Fairweather

Huh? Um...no...are you kidding? The Crossroads-Baker test is part of the historical record. I know you're upset about all the goats that were killed, but it in no way represents advocacy for the assassination of an individual.

If Bush, or any future president is assassinated, "funny" pictures like the one you posted will be regarded as part of the enabling process. I guess I just don't think you're funny. Please try to think of things beyond your all-consuming hatred of our president.

Nice try. Your unmatched ability to weave Bush hatred into every word you write here denies you the right to now claim you were simply posting simile. Regardless, you should consider how posting a picture of an American President in the cross hairs of a rifle scope promotes a positive dialog in any way, shape, or form.

Oh, you must have mistaken my hyperbolic statement about slapping No13's head for true intent.

Oh, that's right...Dr Flash "apologized" for his comments - privately if I recall - so all was made well. Are you really gonna let No13's rifle scope picture stand?

Since you've only been around these parts since '06, it's understandable that you've missed a few things. Feel free to search out the threads on your own. Dr Flash Amazing suggested "putting a couple rounds into Bush's head" a few years back. Tvashtarketena espoused this sentiment almost verbatim more recently. Viendra7 has expressed similar wishes on multiple occasions.

BTW, Porter, Huckabee is a fucking idiot. Romney is a member of a cult. Neither of them would beat Obama or Hillary in a general election.

You need your fuckin' head slapped, 13. Clever that the author of your photo doesn't draw a bead on the presidents head like most of your buddies would. I guess he's already heard that knock on his door? No matter; you don't hunt pheasant with a rifle and scope, and you certainly don't "capture" anyone with the same. Yes - we all know President Bush was reading to children when he found out about the terrorist attacks. Do you really have anything to add? The moderators here seem very concerned about "scaring people away" from this site with hostile dialogue, but they give death wish/threats against the president and shit like yours a pass time after time. Unreal.

Then at least stick to a related thread. The hatred you have woven into every thread of your being manifests itself on every thread here. Frankly, it's tiresome. Grow up.

Geeeezz, boy. Give it a rest once in a while.

I'm 5'9" and about 165lbs - well, I was last summer anyhow. My "old" setup is 180cm "Fischer Tour Extremes" - which are basically a straight ski about 70mm at the waist. Mounted with Silvretta 404's. For my new setup, I went down to a 167cm K2 Shuksan - 2007 model. They're soft enough (and I'm heavy enough) that they still carve well despite the shorter length. Refusing to join the cult of Fritschi, had them mounted with Silvretta Pure Freerides and I absolutely love them. Plenty of torsional rigidity. Got the Shuksan's new on ebay for $180, and the Silvrettas new on ebay for $220 with brakes. Not bad. FWIW; I ski the pre 2006 model Garmont Adrenalins. (I DO use them for alpine too) I hear they softened them up after that year, so I would go with the stiffer Endorphin for 2008. As far as your question goes, I've heard that the Mt Baker is rather unresponsive. The Shuksan was once the industry standard and even now balances weight and performance - but the jury is still out for me I guess. I've heard good things about the G3 Baron and the BD Kilowatt too. Also, don't rule out a soft/light pair of alpine skis. The old Volkl G2's were supposed to be a good A/T ski, and I've seen a few skiers out on Solomon Pocket Rockets. (?WTF?) My 2 cent. Here's a question for Feck: Is flotation purely a function a total ski surface area? ie: shorter/fatter floats as well as longer/skinny surface contact area being equal? I call upon your experience and math/physics knowledge to settle this ongoing argument I'm having with my brother.

I'm glad you have a lot of time on your hands. Some don't.

I can think of at least 3 cc.com'ers who have stated otherwise. Two of them are right here on this thread.

I find her advocacy of the death penalty for tax cheats refreshing, the idea of asset seizure for anyone posessing over $100k in assets tempting, and the forcible redistribution of mcmansions pandering of the best sort. Your extra constitutional ideas should render you ineligible to vote. Rodham/Clinton has not proposed any such ideas.

His other shortcomings notwithstanding, Bush's tax cuts were and remain good economic policy. Tell me, Hugh, what are Madame Hillary's thoughts on capital gains?

MTBE Fire Retardant Pajamas Margarine ...and now add Fluoride to the growing list of do-gooder activism projects gone bad.

Holy shit! I checked out their website and found a few more priceless one-liners: http://www.findmespot.com/ Good find, builder.

I was drivin a hella new Subaru too. Prolly would have gotten off hella scott free if I'da been in my hella 4b'4 pickup them parts fur shur ummm hmmm. Hella nice snow from last night for about 1 hour, then hard rain all day. Hella heavy shit to try out my new AT setup. + = hella lame.

Hella raining at White Pass today. Hella top-to-bottom. Hella speeding ticket just east of Randle. $144 hella WSP in an SUV.

Moderators, could you please verify that I have not sent any PM's to Tvash - much less pictures of his ex-wife's "bung". No matter how hard she begs, I'm just not into that.

Why...I mean...we're like...totally never gonna use it for anything... sickie

In the end, my will is always done, my little hamsters.

.