whoohoonickieclimbs Posted December 4, 2005 Posted December 4, 2005 You could probably get better pictures of him too! Quote
JosephH Posted December 5, 2005 Posted December 5, 2005 Lance - Finding a new monkey, in a forest of monkeys, while news is not that big a deal. Finding a new hominid where none exist is another deal altogether. Again, the deal with QPE/S is actually pretty simple - creatures don't come or exist down through time in ones and twos - they need minimally sustaining populations and a habitat capable of supporting them. The idea that there are such populations of Hominidae roaming about without any substantive interactions with humans is beyond a stretch. It's up there with how a population of Nessies could survive in a relatively sterile lake (from a protein perspective) or how UFO's would manage the [time] travel required to come here... Quote
Winter Posted December 5, 2005 Posted December 5, 2005 Come on Joseph, let's not lump UFOs in the same boat as Bigfoot and Nessie. Didn't you see Hitchhiker's Guide? Just pick a probability to deal with the pesky time space continuum. Quote
olyclimber Posted December 5, 2005 Posted December 5, 2005 I think Bigfoot is blurry, that's the problem. It's not the photographer's fault. Bigfoot is blurry. And that's extra scary to me, because there's a large, out-of-focus monster roaming the countryside. Run. He's fuzzy. Get outta here. Quote
lancegranite Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 short video of blurry creature like thing With solid proof like this, who could not believe? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.