Dechristo Posted June 1, 2009 Posted June 1, 2009 Then, these guys were the height of creative and unique Pop music. from Wikipedia: "The album was released on 1 June 1967 in the United Kingdom and the following day in the United States. Sgt. Pepper is often described as The Beatles' magnum opus and recognized as one of the most influential albums of all time by prominent critics and publications. It was ranked the greatest album of all time by Rolling Stone in 2003." Side One 1. "Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band" 2:02 2. "With a Little Help from My Friends" 2:44 3. "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds" 3:28 4. "Getting Better" 2:47 5. "Fixing a Hole" 2:36 6. "She's Leaving Home" 3:35 7. "Being for the Benefit of Mr. Kite!" 2:37 Side two 8. "Within You Without You" (George Harrison) 5:05 9. "When I'm Sixty Four" 2:37 10. "Lovely Rita" 2:42 11. "Good Morning Good Morning" 2:41 12. "Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (reprise)" 1:18 13. "A Day in the Life" 5:33 Quote
MarkMcJizzy Posted June 2, 2009 Posted June 2, 2009 Funny, how the Beatles chose June 1 to release this album. They must have known that in only twelve years, the Seattle Supersonics would win their one and only world championship on the very same day. Quote
ivan Posted June 2, 2009 Posted June 2, 2009 ever notice how all great albums still gotta have one song that sucks? "she's leaving home" is the example from this'un Quote
MarkMcJizzy Posted June 2, 2009 Posted June 2, 2009 ever notice how all great albums still gotta have one song that sucks? "she's leaving home" is the example from this'un ever notice how all great threads have one poster that sucks? dude, that's you Quote
Mal_Con Posted June 2, 2009 Posted June 2, 2009 Ever notice how most popular albums for the last 42 years only have 2 or 3 songs that don't suck. Quote
ivan Posted June 2, 2009 Posted June 2, 2009 ever notice how all great albums still gotta have one song that sucks? "she's leaving home" is the example from this'un ever notice how all great threads have one poster that sucks? dude, that's you you liking that song explains alot about you cumgargler you probably like "feedback" on "live dead" too... Quote
Doug Posted June 2, 2009 Posted June 2, 2009 Wow, 42 freakin' years?!?!? And it's still a great record. Ivan, go downstairs to your kitchen clutching your handkerchief..... Quote
ivan Posted June 2, 2009 Posted June 2, 2009 Wow, 42 freakin' years?!?!? And it's still a great record. Ivan, go downstairs to your kitchen clutching your handkerchief..... might as well have been 420 years ago - waaaaaay before my time - i still remember the first time i heard it - wans't until i was 19 - completly changed the stupid opinion i'd formed about the beatles fo'shizzle danced w/ my wife at my wedding to "when i'm 64" Quote
Peter_Puget Posted June 2, 2009 Posted June 2, 2009 I've always liked the Beatles and have several compilation discs that are always in one of my cars. All my Beatles albums are stored on my server so I rarely think of "albums" anymore and it wasn't until I read the track listing in the OP that I realized I have completely ignored this album on all my compilations. Maybe it’s the result of 42 years of constant airplay....... Quote
STP Posted June 8, 2009 Posted June 8, 2009 So, the BBC banned three songs from the album citing drug references in each song. These songs are Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds, A Day in the Life, and Being For the Benefit of Mr Kite. They didn't ban With a Little Help from my Friends ("I get high with a little help from my friends") or even Lovely Rita ("when are you free to take some T with me") though McCartney being British was most likely talking about drinking tea. Drug references? Judge for yourself: [video:youtube]A7F2X3rSSCU [video:youtube]vh8_l-5mAdg Quote
geoff Posted June 8, 2009 Posted June 8, 2009 BBC should have banned the entire thing - 'cause it sucks. Quote
ivan Posted June 8, 2009 Posted June 8, 2009 BBC should have banned the entire thing - 'cause it sucks. geoff killed jesus too Quote
Dechristo Posted June 8, 2009 Author Posted June 8, 2009 (edited) BBC should have banned the entire thing - 'cause it sucks. No, the BBC, when banning anything, simply state, "we've already got one...and it's quite nice." yes, yes, portrayed as a French knight, but it's from the mind of a Brit. Edited June 8, 2009 by Dechristo Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.