Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

then the woman takes all your money and you start all over again.

 

it takes money to make money. it's amazing what you can do with a little money if your wily enough.

Posted

i heard a snippit of a story the other day about a guy that started with a paperclip and kept trading up till he got a house. i haven't bothered googling it yet. i don't want to ruin it by finding out it can't be done.

 

 

Posted
i heard a snippit of a story the other day about a guy that started with a paperclip and kept trading up till he got a house.

 

Ummm, that's not news. No doc negative amortization home loans were pretty common.

 

No assets + no income + no doc loan = New House

 

WaMu would even supply the paperclip.

Posted

First you get the gas...then you get the money...then you get the women

 

isnt it first you get the power then you get the money

then you get the pussy don't be the dummy though

 

Dj quick

 

 

Posted

I think the logic behind letting taxing rich people less is some kind of trickle down theory. If you tax rich people too much they will live somewhere else and spend their money somewhere else. Let them keep their money and the surrounding businesses will benefit.

 

That's what the conservative governments have been telling me at least. I can't tell if they're right because it's never been any other way at least in my lifetime.

 

In the story they quote percentages of earnings which is a pretty bogus way to analyse the issue. 30.5% of $266,000 is $81,130, 30.7% of $13,523 is $4,151. If they are both receiving the same services from the government then how is this fair. The low income people are most likely receiving government subsidies to begin with.

 

I really am a socialist at heart and think the rich should help out the needy but to compare taxation as a percentage of income just doesn't make any sense to me. It's a much more complex problem than that.

Posted

I haven't had time to read it yet but it's kind of funny that the top tax bracket is about 44%, throw in all the sales taxes etc. and I don't see how they're paying only 30% of their income in tax?

Posted
I haven't had time to read it yet but it's kind of funny that the top tax bracket is about 44%, throw in all the sales taxes etc. and I don't see how they're paying only 30% of their income in tax?

 

it's a marginal rate. 44% of income above a certain amount.

Posted

Actually, it doesn't feel marginal when you are at the top end of that bracket; only when you first enter it.

And here in the US you get screwed another way. Once you become a HCE, your retirment savings generally gets screwed up too--even though you are at the low end of that bracket.

Taxes are so complex that the time spent figuring stuff out is amazing. Life slips away and you actually turn grey while doing them.

Posted
Actually, it doesn't feel marginal when you are at the top end of that bracket; only when you first enter it.

And here in the US you get screwed another way. Once you become a HCE, your retirment savings generally gets screwed up too--even though you are at the low end of that bracket.

Taxes are so complex that the time spent figuring stuff out is amazing. Life slips away and you actually turn grey while doing them.

 

that's what you get for being "rich" :P

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...