Jump to content

WTF IS WRONG WITH THESE PEOPLE


RuMR

Recommended Posts

I am not a live and let live person. I do not believe in cultural relativism. When people are doing something wrong, I agree that others have the right to step in and make them stop doing it. So, for example (using this one b/c I am lazy and I think most people are aware of it and agree with it), when a whole religion still focuses on oppressing women to the degree this one does (yes, even the "moderate" believers do this), I am against it.

 

Sure, I am against the fundamentalists in our own country who do this as well (fundamental Mormon church is my favorite target); but I do believe it is quite obvious women here have it way better than women in the middle east. And when one person is oppressed, we are all oppressed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 247
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If you had any first hand experience in what your pretend to be talking about, you might have a bit more credibility. You don't, so it's just spray.

 

Live and let live does not imply living with injustice, obviously. It does mean not giving in to uninformed hate mongering, however. That's something you might work on a bit. You're easily swayed.

 

Kicking the Taliban's ass (temporarily) was necessary. Fighting over 200 million practitioners of a religion you have a child's understanding of is not.

Edited by tvashtarkatena
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You really don't know much about the folks on this site. There are ones who won't fess up here (and I greatly respect that) about their direct experience with exactly what we are talking about. I also have no need to justify exactly how I came to know and believe what I do to you. It is easy for you to try to undermine me rather than try to undermine what I say. It makes me feel sorry for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't met many muslims. I knew one guy from Saudi Arabia who was an exchange student. He was a complete asshole, but I don't think that was because of his religion. He must have had a tiny dick or something, cause he compensated by acting like a huge one.

 

I worked with another guy who was islamic. He was a nice guy, but didn't let his wife drive. That's pretty much all I know about him.

 

Maybe it's not fair to blame islam for the mysogeny of its followers; it's probably best to blame the followers themselves. After all, in the end people need to be responsible for their own actions.

 

Personally, I think religion is primitive. But, that's just me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

One of my childhood friends was a muslim. Two things that I remember distinctly:

 

1) He told me that he was playing with matches one day and threw a couple at his sister (lit). She told his father. The father told my friend that if he did it again, he would cut off my friend's hand. Yes, that's part of the muslim "tradition".

 

2) During an assembly in 5th grade, my friend passed out and fell on some bleachers and banged his head hard. Turns out he passed out due to hunger. It was Ramadan and he had to fast all day. He was 11.

 

And I've known quite a few other muslims since then.

 

This post is a response to Rob and Archie. I really don't care what Trashcanlicker thinks about this topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I reject the moral pretense used to justify blatant aggression if only because these very same people waging the wars are opposed to even paying lip service to racial/gender equality and human rights in any other context except the muslim one."

 

1)You seem to be equating criticism and condemnation with aggression.

 

2)Even if one accepts your closing proposition at face value (who is the one doing the essentializing here, exactly?), this argument seems to rest on something along the lines of "Anyone who fails to support living wage legislation is in *no* position to condemn honor-killings, forced marriage, or suicide bombings."

Or do I misunderstand your line of reasoning here?

 

Oh, by all means then I’d be happy to join in the CC.com Victorian Ladies Sewing Circle circle-jerk. “Oooh, aren’t they just so savage! Oh yes quite! So barbaric their religious rituals, when will they simply grow up? Sorry dear, I just don’t think they’re quite up for it.” What’s the point? Or are you suggesting that the major actors (the US government) are doing something about it and should be supported? As usual, the most vehement defenders of women’s liberty on this board in the Islamic context are also those most likely to denounce as kooks, commies, and parlor Marxists those raising the issues of racial and gender equality, violence against women and human rights in other contexts. While I don’t know that one must condemn and criticize everything in order to criticize and condemn one thing, some consistency on this point would lead one to believe that those people were something more than hypocritical opportunists.

i don't think there is a discrete differentiation between the two; the concept of "metaphysics" is entirely a "historical phenomenon" in the sense that ALL concepts have a history and are intimately enmeshed within this historical context (using a word as somehow devoid of its historicity i think belies the actual conditionality of the word).

Further, it elides the connections between political islam and islam itself. the movements you mention have ALL identified with the core "teachings" of Muhammed, interpreting them as they see fit.

We can talk about actual conditions, and justifications for one's positions etc etc, but i think it's important to understand what kind of world a proponent of particular ideas may wish for.

 

Sure. I would stress that my point here is to try and understand that history and why such ideas or any idea becomes popular, gains adherents, and becomes important at that particular time. Yes, there are militant teachings in the Koran just as there are in the Bible. Why are those particular aspects so powerful at this historical juncture? How has the context changed that gives such ideas new life? The same questions can be asked with regard to American fundamentalism, ethnic violence in Kenya, or riots in suburban Paris. Why now? Simply stating that it’s religious extremism or that “these people have been killing themselves for thousands of years”, or “it’s Islam” or were in a “clash of civilizations” is simply neither historically accurate or particularly helpful understanding social change or in solving problems. Metaphysical and faith-based interpretations of current events like these need to be rejected by thoughtful people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...