catbirdseat Posted September 19, 2006 Author Share Posted September 19, 2006 If I remember correctly, in fall gas prices would typically drop about twenty cents per gallon. That would be about 10%. A fifty cent drop against $3 would be 17%, perhaps a bit more than usual. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cj001f Posted September 19, 2006 Share Posted September 19, 2006 I'm sure that our resident Socialist Day Trader (aka fear_and_greed) has been feverishly following the petro-markets while putting together a trading strategy that will help him profit from the inevitable decline and collapse of global capitalism, so maybe he'll chime in if he's already taken his profits. Â I think he's busy helping his hero Hugo Chavez setup the AK-47 factory to protect Venezuala from the capitalists. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archenemy Posted September 19, 2006 Share Posted September 19, 2006 Anyhow - I am hoping that the same masterminds that have uncovered the great gas-price lowering conspiracy can shed some light on the neocon conspiracy that makes the price of air-conditioning units, shorts, and beach-houses rise in the summer, and the price of warm-coats, lift-tickets, and ski-equipment rise in the winter. Ph.D material for sure! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-spotter Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 save gas, fart in a jar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_Schuldt Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 I saw this letter in today's PI and I thought of JayB and Fairweather and of course you all. Monday, September 18, 2006  Letters to the Editor   HATRED   --------------------------------------------------------------------------------    Bush naysayers want gas prices to go higher In response to Robert Cummins' letter of Friday, he is just like most liberals hoping gas prices do go up to have a better chance of the liberals winning the Senate and the House in November.  Well, the gas prices are going down, the unemployment rate is low and going down, and the Dow is nearing an all-time high. Insurgents, who Cummins probably calls freedom fighters, are being caught on a daily basis.  Bush haters actually wish for higher gas prices, a poor economy and to not capture Osama bid Laden before the election.  It's a shame to be blinded by hatred.  John Picinich Seattle  This guy has his head up his ass. New home construction is down in most areas and as intrest rates rise people will be sqeezed out ot thier overpriced new homes. Also existing home sales are down. Lots of people could be hurting soon and maybe they will blame Bush..... Still going strong here but for how long? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayB Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 I saw this letter in today's PI and I thought of JayB and Fairweather and of course you all. Monday, September 18, 2006  Letters to the Editor   HATRED   --------------------------------------------------------------------------------    Bush naysayers want gas prices to go higher In response to Robert Cummins' letter of Friday, he is just like most liberals hoping gas prices do go up to have a better chance of the liberals winning the Senate and the House in November.  Well, the gas prices are going down, the unemployment rate is low and going down, and the Dow is nearing an all-time high. Insurgents, who Cummins probably calls freedom fighters, are being caught on a daily basis.  Bush haters actually wish for higher gas prices, a poor economy and to not capture Osama bid Laden before the election.  It's a shame to be blinded by hatred.  John Picinich Seattle  This guy has his head up his ass. New home construction is down in most areas and as intrest rates rise people will be sqeezed out ot thier overpriced new homes. Also existing home sales are down. Lots of people could be hurting soon and maybe they will blame Bush..... Still going strong here but for how long?  Good question. Superimpose this:  Net change in median household income,1999-2005, in 2005 dollars. On This  and then factor in this   and take a look at the real-estate valuation figures here: Global Insight Q1 '06 House Price Report. Seattle 34.1% Overvalued      Somewhere there's a chart that shows the percentage of all private sector jobs created since 2001, and real-estate, construction, mortgage-lending, etc adds up to a significant percentage - like a third or higher - since '01. I'm crossing my fingers and hoping that increased capital spending by corporations will help out on the jobs front and mitigate the impact of the slowing housing market, but if domestic consumption goes down then the only reason for them increase capital spending and hire more folks will be to sell things to consumers abroad.  Thankfully for Seattle, most of the major industries seem to be in reasonably good shape, so hopefully the impact of an RE slowdown will be muted by positive developments elsewhere. For places like Phoenix and South Florida, the future looks a bit rougher. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-spotter Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 How many people would live in Florida if they couldn't get state-subsidized hurricane insurance? Does it make sense for the government to take tax money from "grannies in trailer parks" so that people can own million dollar homes on the beach? