Jump to content

[TR] Mt. Stuart- North Ridge (upper w/ Gendarme) 7/30/2006


Recommended Posts

Posted

Climb: Mt. Stuart-North Ridge (upper w/ Gendarme)

 

Date of Climb: 7/30/2006

 

Trip Report:

Aaron Zabriskie and I C2Ced NR Stuart on Saturday. It goes without saying that we need to head back next year to do the Complete C2C.

 

In general I found the photography to be hard. Often we were climbing in the shade or in between too strong of a constrast. The lieback photo had to be made B&W to get rid of a bluish cast that wouldn't go away nicely otherwise.

 

Does the Gendarme get light in the afternoon or closer to the solstice? We were on it around 11:30 AM.

 

Pictures (if a photo has me (red backpack) in it, then credit is to Aaron, with a little postprocessing by me):

 

ztraverse.jpg

 

zknifeedge.jpg

 

zuppernr.jpg

 

zgendarme.jpg

 

zlieback.jpg

 

zaaron.jpg

 

zsherpaflagpole.jpg

 

zstuart.jpg

 

 

 

Gear Notes:

shoulda had ankle gaiters to keep the Cascadian out of my tennies

 

coulda had less food/water -- friggin' cold on the ridge, and we were faster than we anticipated

 

Approach Notes:

Stuart Glacier was frozen in the morning and required crampons with the tennies

  • Replies 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Nice work.

 

The 3rd photo is the same composition as the cover of Climbing a few months back, minus clouds and with the climber a little lower.

 

If you didn't place gear on the great gendarme pitches (at least the first, judging by photos) then why bring a rope at all?

Posted

Rad, I placed two points of intermediate protection on the 1st pitch. Above the 1st intermediate ledge, and above the 2nd intermediate ledge. They're extended on slings, so that's why you can't see them well. I didn't place a piece for the bottom lieback because it just didn't seem useful. By the time I felt ready to place it (I was far enough off the deck for it to be useful), the difficulties were already over. For the higher ones, I'd rather just climb through the lieback (risking a ledge fall) and have the pro easily placed at the ledge (protecting the big fall, which happened from broken hold or rockfall or act of God).

Posted

Gary-

 

Looks like you saved the Green from the more exposed photo, and then turned up the blues for the sky.

 

Looks vivid; sorry if this is a layman's analytical view; I only have Infranview, and haven't gotten that far with experimenting yet (though I'm looking forward to what my new Fuji F30 will do) thumbs_up.gif

Posted

They climbed the Upper North Ridge (top 1/3 of the ridge).

 

The COMPLETE N Ridge starts at the toe of the ridge and continues all the way to the top, including the Upper part which they did.

Posted

It's really more like the top 1/2 of the ridge?

 

summit 9200

notch 8200

base of lower ridge 66-6800 based on map?

 

Doesn't Beckey pitch it out as like only 10 or so, whereas he weasels 18 out of the upper?

Posted

I have only climbed the ridge from the notch...and after climbing it I thought it was total B.S! I enjoy climbing asthetic lines, and the n. ridge is one hell of a line...but why would anyone want to start at that notch and ruin such a rad ridge. I was dissapointed seeing how far up the ridge the notch was. Really felt like i half assed it...serious unfinished business up there smile.gif

Posted

You say potayto, and I say potahto

You say tomayto, I say tomahto

potayto, potahto

tomayto, tomahto

Let's call the whole thing off!

 

...

 

 

(and don't forget GWB says tomatoe!)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...