KaskadskyjKozak Posted January 19, 2005 Posted January 19, 2005 And how does it relate to the average over say the last 50,000 years? 100 or so years is hardly a blip on the geological time scale. Quote
thelawgoddess Posted January 19, 2005 Posted January 19, 2005 100 or so years is hardly a blip on the geological time scale. perhaps. but most people don't live that long. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted January 19, 2005 Posted January 19, 2005 100 or so years is hardly a blip on the geological time scale. perhaps. but most people don't live that long. Â if we have a couple back-to-back "winters" like this one, I won't want to. Quote
crazyjizzy Posted January 20, 2005 Posted January 20, 2005 AlpineK: Â While we are speaking the 70's, 76-77 was dryer than this year. As was 80-81. So take your data, and jam it up your ass. Quote
AlpineK Posted January 20, 2005 Posted January 20, 2005 CrazyJZ suffers from a number of psycological problems; fortunately most of them are harmless. Quote
marylou Posted January 20, 2005 Posted January 20, 2005 Someone who knows something about snow told me that this BS $#%!!!! warm weather killed the depth hoar that was causing all the problems in the hills. Â At least there's that, I guess. Â Screw skiing, I'm going to the South Pacific! Quote
cstemley Posted January 20, 2005 Posted January 20, 2005 It's true the snow pack is droping, if you look at old glacier photos to now, But 92/93? was dry and 93/94 was the Bomb, and 2 yrs ago the blast hit 2weeks into febuary and stoped end of march. So I'm still waiting and if it dosen't hit? I'll just become another road rager on I5 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.