akhalteke

That's a good question. I guess one way to "prove" that people existed that long ago would be to look at the evolution of languages. We know from our own experience how language changes over time. It is dynamic, but not enough to form into a whole other language within our own lifetime, yeah? So how long would it take for a new language to grow from an old one? Hundreds of years perhaps? And how about to evolve into the many different languages we have? Certainly thousands. That, and carbon dating. I think he was talking about individual people. Like Ghengis Khan.

I have absolutely no idea what you are trying to say here. But I'll give you an answer to the question you should have asked. "Why would you bring up Stephen King in this discussion?" Well, my friend, let me tell you. It is an analogy. I used an analogy to show you the weakness in your feeble argument. Please note that I did not state my own personal beliefs in any way. Nor did I refute your beliefs. I only pointed out that your premise does not hold water. So you call all history revisionist history? Wow, you liberals really are paranoid. When someone who makes fun of Christians and was charged with the veracticy of the historical documents of the time says he existed, he probably did. Now, lets look at the proponderance of evidence you have thrusted forth: I see that it is difficult for you to follow the path of a debate. Let me slow it down for you. Not only do I not call all history revisionist history, I did not call any history revisionist history. What I am trying to draw your attention to is that if your arguments are not strong, then you will not be able to sway anyone to take any action at all. You were trying to get Kevbone to read works that mentioned Christ. You were also trying to get him to believe that because a non-Christian wrote about Jesus, He surely existed. This is not a strong debate point. Pick a better one. There are plenty to chose from (as you obviously must know from your extensive reading). So, I am still waiting for you to show me your evidence. If I have more evidence than you, how does that make your theory any more plauable than mine or even less so? Inquiring minds really can't wait to hear.

Ghengis Khan? Just a story to get little kids in Siberia to stay close to home.

Napoleon? Fake attempt for the French to have military pride.

The revolutionary war was really all a farce. Some patriotic dribble to motivate youngsters to volunteer for the 1st WW.

Better get Kev's mouth checked, I am sure he could use some Acyclovir right now.

What? Steven King described people that came back from the dead even though he wasn't Lazarus. That doesn't make it true. Stephen King wasn't a 1st century historian. Stunning bit of logic. Tacitus wasn't alive when Christ was. Hence the Historian part ace. And your assumption is that everything a historian writes is true. hyperbole. amazingly clever and original of you. Did Kev get your password?

I have absolutely no idea what you are trying to say here. But I'll give you an answer to the question you should have asked. "Why would you bring up Stephen King in this discussion?" Well, my friend, let me tell you. It is an analogy. I used an analogy to show you the weakness in your feeble argument. Please note that I did not state my own personal beliefs in any way. Nor did I refute your beliefs. I only pointed out that your premise does not hold water. So you call all history revisionist history? Wow, you liberals really are paranoid. When someone who makes fun of Christians and was charged with the veracticy of the historical documents of the time says he existed, he probably did. Now, lets look at the proponderance of evidence you have thrusted forth:

What? Steven King described people that came back from the dead even though he wasn't Lazarus. That doesn't make it true. Stephen King wasn't a 1st century historian. Stunning bit of logic. Tacitus wasn't alive when Christ was. Hence the Historian part ace.

Well, Jesus wouldn't tell me to tell you to Take a Hot Karl on Kevbone's face now would he? Go take a hot carl on Kevbone's face.

Well then what do you base your beliefs on then? I am curious? Because it ties nicely into your political ideologies? Because you think it will piss off your political adversaries? You have no evidence and there is evidence to support the contrary. What does that mean in a debate? I can't remember. Oh wai, yes I can "You lose." Now, the question we have to ask is why you feel the need to state such a thing in the first place especially after being confronted with the fact that there is not proof of your beliefs and proof to the contrary. Now taht is quite a conondrum.

What? Steven King described people that came back from the dead even though he wasn't Lazarus. That doesn't make it true. Stephen King wasn't a 1st century historian.

Man….shouldn’t I be telling you that…… Glad you said that. Please. Give me the mound of evidence that you sorted through to come to your brilliant and in no way politically charged opinion about the non-existence of a Jew 2000 years ago.

That their writings described Jesus despite the fact that they weren't Chrstians. This seems to be unbiased proof of his existence whereas proof of his non-existence is... well, non-existent.

Kevin. Have you read yet? Or are you going to mire yourself in your ignorant beliefs? How about reading up on Pliny the Younger? Seutonius? Flavius Josephus? Nah... better be safe and just stick with what you [don't] know. Right?

I would, but that blister on your lip is very disconcerting...you should get some, errr, medication? You know, before it like spreads or sumpin'... Check your dick Roody!

You really believe that Jesus existed! You are a fucking idiot! Hey Kev, do your self a favor and look up Cornelius Tacitus. You are really uneducated aren't you? For someone knowing so little, you sure do run your mouth.

Considering she smelled like taco bell turd with patchouli oil on it before she even got in the tree; probably pretty fucking bad.

Some of us have to make livings. That and I live 6 hours to the nearest good climbing. It is really good climbing though. Hopefully, I will be there this weekend. Partner seems like he might bail though. Fucking barrack's whores!

Even the Jews and the Muslims believe in Jesus you fucking tool. The only people that don't are little boys who were raped by priests and grew up into big giant atheist nerds and write incessantly about pan-existential jibberish. You are a fucking sucker.

What would Jesus do? Oh....wait....Jesus never exsisted You really believe that Jesus never existed? You are a fucking idiot.

You have a lot more credence when your spokesperson ins't high when they give an interview on national TV.

That metric shit is French. In Texas it's called Rule .308. Talk 'merican. I am in the Army fuck-tard. We call use metric for caliber.

At least Rudy did something. Bob just talks a lot of shit about how he is gonna kick everyone of our asses; I think he has threatened me a few times. Still waiting. Would love to though. Long time since I busted a polack's lip.

Its luck... and yeah, I freefall.