Jump to content

j_b

Members
  • Posts

    7623
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by j_b

  1. j_b

    RIP Compay Segundo

    for samples: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B00000AEE4/ref=ase_afrocubawebA/103-4490993-5495858?v=glance&s=music
  2. there you go. you knew the answer all along. spooning with a partner with high metabolism is the key. forget the bivi gear.
  3. j_b

    funnies (for libs)

    cartoons are traditionally the last refuge of a critical press. the recent past is certainly no exception. this guy is good: http://www.markfiore.com/animation/rules.html hit next for more.
  4. j_b

    meet the fall guy?

    iain is a don man?
  5. j_b

    meet the fall guy?

    wut? you don't think george is plab. check out that pic again!
  6. j_b

    meet the fall guy?

    http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/07/11/sprj.irq.wmdspeech/index.html
  7. wow! i am with VB all the way. celebrating life in your own way is the important thing here. Ryland, it sounds like your only problem is having your girlfriend accept your way of dealing with a great loss.
  8. mt. louis is great. nice looking corner sayjay. that's for sure. i barely trust most cams in limestone and i downright do not trust small cams. have you ever had the experience of repeatedly yanking out cams when testing them ..... mt. louis limestone opened my eyes.
  9. i have the hardest time thinking of a worse climb. it is nothing exceptional by cascades standard but i'd go with the NE Butt. of North 3 fingers. terrible bushwack on the approach, several hundred feet of vertical trees to begin with, wet (running water) and slabby gully (no pro, therefore 4th class), etc ... we bailed .
  10. what? i think this is a great pitch, even if a little short. it has great rock, requires good technique, takes good pro, and yet still scares most people ( ). i only wish it was twice as long, then it'd be a classic. funny, how such differing opinions about climb worthiness can coexist.
  11. j_b

    further evidence ...

    did not need inspectors to find that out. we and our allies sold them the technology and the materials no the UN pulled them out after they were accused of spying there was plenty of direct evidence that most of the arsenal had been destroyed during prior inspections. testimony to that effect by defectors, un inspectors, etc ... was systematically expunged from intelligence documents like which predictions? that this administration had either no clue or only pretended it'd be a 6 months walk in the park to sell the war to the public? let an entity with greater credibility with the local folks (i.e. one that did not support said regime in the first 15years of its existence) deal with the problem no, ex-ambassador wilson says it very well: "What they did is they made that decision and then they backfilled it with whatever they could come up with to justify the war they had decided to make." and now there is plenty of evidence that they knew the backfill to be false. with ari leaving you should apply for the spinmeister job
  12. j_b

    further evidence ...

    just watch, congress is committed to denying the truth
  13. only in subaerial setting
  14. j_b

    further evidence ...

    any shit taken from you too morons should be proudly worn as a badge of honor
  15. j_b

    further evidence ...

    http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/americas/view/43929/1/.html
  16. good point Ade. i should have been more cautionary with my comment.
  17. j_b

    Tyler Hamilton

    very impressive. he started and finished today's stage even though he has a broken collarbone. how many more days can he take the pain?
  18. poor little AK
  19. i am not sure how this'd fit in your plan but if you do the full north ridge approaching from goat pass, you certainly would not need boots or ice axe.
  20. j_b