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayB Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 Does Canadian government provide flood insurance? I know that the Australian government doesn't, and I have no idea why our government thought that this made for sound policy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-spotter Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 I wish the government would subsidize my liability insurance Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winter Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 the US government provides flood insurance becasue rich white people like to live in floodplains. they have nice views and are clost to the water. duh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayB Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 I take it you haven't spent much time in the Skokomish flood plains. White, yes. Rich, no. Â There's lots of rich white people on the coasts, but most of their homes are worth considerably more than what they'd get under the maximum payout, so The Man is actually doing a pretty poor job of taking care of his own, if that's the case.* As far as river floodplains go, being a flyfisherman and a kayaker, I've seen quite a few, and just about the only time you see expensive looking homes along the shore is when there's either elevated land close to the river, or the flows are dam-controlled and the risk of a catastrophic flood is low. Â Anyhow, back to the original question. Looks like the NFIP was originally passed in 1956 but never funded, then revived 1968 in response to the damage that Hurricane Betsey inflicted on Mississippi. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chucK Posted October 10, 2006 Share Posted October 10, 2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archenemy Posted October 10, 2006 Share Posted October 10, 2006 Who the hell answers a poll with "No Opinion"? If you don't have an opinion, don't answer the fucking poll. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvashtarkatena Posted October 10, 2006 Share Posted October 10, 2006 Back to the original question, my understanding is that gas prices have gone down due to three factors: Â 1) Seasonal demand (predictable). 2) Moderate new discoveries in proven oil reserves 3) Faster than predicted return of refinery capacity after Katrina. Â I'm not sure a poll from a population where nearly one out of every two believes that Saddam had WMDs when we invaded is instructive, here. Â I'm sure that some in the GOP would love to be able to manipulate gas prices, but the enormous loss in profits to energy companies that such a manipulation would entail would be, to say the least, prohibitive even to the most GOP-loving board member. Â GOP-inspired policies have had a significant effect on oil prices (and the resultant record profits) over the longer term...by invading Iraq and destabilizing the Middle East. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmace Posted October 10, 2006 Share Posted October 10, 2006 don't answer the fucking poll. Â But that's not on the list of choices... they put No Opinion in there to avoid an infinite loop Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archenemy Posted October 10, 2006 Share Posted October 10, 2006 I want an infinite loop. Sounds like fun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lI1|1! Posted October 10, 2006 Share Posted October 10, 2006 I want an infinite loop. Sounds like fun. Â you are an infinite loop. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archenemy Posted October 10, 2006 Share Posted October 10, 2006 Need that rotating pic of Paris here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marylou Posted October 10, 2006 Share Posted October 10, 2006 I don't want gas prices to go up, I want the Dems to take control of both houses of Congress. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvashtarkatena Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 gay cowboy  ...does this mean there are straight cowboys? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catbirdseat Posted October 11, 2006 Author Share Posted October 11, 2006 I don't want gas prices to go up, I want the Dems to take control of both houses of Congress. Let's not overreach. I'd settle even for one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bwrts Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 Who the hell answers a poll with "No Opinion"? If you don't have an opinion, don't answer the fucking poll. I am going to assume this is a joke but seriously did you consider that the peeps who didn't answer the "fuking poll" may have been added to the "no opinion" category?? Â I sure look fwd to the time when gas is not the issue. Â Last night on NPR I heard something about production in Alaska somewhere was slowed by violent wind storms....This made me think about 10-15 years ago when this probably wasn't a headline on NPR; as oil production just occurred and weather patterns around production were not "worthy news" Â As Dylan once sang "The times They are A-changin'...." Â WE are all just lambs being led to the firestorm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cj001f Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 (edited) I want an infinite loop. Sounds like fun. make your mac pilgrimmage  btw No Opinion = "i'm a retard, the most applicable option for most Americans" Edited October 11, 2006 by cj001f Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.