supposed to be calling anyone who who is critical of the current administration "Nazi sympathsizers".