underworld

sharing some ideas doesn't constitute generalized support. he slams bush all the time. is he really broadcast by foxnews? really? seems you hear him say that foxnews won't have him on.

savage does not support bush

Who are you asking this too? In my opinion W is a frickin nut case who has lost all perspective of being a human. i can handle that

and most importantly e) i won't leave my latte unattended around you again

a) there is no soy in my latte b) if i didn't know you shat in my latte i did not choose to eat/drink your shit c) it was the best option based on what i KNEW d) hindsite might tell me otherwise

is W wrong... or is it just your opinion?

i only wear shoes from organic, fair trade, shade grown, free range cows.

whether it is your first choice or your last choice. if you buy it, you agree. like climbing...once you tie in, you agree WRONG! No means no, but silence doesn't necessarily mean Yes. no means no...means no agreement...means no sale silence doesn't necessarily mean yes, with also means no sale. yes means sale...means agreement

whether it is your first choice or your last choice. if you buy it, you agree. like climbing...once you tie in, you agree

i was saying nothing about your background. only saying something about your wrong assumption of savage.

it is perfect. in every transaction - the buyer and seller are in agreement.

actually..i take that back. it doesn matter his background. someone that came rags to riches based on hard work and against a lot of odds probably has some more insightful things to say than someone 'privileged' enough to be born into money.

agree on the not caring about the background. i was instead pointing out the judgement on the guy based on a guess, i'm guessing

he worked his ass off... you know nothing about the dude, do you

because he aint the top of the food chain

don't animals poop on your salads before you eat em?

is that what makes em so tasty? mmm..mmmmmmm

unless they live in a quadrant home

whu... were you saying something?

wasn't it boxer that said she knew they wouldn't have enough votes for it to pass....but they needed to send a strong message. what a waste of time and money

it just won't count

you don't get to choose where the bus goes. whattabout those driving hybrid cars? they get a tax cut.

"beggers can't be choosers"

Our right to effect change went by by the minute Bush took office. hmmm...no right to effect change?? whatabout the dem congress?? that was a change voted in. aren't they s'posed to be making changes? they're too busy spraying too. pulling an all-nighter on something they admit won't pass....and wouldn't be binding if it did. What change have they made? Other than majority? Bush does not comply with congress.....he has made that clear. exactly... you and everyone else still had the right to make change...ie VOTE. they did. but the dudes that got voted in aren't following thru. that isn't bush's fault. if you're implying that bush will veto anything that would make a change, ok, but stuff isn't even getting to his desk.

from a very conservative person: it's a dumb ass idea in practice (impracticle) - but a good talking point