allthumbs Posted June 10, 2003 Posted June 10, 2003 Ok, it's not too soon to think about this - which Republicans will run against the current President in the primaries? Surely someone will, there are a lot of dissatisfied Republican voters after the first 2.5 years of Bush II. Does anyone have a chance of beating him in the primaries? If so, who? the new, more sensitive, trask (Bob, please refrain from saying "cunt" and "cunt licker" as these words offend my sensibilities) Quote
JGowans Posted June 10, 2003 Posted June 10, 2003 I think any student from tardblog.com would be a formidable enough opponent for GW. Quote
Necronomicon Posted June 10, 2003 Posted June 10, 2003 If only Hilary would run!!! Maybe she could save us from this nightmare. Quote
erik Posted June 10, 2003 Posted June 10, 2003 wouldnt it be sweet if al queada poisoned all of our minds and it destroyed the concept of the political party?? i mean this is all just a dream, so we when reawoke from our sickness the only thing left would be peace and harmony??? that or baby jesus would revel himself black and offset the course of the "whitey" foeva........ Quote
MtnGoat Posted June 10, 2003 Posted June 10, 2003 "I think any student from tardblog.com would be a formidable enough opponent for GW. " I think the Dems should consider this candidate pool for both legislative and presidential elections, given their continual drubbing by dumb 'ol Dubya. If you can't outwit the guy you claim is so dumb, where does that leave you? Quote
JGowans Posted June 10, 2003 Posted June 10, 2003 It's not Dubya that outwits anyone, it's his crooked friends that outwit the average American voter. They've been doing it for years in the investor world, and are finding it just as easy to do it in the political world. Quote
MtnGoat Posted June 10, 2003 Posted June 10, 2003 So it's just all those darned voters who are stupid, eh? Quite a worldview to think this of so many people one doesn't know. Quote
JGowans Posted June 10, 2003 Posted June 10, 2003 Don't let me get started on you you fucking pedantic piece of over-ripe horsecock. If you are the yardstick, then it's little wonder they are duped because you're a fucking senseless imbecile. Before you launch into breaking down my reply word for word, learn how to use the fucking quote functionality on this site, print it all out in neat little bundles and then stick them as far up your fucking arse as gravity will allow. Fucking wankstain. Quote
Sphinx Posted June 10, 2003 Posted June 10, 2003 MtnGoat said: So it's just all those darned voters who are stupid, eh? Quite a worldview to think this of so many people one doesn't know. Quote
Sphinx Posted June 10, 2003 Posted June 10, 2003 trask said: sphinx = jgowens = mattp Yup, exactly. Quote
JGowans Posted June 10, 2003 Posted June 10, 2003 I'm bored of all you bastards. I don't know why arseholes like MtnGoat and Sphinx exist. It perplexes me ad infinitum. It's a real conundrum because if there were a God, surely he'd not be so sadistic as to place these 2 plebs on this earth. Yet, if we are to believe that there is no God, then why isn't Darwinism taking effect and ridding the world of decrepid and useless mounds of lard-laden louts like MtnChoad and Sphincter? Quote
allthumbs Posted June 10, 2003 Author Posted June 10, 2003 erik said: trask = rodney dangerfield "baby!...last time I saw a mouth like that it had a hook in it". Quote
Fairweather Posted June 10, 2003 Posted June 10, 2003 "Saturday Night Live" had a parody last week in which an MSNBC Hardball's Chris Mathews look-alike discussed the Democrats chances for victory in '04: "The only hope for these Democrats is to push for the voting age to be lowered to six years old, then convince 'Sponge Bob' to run as their candidate." Quote
CrazyFlattlander Posted June 10, 2003 Posted June 10, 2003 I think it would set a precedent for the President to run contested and even more not to get the nomination. Besides, this country needs 5 and a half more years of Bushy. Quote
Ursa_Eagle Posted June 10, 2003 Posted June 10, 2003 where's the vomit emoticon when you need it? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.