dt_3pin

:lmao: That's fuckdered

I can't believe no one has replied to my post. Everbodiez, look at my post! It's awesome.

LOLERZ. Archie, yer dope!

Blind Melon Are they going to try and tour w/out Shannon Hoon?

Are you proposing a new legislative standard? Only pass laws that will be effective 100% of the time? I suppose it's easier to support an anti-regulatory position by pointing to tragic and media-friendly instances where regulations fall short. The instances (and I'm certain they are out there) where gun regulations deterred violence (or the scope of violence) are probably quite difficult to quantify, and certainly don't provide fodder for media vultures. I really can't see a CNN headline discussing how someone wasn't killed.

thin sure beats out big fake pamela titties.

Spanish supermodels are much more interesting than school massacres and gun control.

You guys are no fucking different. The first thing out of many of your mouths, in reaction to this tragedy, is how guns should be banned. Good point. There is no difference whatsoever between a statement by the president's press secretary responding to a national tragedy and spray on a climbing website in response to the same.

Wow. Your pictures are stellar.

Here is a freak I never agree with but have to here. rip.

That's absurd. The person did the killing with a gun . You can fairly argue that an individual's (and society's) libery interest in unfettered gun ownership outweigh the burden of the occassional massacre, but don't deny that guns were an integral piece of this event.

Oh the sweet irony. Yah...I am not the one who is dissing it. Brah. Que?

Oh the sweet irony.

Backdoor --> office chair, including post-ride shower, = 30 minutes. Sorry for the confusion.

Commuting from Ballard to Downtown involves a bike and about 30 minutes. Commuting from Ballard to the eastside involves being fucking stoopid.

Well done!!!

Am I the only one that doesn't understand this? Translation = Mission Ridge is too steep for smithisheaven

An obvious BushCo lie.

I'm pretty sure it's the otherway around, on account of Satan is probably a top.

I understand that you pasted that quote from a news-service, but it is quite an overstatement. The court did not hold that carbon dioxide is a pollutant under the Clean Air Act. Instead, the Court held that EPA has the authority to regulate carbon dioxide as a pollutant under the Act, and that EPA's decision not to regulate carbon dioxide was arbitrary and capricious because its given reasons were not rooted in the statute itself. EPA must now either promulgate regulations establishing emission limitations for carbon dioxide or give a reasonsed explanation (based on the statute) why it won't establish such regulations. to Justice Stevens

A novel political stance.

Actually, I think its Moby.

With no heart, how does a blood clot pose a health risk?

the swastika he added after the secret service visited really spruced the piece up . . .