Actually, we do understand that.  City folk pay the bills.  Rural communities, on average, are subsidized 7:1 - fed money they burn:tax money they contribute.  With Urban folk, its the 1:7.   WA's ratios are about the same on the state level.   
  
Without Seattle, Eastern WA would dry up and blow away.  
  
This is good news for unemployed fishermen out there, though.  
  
These numbers should come as no surprise to rural communities. Higher average incomes and higher populations densities...the math's not too difficult here.  
  
But hey, if you want to play Jeremiah Johnson on our dime, fine.  After all, we're not the one's whining about 'taking our country back' n shit - like the spoiled fucking entitlement cases that you are.