Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

If Kim bombed the USA, his US $$ counterfeiting scheme would suddenly be worthless! Estimates are that 80% of the counterfeit US dollars in circulation have been printed on NK government run presses.

Posted
If Kim bombed the USA, his US $$ counterfeiting scheme would suddenly be worthless! Estimates are that 80% of the counterfeit US dollars in circulation have been printed on NK government run presses.

 

so this means you would favor or not favor kim attacking instead of osama bin laden?

Posted
If Kim bombed the USA, his US $$ counterfeiting scheme would suddenly be worthless! Estimates are that 80% of the counterfeit US dollars in circulation have been printed on NK government run presses.

 

Damn. I can no longer blame our currency devaluation on Bush.

Posted

Kim would never do it cause he's dependent on the existance of the US to maintain his own power.

 

His last bomb was a dud, too. Yield of only a couple kilotons, was supposed to be megatons.

 

Osama would do it. Probably will sooner or later.

Posted (edited)

Rushed missile programs can be risky business. At this point, I'd say Kim's got a much better chance of nuking his own launch pad than the U.S.

 

I think the test had a sub-kiloton yield. I don't think anyone knows what it was supposed to be.

 

All seriousness aside, the most likely scenario is that both Kim and Osama would be involved: Kim sells the fireworks to Osama and company, who in turn deliver it to the U.S. gift wrapped in a shipping container.

 

Thank Jebus Homeland Security now requires Canucks to show valid passports. I hear the bud up there is positively nuclear.

Edited by tvashtarkatena
Posted
geeosh dude, not whether or not he would do it, but who would you prefer nuclear bombed you? Osama bin laden or Kim?

 

That's got nothing to do with it. If I preferred that I could fly like super pussy, I still won't fly.

Posted
geeosh dude, not whether or not he would do it, but who would you prefer nuclear bombed you? Osama bin laden or Kim?

 

That's got nothing to do with it. If I preferred that I could fly like super pussy, I still won't fly.

 

you could still prefer that you could fly like super pussy, and that's what i'm asking here:

 

would you prefer to be nuclear bombed by osama bin laden or korea kim?

 

no more side-stepping. pretend the end is real close and you have to say it now! laden or kim.

Posted

we can't even CALL it a "universe" without being bound by the system you now so rebel against.

 

Plus, within this unnamable (oops said too much), i am still proposing a question, admittedly within the human contextual construct (how could it be otherwise?), about a possible scenario regarding nuclear missiles; this is serious.

 

I have changed my mind and now choose kim il-jong to bomb me.

Posted

they are both totally inexperienced in terrorism therefore neither could pull it off.but

 

i chose , mr.osama, because of his sweetness and for afghan ol'times .

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...