    Extreme weather

    not anymore.
  21. j_b

    Extreme weather

    These kinds of studies are dangerous. Let me say I do beilieve in anthropogenic climate change. But the extreme events arguement is dubious. How much more weather data do we have not then 1960. There weren't even weather sattalites then. I thikn I remember reading that the whole of scientific knowledge double every 10 years. So we would expect something like 5-10 times the number of extreme events now then 40 years ago. How many of those houses on mt. lemmon in AZ were there in 1960. Probably not many. There will be millions in insurance claims for them. 40 years ago there would not have been. There are also a lot more people and structures to insure now too. i agree that using insurance data to make the point is not straight forward. but as explained in the paragraph quoted, despite accounting for inflation and the increase in number of insured property, "the trend cannot be explained away". yet i am sure this use of insurance data will remain controversial. it is true that scientific knowledge increases rapidly but there are regions of the world where the record of extreme weather events is well established because of the loss in human lives and destruction of property. it is at least the case in western europe and other industrialized nations where for the past ~150 years people have lived in flood plains, etc ... although the detailed data set is not very large yet, all studies (mostly modeling up to this wmo report) that i am aware of point in the same direction: a large increase in extreme climatic events. here is the original wmo press release: Geneva, 2 July 2003 - Record extremes in weather and climate events continue to occur around the world. Recent scientific assessments indicate that, as the global temperatures continue to warm due to climate change, the number and intensity of extreme events might increase, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) states in a press release issued today. In June, record high temperatures were recorded across southern France, with maximum temperatures exceeding 40°C in parts of southwest France. This resulted in June average temperatures of 5 to 7°C above the long-term average. In Switzerland, the month of June was the hottest in at least the past 250 years, according to environmental historians. In Geneva, since 29 May, maximum daytime temperatures did not drop below 25°C, making June the hottest June on record for the city. In the United States, there were 562 tornados during May, which resulted in 41 deaths. This established a record for the number of tornados in any month. The previous monthly record was 399 tornados in June 1992. In the eastern and southeastern part of the US, wet and cold conditions prevailed for well over a month. Weekly negative temperature anomalies of –2°C to –6°C were experienced in May while precipitation excesses, ranging from 50 mm to 350 mm over a period of more than 12 weeks starting in March 2003, have been recorded. In India, this year’s pre-monsoon heat wave brought peak temperatures of between 45°C and 49°C which correspond to weekly temperature departures from the normal of +2 to +5°C. At least 1400 people died in India due to the hot weather. In Sri Lanka, heavy rainfalls from Tropical Cyclone 01B exacerbated already wet conditions, resulting in flooding and landslides and killing at least 300 people. The infrastructure and economy of southwestern Sri Lanka was heavily damaged. A reduction of 20-30% is expected for the output of low-grown tea in the next three months. These record extreme events (high temperatures, low temperatures and high rainfall amounts and droughts) all go into calculating the monthly and annual averages which, for temperatures, have been gradually increasing over the past 100 years. New record extreme events occur every year somewhere in the globe, but in recent years the number of such extremes have been increasing. According to recent climate change scientific assessment reports of the joint WMO/UNEP Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the global average surface temperature has increased since 1861. Over the 20th century the increase has been around 0.6°C. This value is about 0.15°C larger than that estimated by the previous reports. New -2- analyses of proxy data for the Northern Hemisphere indicate that the increase in temperature in the 20th century is likely to have been the largest in any century during the past 1000 years. It is also likely that, in the Northern Hemisphere, the 1990s were the warmest decade and 1998 the warmest year. While the trend towards warmer globally averaged surface temperatures has been uneven over the course of the last century, the trend for the period since 1976 is roughly three times that for the past 100 years as a whole. Global average land and sea surface temperatures in May 2003 were the second highest since records began in 1880. Considering land temperatures only, last May was the warmest on record. The influence of El Niño and La Niña on these extreme events is in general undefined. The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and its Members, the National Meteorological and Hydrological Services along with various research institutes, will continue to organize research and document the influence of El Niño and other large scale climate phenomena on climate extreme events.
  22. j_b

    Extreme weather

    we are talking worldwide trend. some specific examples may differ from the general rule. i don't know. it depends whether the eyesore is very important, whether birds are affected, whether there are alternative sites providing less impact (offshore, etc ..), and on.
  23. j_b

    Extreme weather

    http://www.climatechangesolutions.com/english/science/weather.htm "It is therefore significant that data collected by insurance companies show a striking 30-year global trend in extreme weather. Comparing the figures for the 1960s and the 1990s, the number of great natural catastrophes (mostly floods and storms) has risen three-fold, and the associated economic losses have grown by a factor of nine (after adjusting for inflation). Even though more people today live in vulnerable areas and own more property that can be damaged, the trend cannot be explained away."
  24. j_b

    Extreme weather

    j_b, what part of that did I misunderstand? All I can figure is that some cub reporter looking for sensationalism put spin on the release. It happens all the time in our mainstream press with medical findings. New England journal publishes findings, New York Times spins and overplays the story. "New record extreme events occur every year somewhere in the globe, but in recent years the number of such extremes have been increasing."
  25. j_b

    Extreme weather

    true enough, though now they are building huge windmills offshore in northern europe. here is another method: http://www.planetark.org/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/19284/story.htm
×
×
  • Create New...