jordop Posted November 18, 2004 Posted November 18, 2004 http://www.millenniumjet.com/ Ignore the fact that we've been dreaming of jetpacks for the last fifty odd years, there is tantilizing suggestion about right now that it is likely to happen in the next decade No it won't be affordable at first. But it will. And the notion of approaches will change forever -- for all the rich alpinists everywhere. Imagine: no more slogs into the Pickets, etc etc. I'm serious. This will rock! Way better thean the approach spider Spliffy's been working on. Or my bivy car idea, which is pretty much stalled in funding . . . Quote
glacier Posted November 18, 2004 Posted November 18, 2004 Four-seater pedal car, for all your approach needs. Quote
Mark_Husbands Posted November 18, 2004 Posted November 18, 2004 give thanks for the wilderness act, and support its enforcement. Quote
Off_White Posted November 18, 2004 Posted November 18, 2004 Ignore the fact that we've been dreaming of jetpacks for the last fifty odd years, I've been holding out for line-of-sight teleportation. Quote
catbirdseat Posted November 18, 2004 Posted November 18, 2004 Supposedly, the summit register on Goode Peak once had an inscription saying, "Beam me down Scotty! How do I get off this thing?" Quote
Dru Posted November 18, 2004 Posted November 18, 2004 I am still waiting for my giant seagull-powered flying peach! Quote
chirp Posted November 18, 2004 Posted November 18, 2004 I have been able to fly for some time now, most obscure destinations are well within my grasp. Quote
layton Posted November 19, 2004 Posted November 19, 2004 Jordan, what is this "bivy car" of which you speak...I am intrigued? Can The General be of assistance? Quote
jordop Posted November 19, 2004 Author Posted November 19, 2004 Jordan, what is this "bivy car" of which you speak...I am intrigued? Can The General be of assistance? Now keep in mind that these are preliminary schematics, but I think you'll agree that the design is breathtaking! Like all strokes of genius, this came to me in a gin soaked dream one night: Quote
ScottP Posted November 19, 2004 Posted November 19, 2004 You would miss it. Oh, yes, you would. Quote
Jedi Posted November 19, 2004 Posted November 19, 2004 Wouldn't it be cheaper just to parachute in? Of course that doesn't help you on the hike out. Quote
ketch Posted November 19, 2004 Posted November 19, 2004 A friend of mine was once rescued with one of those helium balloon air grabs where a plane grabs the rope with a fork on the way by. He used to say that it was the most exciteing thing he ever did. If you parachute in you could always get out with a balloon. No reason to introduce a boring walk or anything. Quote
D-dog Posted November 24, 2004 Posted November 24, 2004 Absent a half-decent landing area, simply "parachuting in" is about as safe as just dropping in freefall and hoping against hope for a soft landing. A thrutching, crashing landing into trees or monster talus is all but certain to induce serious injuries - and the twitcher the landing area, the more it pays to walk it beforehand to get the lay of the land. Clearly not very helpful in terms of random backcountry approach plans. There's not many things less fun than pounding into a grove of big trees under canopy and ending up stuck 80 feet off the ground, dangling by a bit of nylon and some cracking twigs. Take it from someone with too much firsthand experience doing just that. Peace, D-d0g Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.