allthumbs

[ 09-19-2002, 03:28 PM: Message edited by: trask ]

Who's laughing? Perplexed maybe, but not laughing. You're from New York, right?

quote: Originally posted by Necronomicon: I wonder how many Iraqis have developed cancer from all the depleted Uranium ordance we shot off over there? How about US GIs, for that matter? How does that differ from a "weapon of mass destruction" such as a nerve agent? Aren't chemical weapons banned under the Geneva Convention? Who the fuck cares at this point? If I had a fly swatter and you had wings, you'd be smooshed on the wall right now.

-female -hooters -tight ass -long legs -athletic -small, oh I'm sorry, wrong thread. My bad.

One word for piece of mind -- Rosie

Here's one for you Krazy

comatose

Pussy

I like it!

thank you mtn. goat, you can finish your lunch now

WTF...the sounders...those fags kicking that little ball around...boohooo

Dru, I contend that the North Pole is Santa Country. You canadians can tax the hell out of it, but that still doesn't make it yours. The only reason canada isn't part of the United States is because we gave you Quebec and all dem Frenchies.

he's not canadian you tool, he's arctic

Mitch --

I'll pass on the Heffers. I gotta date with SK.

Holly Shit -- Capt. Caveman and Allison are dating now? WTF?

I love me

maybe you have the dreaded wanker disease. [ 09-19-2002, 11:30 AM: Message edited by: trask ]

DEERFIELD BEACH, Fla. (AP) -- A man dashing across a lake on a customized personal watercraft at about 55 mph was killed in an apparent collision with a flying duck. .... sorry, I couldn't help myself

Allison, you're baying at the moon. Last I saw Cavey he was getting a body shampoo and Korean massage up on 164th.

you rotten crotch

After reading Bush's UN speech, I realized what was really at stake with regard to Iraq. By not forcing Saddam to fulfill what he agreed to do by the terms of surrender ending the Gulf War, the United Nations will be nothing more than a 21st century League of Nations. Its resolutions would be de facto null and void. Bush has now committed the United States to taking on Iraq for the sake of the UN's legitimacy and that of the international order it represents. This is ironic, for here we have a president whose political party looks at the UN as a useless and wasteful socialist gab fest to now be willing to shed American blood to save its future. But the irony doesn't end there. Bush's critics, in the name of the UN and the multilateralism it represents, have accused him of "unilateralism"! So we have the possibility of America having to act alone in order to defend the international order while the rest of the world in a multilateral effort does nothing. Irony aside, I realize now that Bush is right about Iraq, and he is taking the right approach. And I now see the true connection to the war on terrorism: Saddam and bin Laden, like Hitler and Stalin before them, are equal threats to the world order, regardless of whether they have anything to do with each other. They are an axis of evil by default. I feel as if we are back in the 1930's, staring at the "high noon of aggression" as Paul Johnson called it in his book Modern Times. Only this time it isn't Baldwin, Chamberlain, Roosevelt, Blum, and Daladier facing Hitler and Stalin; it's someone who like Winston Churchill knows what do and why it needs to get done. We have allowed this dance with Saddam to go on for 12 years. Let's stop the music, and let slip the dogs of war. Anonymous

heartless bastard

pink is your color dru

Yur nasty--I ain't talkin to you.