Ireneo_Funes Posted October 13, 2005 Share Posted October 13, 2005 add khomeini? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted October 13, 2005 Author Share Posted October 13, 2005 I find it funny that if you (insert ludicrous hypothetical situation here) you'd all be (praising/condemning) (him/her), and that it all comes down to (latin phrase). -CobC. Madlibs! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted October 13, 2005 Author Share Posted October 13, 2005 I've been gone for awhile, working and such. I see I haven't been missing much. Spoken like a true liberal. Go ahead, sweep the real issues under the carpet...no ones looking! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TREETOAD Posted October 13, 2005 Share Posted October 13, 2005 STOP IT!!! JUST STOP IT!! I CAN'T STAND THIS ANYMORE! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
underworld Posted October 13, 2005 Share Posted October 13, 2005 add harmony? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ireneo_Funes Posted October 13, 2005 Share Posted October 13, 2005 arm me with harmony quick, what's that song? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skykilo Posted October 14, 2005 Share Posted October 14, 2005 Other People's Politics? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ireneo_Funes Posted October 14, 2005 Share Posted October 14, 2005 Other People's Politics? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
underworld Posted October 14, 2005 Share Posted October 14, 2005 (edited) army of whorebunnies? Edited October 14, 2005 by underworld Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stonehead Posted October 14, 2005 Share Posted October 14, 2005 Booga booga booga!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted October 14, 2005 Author Share Posted October 14, 2005 Lets pump this thread up today. I want to see lots of debating and argueing about politics. Lots of condecending remarks, and witty retorts. Skeptical dismissals and incredulous sighs. Walk your parties line...no free thinking allowed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
underworld Posted October 14, 2005 Share Posted October 14, 2005 ***sigh*** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
selkirk Posted October 14, 2005 Share Posted October 14, 2005 Lets pump this thread up today. I want to see lots of debating and argueing about politics. Lots of condecending remarks, and witty retorts. Skeptical dismissals and incredulous sighs. Walk your parties line...no free thinking allowed. Is that the best you can do? My god your a vapid whiny little liberal. I won't even dignify it with a the thought it takes to respond. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted October 14, 2005 Author Share Posted October 14, 2005 Here are some topics: link linky linky winky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
underworld Posted October 14, 2005 Share Posted October 14, 2005 My god your a vapid whiny little liberal. a little verbose, eh? doesn't the word 'liberal' cover all that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
selkirk Posted October 14, 2005 Share Posted October 14, 2005 My god your a vapid whiny little liberal. a little verbose, eh? doesn't the word 'liberal' cover all that? Says the self righteous, holier than thou, gun stroking, inferiority complex rideen, neo-con. Or am I being redundant again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
underworld Posted October 14, 2005 Share Posted October 14, 2005 yes, but the 'beating a dead horse' method is expected Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catbirdseat Posted October 14, 2005 Share Posted October 14, 2005 Sorry to interrupt this hilarity but here's a fun politics link: 0lberman The Olberman article would have had much greater impact with graphics. You could plot a timeline with the date of political embarrassments denoted by a blue bar. The corresponding terror alert would be denoted by an orange bar. To be fair, you'd have to plot ALL the political embarrassments and All the terror alerts. The problem would be defining the threshold for political embarassment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
selkirk Posted October 14, 2005 Share Posted October 14, 2005 Now your just raising more proelbems. We don' need more problems we need solutions! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
underworld Posted October 14, 2005 Share Posted October 14, 2005 and spell check Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chucK Posted October 14, 2005 Share Posted October 14, 2005 I found this graph someone did. It's not really very convincing to Olbermann's implicit allegations: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catbirdseat Posted October 14, 2005 Share Posted October 14, 2005 (edited) It's an interesting graph showing approval ratings versus time in relation to terror alert events. Similar to what I was postulating but not exactly what the Olberman article was referring to. You have first the news story such as on Karl Rove, then you have the dip in approval rating, then you have the terror alert, then finally the corresponding rise in approval rating. Reminds me of the boy who cried wolf. Edited October 14, 2005 by catbirdseat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.