cindy66 Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 So what is the score between "the bone" and " the twit" today? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dechristo Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 Kevbone, considering the lack of literary skills you show here every fuckin' day, don't you, even you, understand how your correction of other's grammatical and spelling mistakes furthers the impression of you as a childish imbecile? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dechristo Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 So what is the score between "the bone" and " the twit" today? Â as usual, it's zero to zero Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seahawks Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 Kevbone, considering the lack of literary skills you show here every fuckin' day, don't you, even you, understand how your correction of other's grammatical and spelling mistakes furthers the impression of you as a childish imbecile? Â LOL had to delete my post after this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 where the guy that started this thread??? Lynch him.  dont you mean Where is?  you know there's a problem when Kevboner starts correcting other people's grammar  Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevbone Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 Kevbone, considering the lack of literary skills you show here every fuckin' day, don't you, even you, understand how your correction of other's grammatical and spelling mistakes furthers the impression of you as a childish imbecile? Â I think we finally understand one another! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dechristo Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 care to expound Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 care to expound  are you a masochist? WTF? don't egg him on! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cindy66 Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 So it is a tie ? Usually one is up a few points from the other. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvashtarkatena Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 Seahawk is quite likely THE dumbest object in the universe. That almost makes him worthy of scientific study. Â Almost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cindy66 Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 Hey Tvash, Dont you have to have brain cells to be a scientific study? He doesnt strike me as having alot of them to work with. Â Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dechristo Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 care to expound  are you a masochist? WTF? don't egg him on!  sadistic, ain't it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevbone Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 care to expound  No Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dechristo Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 So it is a tie ? Usually one is up a few points from the other. Â We found they are equally skilled at composing limmericks. Â Â Â and that Gforceclimber is a pusillanimous pharisaical punter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvashtarkatena Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 Hey Tvash, Dont you have to have brain cells to be a scientific study? He doesnt strike me as having alot of them to work with. Â Not necessarily. One theory of consciousness postulates that sentience is a continuum, starting with complex (humans) all the way down to simple (a toaster). While it is true that researchers would have to extend this continuum's lower end to accomodate Seahawk, the presence of brain cells would not be required. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dechristo Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 care to expound  No  For everyone, but Kevbone, this should be adequate evidence of a loving and merciful God. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cindy66 Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 So i should interpret that as "If first he doesnt succeed,he backs up and punts?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cindy66 Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 Hey Tvash, Dont you have to have brain cells to be a scientific study? He doesnt strike me as having alot of them to work with. Â Not necessarily. One theory of consciousness postulates that sentience is a continuum, starting with complex (humans) all the way down to simple (a toaster). While it is true that researchers would have to extend this continuum's lower end to accomodate Seahawk, the presence of brain cells would not be required. Â Â Â Â Thank you for clearing that up for me! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dechristo Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 Hey Tvash, Dont you have to have brain cells to be a scientific study? He doesnt strike me as having alot of them to work with. Â Not necessarily. One theory of consciousness postulates that sentience is a continuum, starting with complex (humans) all the way down to simple (a toaster). While it is true that researchers would have to extend this continuum's lower end to accomodate Seahawk, the presence of brain cells would not be required. Â in short, the manifestation of nonlocal twit characteristic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevenSeagal Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 So what is the score between "the bone" and " the twit" today?  as usual, it's zero to zero  More accurately: Nothing/Nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cindy66 Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 I have understood it all this time to be one of "no character" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dechristo Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 So i should interpret that as "If first he doesnt succeed,he backs up and punts?" Â I meant it as a wimpish legalistic one betting on what he doesn't understand sufficiently to verbalize, but yeah... what you wrote works. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dechristo Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 I have understood it all this time to be one of "no character" Â I believe, denotatively "gambler" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cindy66 Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 It all boils down to something I always say,"If you cant hunt with the big dogs,Stay on the porch" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevbone Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 care to expound  No  For everyone, but Kevbone, this should be adequate evidence of a loving and merciful God.  You rock Dechristo! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.