KaskadskyjKozak

"Closer" is not a song to fight by, it's a song to f**k by. It evokes a vibe of dirty, grinding, gnarly sex.

not for ME, NOT FOR SC, AND MILLIONS of others. it is acceptable in the mediatised world of the war profiteers.. You're a freaking nut case. Having a military for self-defense is perfectly acceptable, as is a police force. You can sing Kum-ba-ya, philosophize endlessly, and compose blathering poetry all you want, but the bad guys will not be affected. You NEED to have a force and use it at times. When and how it is appropriate is another matter, but you and SC are extremist pacifist nuts who don't even want to defend yourselves. The sane world rejects that idea.

THAT is my opinion expressed. thanx The military IS an acceptable part of our culture.

I assumed Virendra7 launched a Denial of Service attack on the site in protest of the Special Forces Advert.

It's about: 1) whiny bitches complaining about a web site, which is privately run and paid for, accepting $$ from a US Army advertiser. These bitches don't donate cash to run the site, use it freely, and think they can dictate how the site is run. 2) whiny bitches accusing those who support this site accepting said $$ of being "chicken hawks" who will not enlist to fight in Iraq. Can you say "non sequitur". 3) whiny bitches who can't STAND someone's POV that is different from their own. These folks probably go around scratching off bumper stickers that they disagree with on parked cars, and tear down political adverts of their political opponents along the roads during election season. Holy crap....for once we agree. Well said. I will say that I personallythink the ad looks weird and out of place. But it pays the bills, it seems.

And these folks who "had their way" would make excellent boot-licking, quisling collaborators of the said occupation.

"Mama Said Knock you Out"

It's about: 1) whiny bitches complaining about a web site, which is privately run and paid for, accepting $$ from a US Army advertiser. These bitches don't donate cash to run the site, use it freely, and think they can dictate how the site is run. 2) whiny bitches accusing those who support this site accepting said $$ of being "chicken hawks" who will not enlist to fight in Iraq. Can you say "non sequitur". 3) whiny bitches who can't STAND someone's POV that is different from their own. These folks probably go around scratching off bumper stickers that they disagree with on parked cars, and tear down political adverts of their political opponents along the roads during election season.

"Sticky Fingers" My fav is "Paint it Black" though...

"Am I Evil"

congratulations; you have succeeded admirably.

Whatever you say, Frodo.

Huh? You really need to stop smoking crack

Mattp, I'm hardly wrapping myself in the cloak of patriotism here. I'm sure if they'd put up a banner for Walmart, people would be just as torqued, even though, arguably, a lot of people here probably get crap there for climbing trips. How many climbers have I gone out with who stop at the McD's in Leavenworth? How about banner for them? Seems that's part of 'climbing cluture'. Where do you draw that imaginary line? I suppose if the CEO of backcountry.com made some obscene salary that exacerbates the rich/poor wage gap, there'd also be objections to them having ads, even though they're serving this 'climbing culture' you keep talking about but never define. Seems to me climbers are a more diverse lot than you seem to think they are. I'm sure that if the ad had been for the Peace Corps, there'd have been no objections, right? I'll repeat three words mentioned above: pecunia non olet.

STFU, troll!

More like "cowering asshole".

Amen, brother! That's all I see as well. He/it seems to be obsessively compelled to respond to every post of mine, deriving some kind of meaning from that activity to fill his otherwise empty existence.

I was thinking Germany, France and the UK... but yeah, fair enough.

60 years of Europeans not slaughtering each other is already an unprecedented historical phenomenon.

Maybe the Rooster is a moderator on that site.

still don't believe in it?

Invading Normandy and bombing Nagasaki were solutions to end WWII. And we've not gone to war with Germany since, now, have we?

It's the exact opposite, you assclown. Since the dawn of time war has been the predominant solution and perfectly acceptable to almost every culture and nation.

"we"? are the voices in your head all in unanimous agreement on this subject?

You are one stupid fothermucker.