Buckaroo Posted March 26, 2007 Posted March 26, 2007 interesting story about a nuclear powered surveillance device on Nanda Devi, the CIA and a local climber who claims the first solo ascent. CLICKY Quote
Weekend_Climberz Posted March 26, 2007 Posted March 26, 2007 There was an article that Pete Takeda wrote recently in R&I. Kind of eery that they found higher than normal radiation levels in the Ganges Quote
billcoe Posted March 26, 2007 Posted March 26, 2007 So much for the dudes vow of secrecy. Tom Frost rules. Quote
Alpine_Tom Posted March 26, 2007 Posted March 26, 2007 There was some discussion of this in the Willi Unsoeld book that came out a couple years ago. At the time I thought it was a too "cloak-and-dagger" to be completely accurate, but perhaps not. Quote
catbirdseat Posted March 26, 2007 Posted March 26, 2007 There was an article that Pete Takeda wrote recently in R&I. Kind of eery that they found higher than normal radiation levels in the Ganges If there is higher radiation levels in the Ganges, I doubt it would be from the plutonium reactor buried in the Nanda Devi glacier. The huge dilutions involved would reduce radiation to background. More likely radiation would be as a result of mining activity. The article did say that plutonium 239 was detected with 95% certainty in coarse sediments from the waters of the Sanctuary. Likely ICP-MS was used for this test. It is extremely sensitive. Quote
jon Posted March 26, 2007 Posted March 26, 2007 Picked up the only copy of the book at the UW bookstore, so don't go there Quote
catbirdseat Posted March 26, 2007 Posted March 26, 2007 So much for the dudes vow of secrecy. Tom Frost rules. Secrecy is important, if there is a good reason for it. There is no longer a reason to protect those old secrets. In fact, it does more harm than good. There needs to be a public discussion about whether steps are needed to protect the Ganges from plutonium. Quote
kevino Posted March 26, 2007 Posted March 26, 2007 Good read. Kind of reminds me about the book, 'Confessions of a Dangerous Mind.' Quote
still_climbin Posted March 26, 2007 Posted March 26, 2007 The radioisotope thermalectectric generators (RTGs) use to power spy devices used plutonium 238, not plutonium 239. Pu-238 is a non-fissile isotope that produces strong alpha radiation and large amounts of heat. A walnut-sized sphere of Pu-238 oxide glows red hot, putting out about 60 watts of thermal energy, and can do so for a long time (still puts out 30 watts after 35 years). Unfortunately, Pu-238 is an extremely proficient cancer producer if inhaled. Its considered on of the top ten most lethal substances known. The Pu-239 that was measured in the river was likely the result of atmospheric bomb testing in the 1950s. That fallout is still being detected. Quote
catbirdseat Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 The article did say that the generator was composed of a mixture of the two isotopes 238 and 239. Quote
Mr_Phil Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 The article was written by a journalist. Go back and reread the article on Colin for a few laughs. Quote
catbirdseat Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 Those two isotopes exist. Both are man-made. Pu(238) is the preferred isotope for generators. Pu(239) is used in weapons. Pu(244) is the naturally occurring isotope with an 80 million year half-life. I fell in to a ring of fire... I fell in to a burning ring of fire I went down, down, down And the flames went higher. And it burns, burns, burns The ring of fire The ring of fire. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.