Seahawks

more from her.. I was one who supported giving President Bush the authority, if necessary, to use force against Saddam Hussein. I believe that that was the right vote. I have had many disputes and disagreements with the administration over how that authority has been used, but I stand by the vote to provide the authority because I think it was a necessary step in order to maximize the outcome that did occur in the Security Council with the unanimous vote to send in inspectors. And I also knew that our military forces would be successful.

Hillary Clinton - how soon the fanatic Dems forget

There is a very easy way to prevent anyone from being put into harm’s way, and that is for Saddam Hussein to disarm. And I have absolutely no belief that he will. I have to say that this is something I have followed for more than a decade… And the very difficult question for all of us is how does one bring about the disarmament of someone with such a proven track record of a commitment if not an obsession with weapons of mass destruction. And I ended up voting for the resolution after carefully reviewing the information and intelligence that I had available, talking with people whose opinions I trusted, trying to discount political or other factors that I didn’t believe should be in any way a part this decision. And it is unfortunate that we are at the point of a potential military action to enforce the resolution. That is not my preference, it would be far preferable if we not only had legitimate cooperation from Saddam Hussein and a willingness on his part to disarm and account for his chemical and biological storehouses, but that if we had a much broader alliance and coalition. But we are in a very difficult position right now… With respect to whose responsibility it is to disarm Saddam Hussein. I just do not believe that given the attitudes of many people in the world community today that there would be a willingness to take on very difficult problems were it not for the United States leadership. I am willing to take a very difficult step for me to say we have to disarm this man

Did I stutter? Dechristo.

Exactly. Each and every sect thinks it knows better than the other sect, and knows better than anyone else. It doesn't matter if the ideas conflict with science. Faith means not listening to anyone else's argument with an open ear. Quite the contrary. Men and women of faith are praised and held in the highest esteem for being steadfast in closing their minds to ideas that might contaminate the dogma. I find that most visceral attacks against religion are not made in a response to actual incidents of religious people engaging in a "I know better than thou" attitude, but rather, by the conscience of those who reject religion and God. Furthermore, those who attack all religious people, and faiths with a broad-brush are exhibiting the same disrespect, dismissiveness, ignorance, and outright arrogance that they claim to be rallying against. Can you say DC.

and I care about that why?

Seahawks, I like it, it's funny, but I have seen it many many times. I think it's stale and old is all, probably been around since it came out with Windows 95. Probably is. First time I'd seen it. someone at work sent it this AM. Had a laugh, though might make someone else laugh, guess not. Should have given some coal out and they could made some diamond up there asses.

Come to the dark side.

Did you get a chuckle when you saw your dick? No but I got a chuckle when they compared yours to a hyperdermic needle.

like "I'll go warm up the DeLorean." Okay

come on now - that's total speculation! You know those WSU girls they will have sex with anyone or thing. That isn't speculation. lol

Come back with the short skirt and we all may get a chuckle.

None of you got a chuckle?? Line from Man from Snowy River "expand your mind, Have a beer, no have two beers."

You sound like Kevbone you nut.

Thats why it talks in the bible about the wind blowing to the east and the coming from the west even before they knew the earth was round. Stupid.

http://www.komotv.com/news/7626511.html Fishy. Why not just walk back to truck and drive home? He was messing around. Cougar sex.

Subject: FW: TECH SUPPORT!! Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 19:13:43 +0000 Last year I upgraded from Girlfriend 7.0 to Wife 1.0. I soon noticed that the new program began unexpected child processing that took up a lot of space and valuable resources. In addition, Wife 1.0 installed itself into all other programs and now monitors all other system activity. Applications such as Poker Night 10.3, Football 5.0, Hunting and Fishing 7.5, and Racing 3.6 I can't seem to keep Wife 1.0 in the background while attempting to run my favorite applications. I'm thinking about going back to Girlfriend 7.0 , but the uninstall doesn't work on Wife 1.0. Please help! Thanks, Troubled User. (KEEP READING) REPLY: Dear Troubled User: This is! a very common problem that men complain about. Many people upgrade from Girlfriend 7.0 to Wife 1.0, thinking that it is just a Utilities and Entertainment program. Wife 1.0 is an OPERATING SYSTEM and is designed by its Creator to run EVERYTHING!!! It is also impossible to delete Wife 1.0 and to return to Girlfriend 7.0 It is impossible to uninstall, or purge the program files from the system once installed. You cannot go back to Girlfriend 7.0 because Wife 1.0 is designed to not allow this. Look in your Wife 1.0 manual under Warnings-Alimony-Child Support . I recommend that you keep Wife 1.0 and work on improving the situation. I suggest installing the background application "Yes Dear" to alleviate software augmentation. The best course of action is to enter the command C:\APOLOGIZE because ultimately you will have to give the APOLOGIZE command before the system will return to normal anyway. Wife 1.0 is a great program, but it tends to be very high maintenance Wife 1.0 comes with several support programs, such as Clean and Sweep 3.0, Cook It 1.5 and Do Bills 4.2. However, be very careful how you use these programs. Improper use will cause the system to launch the program Nag Nag 9.5. Once this happens, the only way to improve the performance of Wife 1.0 is to purchase additional software. I recommend Flowers 2.1 and Diamonds 5.0 ! WARNING!!! DO NOT, under any circumstances, install Short Skirt Secretary 3.3. This application is not supported by Wife 1.0 and will cause irreversible damage to the operating system.

Told ya they would do this, it all about politics. WASHINGTON - In grudging concessions to President Bush, Democrats intend to draft an Iraq war-funding bill without a timeline for the withdrawal of U.S. troops and shorn of billions of dollars in spending on domestic programs, officials said Monday.

Thats what you see no matter what the pic or story. Called Dem glasses.

Hey everyones favorite thread. Wait, wait thats speculation. Sorry.

Thats so freaking genious......... Kevbone earns today's funniest Sprayer award! Here is another K-fed. Put your dem fog glasses on.

Him or Kerry?? Hello. Thats why. Another nut job like Kevbone. Same reason Hilliary will loose.

That all you can say because you know it is true, typical response from the non thought out response of the left. Dude… you can’t sit there and tell me you actually think George W is a good president. He is a liar and will most likely go to jail after his term for war profiteering and misleading the country. And what really is scary is people like you who voted for him in the first place. Holy crap….what were you thinking? That right there is why you nut job dems loose. Jail. Come on. Hopefully your joking. Otherwise I do feel sorry for you. The world did feel like he was doing it. France was secretly selling weapons as with Russia. They also were reaping the benifits of the oil - food program. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out why the wanted to wait. Hell Iraq owed Russia billions.

That all you can say because you know it is true, typical response from the non thought out response of the left.