Jump to content

Roger

Members
  • Posts

    429
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Roger

  1. well golly what a good point! lobbying your state legislator sounds way more satisfying than throwing a molotov cocktail at a hummer. where is the COBRA COMMANDER anyway? I miss that guy.
  2. diverse. more 80's new-age jazz than one might expect... equal amounts radiohead and michael hedges. I'm wondering about some of the one-song bands, like jane's addiction and van halen. I'll guess "jane says" and "runnin' with the devil."
  3. you just don't get it foraker. must be one of them elite smarty-pants lazy liberal hypocrites with educational credentials and a "cushy" lifestyle, like all those school teachers who are making $33k/year. anyway, regarding your halliburton question, here's all you need to know: corporations = good government = bad (unless trying to impose certain religious beliefs, then good).
  4. this poll proves that there are only 25 actual people on cc.com, and the rest are avatars. um.. squid... that's not the nipple...
  5. that would probably make you private sector... unless you're a sovereign nation-state. as for me, private. no teat suckling going on here.
  6. Roger

    nutrition question

    even Pat Buchanan loves that specialed cream rinse...
  7. wouldn't they have had probable cause to pull him over independent of the speeding based on his previous behavior, and the fact that they just watched him load five suitcases in his truck from a known drug dealer?
  8. nope - sounds like it was a way to pay off some serious debt, and keep up the lifestyle... Oregonian article
  9. not to mention the link to a horse breeding business in his signature line... wow.
  10. Dude, ballsy route. The place where you traversed the SW col (just past the upper reservoir at 450') is usually overrun by aggressive unleashed retrievers. Although, you probably didn't have much risk of frisbeefall that time of day. Nice work!
  11. riiiight... then he drank six cases of beer and pissed his way out of an avalanche.
  12. I guess you could call it undermining the judiciary, but not exactly usurping "democracy," since the FDR proposal would have required approval by Congress, which didn't happen, despite the fact that the Ds had the run of the place (indicative of how bad an idea it was). One could argue that FDR's point with the court-packing proposal was that democracy was actually being undermined by the Court, because new laws enacted by a majority of the people's elected representatives were consistently being ruled unconstitutional in 5-4 decisions by conservative justices. Ironically, back in the 1930s the conservative jurists were the "activists."
  13. The posts have been tallied, and as of this thread our young friend NOLSe has officially taken more shit on this board than scot'agonia. Impressive!
  14. Roger

    Send it!

    hey what's the problem with you guys... this must be that "funny schtick" we keep hearing so much about! Damn, that's some funny schtick.
  15. no doubt! made even worse when you are wearing the mid-weight windshirt when you only need the silkweight, thereby adding another 1.2 oz.
  16. Really? To me it reads like his typical result-driven theorizing based on unquantifiable "facts" molded to reach a conclusion in line with his personal ideology, which in this case is no more complex than "I don't like those guys 'over there', and desperately want to be part of this cc.com-haters club posing as a climbing website."
  17. cheaper than Beckey? The siege of summitpost.com was hilarious... maybe not an award-winner, but a classic example of cc.com in action.
  18. did I miss something?
  19. or "extremely hard very severe" in the UK.
  20. damn doc, you used to be highly entertaining... did you fuck up and get a job or something?
  21. Roger

    Dirtbag Tm?

    maybe, but not regarding the t-shirt, which could only theoretically be protected by trademark, not copyright. Don't bother responding to him... pm me if you want.
  22. further evidence that you meddling moderators are unneccessary...!
  23. somebody miss their nap today?
  24. thanks. ummmm... right, okay... so now what were we talking about again?
×
×
  • Create New...