Exxon Valdez.

[sirwoofalot]

OK, I am about as pro business as you can be, but I think itis time for Exxon to pay up. I think they got off easy with the original $ 5 Billion.

 

What say you?

 

 

 

Copyright 2008 PR Newswire Association LLC.

February 8, 2008

 

CORDOVA, Alaska, Victims of the Exxon Valdez oil spill have launched 'The Whole Truth' campaign, http://www.wholetruth.net/ , in support of the over 32,000 fishermen, women and Alaska Natives suing Exxon to recover damages for economic harm caused by the spill.

 

Nearly two decades after the spill caused irreparable damage to the environment and the economy of Prince William Sound, Exxon has taken its fight to avoid responsibility all the way to the Supreme Court, where oral arguments are scheduled for February 27.

 

While there is no dispute that the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill is one of our nation's worst environmental disasters, Exxon has waged a shameless fight to escape responsibility. 'The Whole Truth' campaign is meant to insure that the truth about the irreparable economic damage done to the communities of Prince William Sound be known, and that Exxon finally be held accountable.

 

'After the spill, Exxon promised to make the people and communities of Prince William Sound whole again,' said Steve Reidel of Cordova District Fishermen United (CDFU). 'That never happened. Nineteen years later after nearly two decades of broken promises it is finally time for Exxon to take responsibility and make amends for this catastrophe. Justice demands it.'

 

This year marks the nineteenth anniversary of the worst oil spill in American history. Exxon placed Captain Joseph Hazelwood, a known alcoholic, in command of its 1000 foot supertanker, the Exxon Valdez, despite nearly three years of reports that the captain was a heavy drinker.

 

Predictably, Hazelwood was drunk as the tanker left port carrying 53 million gallons of crude oil on board. His estimated blood alcohol level at the time of departure was .241, more than 3 times the current legal limit in most states to operate a vehicle.

 

After setting out he steered the tanker away from the shipping lane, set it on autopilot, and left the bridge. He left a fatigued third mate who was not qualified to navigate through the complex waters of Prince William Sound in charge to execute a tricky maneuver and avoid Bligh Reef. On March 24, 1989 the Exxon Valdez ran aground and ruptured 8 of its 11 tanks, leading to untold billions of dollars in damage to the economy and untold damage to the Sound's environment, which has never fully recovered.

 

'The fishermen, Native people and citizens of Prince William Sound are speaking with one voice, and the message to Exxon is clear. Take responsibility for what you've done. After nearly 20 years of spin, evasion, and litigation the time has come to hold Exxon accountable and let polluters know that they are not above the law. This is the only way we can protect our nation's waters,' said Jennifer Gibbins, Executive Director of Prince William Soundkeeper and one of the principles of The Whole Truth Campaign.

 

After three days of almost no response, Exxon finally began a clean-up effort but the oil had already spread too far and was beyond containment. The recovery effort was a charade. In a taped conversation, Exxon's representative explained: '....[there] needs to be something out there that looks like an effort is being made.' A Congressional report determined that Exxon's response was 'wholly inadequate.' Ultimately, only 14 percent of the oil was reclaimed. With the fear of oil contamination the State of Alaska was forced to close the fishery for the 1989 season. The following years were met by reduced harvests and depressed fish prices. 1300 miles of private shoreline was damaged some of which remains oiled today. The spill destroyed many subsistence activities of Natives in the area. The economy of the region was crippled, the effects of which are still felt today.

 

'It is very difficult to articulate the full impact, and more specifically, the losses associated with the Exxon Valdez oil spill,' said Travis Vlasoff, a local fisherman in the Native Village of Tatitlek and Project Analyst, Tatitlek Corporation. 'The effects to the Native Village of Tatitlek were no less than a complete and utter destruction of countless traditional practices.'

 

'We lost everything,' said Mike Webber, a highly respected native commercial fisherman from a Cordova fishing family, who carved a Shame Pole, a traditional totem pole carved to ridicule wealthy people who have a debt to society, to mark the 18th anniversary of the spill. 'Our economy has never been the same since. Now, while Exxon racks up multi-billion dollar profits, sometimes in a single quarter, we've been left to fight them for what they owe us for nearly 20 years.'

 

On February 27, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in what has amounted to a near 20-year effort by Exxon to shirk financial responsibility for its actions. The Fishermen and Native Subsistence lawsuit for private economic damages arose after Exxon refused to pay for most of the harm caused. This suit is a class action composed of 32,677 commercial fishermen, related individuals and businesses, private landowners, Native Alaskans, municipalities, and other claimants from across the country. The 83 day jury trial began in 1994 after years of discovery. It proceeded in three phases:

 

In phase I the jury found that Exxon and Hazelwood had been reckless.

 

In phase II the jury awarded fishermen in the major commercial fisheries $287 million in compensatory damages for economic harm. Under maritime law, some economic and other types of injury were barred. Outside of phase II other victims recovered economic damages that exceeded $500 million.

