tvashtarkatena Posted January 5, 2007 Posted January 5, 2007 Hopefully by intercepting one of Kim's missiles. Quote
Dechristo Posted January 5, 2007 Posted January 5, 2007 Besides, who wants to be exterminated by a guy who looks like an extra from 'The Greatest Story Ever Told'? Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted January 5, 2007 Posted January 5, 2007 (edited) Is that a bomb on your head, or are you just happy to slay me? Edited January 5, 2007 by tvashtarkatena Quote
G-spotter Posted January 5, 2007 Posted January 5, 2007 If Kim bombed the USA, his US $$ counterfeiting scheme would suddenly be worthless! Estimates are that 80% of the counterfeit US dollars in circulation have been printed on NK government run presses. Quote
sexual_chocolate Posted January 5, 2007 Author Posted January 5, 2007 If Kim bombed the USA, his US $$ counterfeiting scheme would suddenly be worthless! Estimates are that 80% of the counterfeit US dollars in circulation have been printed on NK government run presses. so this means you would favor or not favor kim attacking instead of osama bin laden? Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted January 5, 2007 Posted January 5, 2007 If Kim bombed the USA, his US $$ counterfeiting scheme would suddenly be worthless! Estimates are that 80% of the counterfeit US dollars in circulation have been printed on NK government run presses. Damn. I can no longer blame our currency devaluation on Bush. Quote
G-spotter Posted January 5, 2007 Posted January 5, 2007 Kim would never do it cause he's dependent on the existance of the US to maintain his own power. His last bomb was a dud, too. Yield of only a couple kilotons, was supposed to be megatons. Osama would do it. Probably will sooner or later. Quote
sexual_chocolate Posted January 5, 2007 Author Posted January 5, 2007 geeosh dude, not whether or not he would do it, but who would you prefer nuclear bombed you? Osama bin laden or Kim? Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted January 5, 2007 Posted January 5, 2007 (edited) Rushed missile programs can be risky business. At this point, I'd say Kim's got a much better chance of nuking his own launch pad than the U.S. I think the test had a sub-kiloton yield. I don't think anyone knows what it was supposed to be. All seriousness aside, the most likely scenario is that both Kim and Osama would be involved: Kim sells the fireworks to Osama and company, who in turn deliver it to the U.S. gift wrapped in a shipping container. Thank Jebus Homeland Security now requires Canucks to show valid passports. I hear the bud up there is positively nuclear. Edited January 5, 2007 by tvashtarkatena Quote
sexual_chocolate Posted January 5, 2007 Author Posted January 5, 2007 goddamnit people, take your ludicrous speculating elsewhere. I'm conducting a very specific poll here. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted January 5, 2007 Posted January 5, 2007 Your thread's been hijacked by terrorists, so STFU. Quote
sexual_chocolate Posted January 5, 2007 Author Posted January 5, 2007 Your thread's been hijacked by terrorists, so STFU. islamists or north koreanists? Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted January 5, 2007 Posted January 5, 2007 Jebus, you're like a lamprey. Where are my box cutters? Quote
G-spotter Posted January 5, 2007 Posted January 5, 2007 geeosh dude, not whether or not he would do it, but who would you prefer nuclear bombed you? Osama bin laden or Kim? That's got nothing to do with it. If I preferred that I could fly like super pussy, I still won't fly. Quote
minx Posted January 5, 2007 Posted January 5, 2007 i knew archenemy and olyclimber were the same terroist...umm person! Quote
sexual_chocolate Posted January 5, 2007 Author Posted January 5, 2007 geeosh dude, not whether or not he would do it, but who would you prefer nuclear bombed you? Osama bin laden or Kim? That's got nothing to do with it. If I preferred that I could fly like super pussy, I still won't fly. you could still prefer that you could fly like super pussy, and that's what i'm asking here: would you prefer to be nuclear bombed by osama bin laden or korea kim? no more side-stepping. pretend the end is real close and you have to say it now! laden or kim. Quote
G-spotter Posted January 5, 2007 Posted January 5, 2007 I'm not getting trapped in your binary choice system. Not everything is black and white. The universe always contains a "maybe". Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted January 5, 2007 Posted January 5, 2007 (edited) Here's 10 megatons worth of quantum uncertainty for ya: Mmmmmmmm. Mushroomz.... Edited January 5, 2007 by tvashtarkatena Quote
sexual_chocolate Posted January 5, 2007 Author Posted January 5, 2007 we can't even CALL it a "universe" without being bound by the system you now so rebel against. Plus, within this unnamable (oops said too much), i am still proposing a question, admittedly within the human contextual construct (how could it be otherwise?), about a possible scenario regarding nuclear missiles; this is serious. I have changed my mind and now choose kim il-jong to bomb me. Quote
Dr_Flush_Amazing Posted January 5, 2007 Posted January 5, 2007 If I were to choose how I died, I'd choose being chased off a cliff by a throng of topless, beautiful women wearing mutlicolored roller-derby helmets. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted January 5, 2007 Posted January 5, 2007 geeosh dude, not whether or not he would do it, but who would you prefer nuclear bombed you? Osama bin laden or Kim? I'd prefer to be bombed by Ahmadinejad Quote
joblo7 Posted January 5, 2007 Posted January 5, 2007 they are both totally inexperienced in terrorism therefore neither could pull it off.but i chose , mr.osama, because of his sweetness and for afghan ol'times . Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.