 

In phase III the jury was asked to determine whether Exxon and Hazelwood were liable for punitive damages and if so whether punitive damages should be awarded. The jury returned a verdict against Hazelwood for $5000 and against Exxon for $5 billion dollars.

 

Exxon appealed, and in 2001 the Ninth Circuit court of appeals affirmed the compensatory verdict and the jury's decision to award punitive damages. On remand the District Court found the $5 billion dollar award was justified but given the Court's evolving law with regard to punitive damages it reduced the award to $4.5 billion. Once again Exxon appealed. On December 22, 2006 a divided Ninth Circuit reduced the award to $2.5 billion. Exxon again challenged that ruling but the court refused to hear the case. On August 20, 2007 Exxon filed a writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court. On October 29, 2007 the Court agreed to hear the case. Oral arguments are set for February 27, 2008. The nineteenth anniversary of the spill is one month later, March 24.

 

On January 29, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin announced that the State of Alaska filed an amicus, or 'friend of the court,' brief supporting the award of punitive damages against Exxon. In a statement, Attorney General Talis Colberg said, 'Exxon's arguments, if they prevail, would not only deny Alaskans compensation to which they are due, but would reduce the incentive for those who use our coastal waters to operate in a careful and safe manner.'

 

At issue in this case is the $2.5 billion dollar punitive damage verdict, awarded by a jury to punish Exxon for its irresponsible corporate conduct and recklessness that caused the spill. Although this award breaks down to merely $76,500 per individual plaintiff, Exxon argues that it should not be punished at all. The Whole Truth campaign seeks to provide the complete truth about the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill, generate public awareness and support to end Exxon's quest to escape responsibility.

 

[archenemy]

What a shame. To continually battle to pay nothing at all is awful. How could they not feel that they are responsible at all for what they did?

[ZimZam]

And their profits were what in the last quarter?

[KaskadskyjKozak]

And their profits were what in the last quarter?

 

EXACTLY. what a bunch of assclowns. they have plenty of mulla - cough it up beyotches!

[archenemy]

Its not just that they have the money, of course. I think most everyone agrees that it is simply the ethical thing to do--making reparations is part of living in a society with a justice system.

[minx]

What a shame. To continually battle to pay nothing at all is awful. How could they not feel that they are responsible at all for what they did?

 

they're a corporation. they don't feel anything

 

 

they should pay though

[archenemy]

True. But there are human beings in that organization. How do they sleep at night?

[minx]

True. But there are human beings in that organization. How do they sleep at night?

 

based on the fact that most of the humans involved were probably in jr. hs. when this happened, i don't think they care.

[archenemy]

Good point. Depressing.

[KaskadskyjKozak]

 

it is human nature to duck responsibility

 

personally I prefer the Japanese standard where a leader commits ritual suicide.

[prole]

True. But there are human beings in that organization. How do they sleep at night?

 

Their pillowcases are filled with money.

[archenemy]

it is human nature to duck responsibility

 

personally I prefer the Japanese standard where a leader commits ritual suicide.

I don't agree with the first statement, but I sure do with the second!

Seppuko, isn't it?

[Couch Patato]

It sounds to me like a bunch of lawers just doing their job.

It seem more and more right and wrong, what the people vote for or against, can, and is overruled in the corts by the better lawers.

 

The Lawerys, rather rightly or wrongly, are defending their client, Exxon.

 

You have got to hand it to them. they have held up 5 Billion dollars fo 18, or is it 19 years now?

 

Any account here how can whip up an answer for how much Exxon saved in interests rate on 5 Billion dollars over 18 years? I bet those lawers are getting one big fat bonus, while the people get one big fat bonner.

 

[archenemy]

nice first post.

[builder206]

Exxon has a lot of weight to throw around. They're about to cause the courts to freeze $12BN of Venezuela's assets.

 

"Exxon's move drew an angry response from President Hugo Chavez over the weekend. 'Exxon Mobil is an imperialist bandit,' Chavez said Sunday during his radio and television show. 'If (Exxon) really freezes us...if you hurt us...We won't send any oil to the United States.' "

 

http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200802111423DOWJONESDJONLINE000498_FORTUNE5.htm

[archenemy]

So there! Nnhyaa nnhyaa nnyaa

[kevbone]

making reparations is part of living in a society with a justice system.

 

 

Tell that to the bush crime family.

[KaskadskyjKozak]

making reparations is part of living in a society with a justice system.

 

 

Tell that to the bush crime family.

 

yeah, and teach them about debit cards.

 

STFU, kevboner

[kevbone]

 

STFU, kevboner

 

 

 

Oh no….not Kevboner…..

 

Can you be original please…..

 

 

At least call me an assclown or a clownpuncher.

 

Let me guess……your next comment to me will be STFU? Right!

 

 

[KaskadskyjKozak]

 

lick sack

 

[Hugh Conway]

How do they sleep at night?

 

I imagine they get fellated to sleep by the prostitutes of their choice after the finest food the world can provide.

 

In short, pretty well.

[tomtom]

And you who still pump Exxon gas into your Tacomas and 4Runners are paying for it.

[KaskadskyjKozak]

 

and lesbarus