Jump to content

snugtop

Members
  • Posts

    1073
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by snugtop

  1. Maybe he's not impotent. Maybe he's just not attracted to her anymore because he watched this.
  2. this look is really taking off...
  3. but I need to keep up with the latest styles...
  4. STFU this thread is about HAIR!!!!
  5. The Leschi Starbucks on Lk Washingon Blvd is full of these fellas. As predictable as the moms in their 40s with the jog strollers (they are probably married to said bike-weenie men) There's a bike/running shop accross the street so they can shop when they're done drinking coffee.
  6. I've heard otter grease makes a good pomade.
  7. I know I know, the shit's dead...so why do I keep believing their BS about protein and vitamin complexes?? I just threw out about $40 worth of the junk. The worst is when I get my hair cut they always bug me about using "professional products." If you -- god forbid -- admit to using Pantene or -- if you really want to evoke their disgust -- a generic conditioner -- they shake their heads like you are the most pathetic loser who ever walked her limp locks in the door and you might as well be slathering peroxide on your scalp every night while rubbing it vigorously with a brillo pad. Admit to using "supermarket products" (although they prefer the singular more pretentious form--"PRODUCT") and you'll spend a half hour listening to them spew forth some pseudo-scientific mumbo jumbo about pH balances that they learned in beauty school, but the real reason is because the salon owners maker them hawk their $20 shampoo -- it probably makes them more $$ than the haircuts. The sad part is I've gotten scammed by this multiple times! I walk out with Aveda--the "envirnmental" company that sells lots of hair shit in tiny little plastic bottles and does not sell refills.... I imagine the males on this site will have never been subjected to this, but you ladies out there, you know what I'm say'n. Thank you for allow this split-ended, volumeless, bodyless, protein-free-tressed-top to post.
  8. that say they can restore damaged hair. They can't!!
  9. I have to agree with you though. I see these types on Lake Washington Blvd all the time. I've noticed it's 80% men who fit this description.
  10. Does your bike have a banana seat?
  11. nice to know the ladies of cc.com share such a favorable view of women.
  12. snugtop

    Spokane Mayor

    Even if the allegations of molestation turn out to be false (although unfortunately it seems the statute of limitations has passed and he won't be tried in court) he's a hypocrite (he now admits he's gay even though he's promoted an anti-gay agenda for years) and totally unethical. I hope the recall works.
  13. It's a weekly paper. And it's printed on pink paper
  14. This column ran in the 5/9/2005 edition of The New York Observer. He coins a term I like--"religionist" Calling All Pagans: It’s Time to Fight Back! by Nicholas von Hoffman En garde! A piece of treacherous language has made its way into our public discourse. Where once words such as “religion,” “Christianity” and “Judaism” were heard, public figures now speak of “persons of faith” or “people of faith,” “the faith community” and “faith-based.” Moreover, anything “faith-based” is axiomatically good, and anyone who questions the presumption is axiomatically bad. These expressions divide us into believers and nonbelievers, with the believers or persons of faith enjoying not only an alleged numerical majority but a moral superiority as well. It follows that anyone living outside the community of faith is a bottom-dwelling, life-hating, secular pederast destined for pain eternal in the land of Tophat. Saints and sinners are being lined up and divided everywhere. Have you seen Robert Novak on TV telling all who will listen the whys of his becoming a Roman Catholic? Woe to him who cannot claim membership among the faithful. The term “people of faith” has come to be used interchangeably with the word “American.” If there’s a politician left in the United States who doesn’t season his speech with tremulous references to the “peoples of faith,” I can’t recall his name. The Democrats—who are supposed to have a weakness for killing the unborn and sexually assaulting the underage—have given up their advocacy of vice and perversion; they, too, now speak in deferential tones of the “people of faith,” whose votes they seek to corral by pious faces and reverential references to “the God of us all.” The expression “people of faith” conveys the idea of a holy (or not-so-holy) alliance of religions, united for good against the disorganized forces of anarchic relativists, secularists, and people of little or no faith. They have values—a good thing. The rest of us (few in number though we may be) stand for what is destructive of hearth, community and country—a bad thing. The people of faith are sympathetic to the Republican Party and its objectives. Democrats, intimidated by the religiosity loose in the country, have come to accept the premise that the test of public policy is how a measure is greeted by the faith community. At the rate the faith juggernaut is moving to govern the nation, the once-red-hot liberal patootie, Hillary Rodham Clinton, now a wifely Mrs. Hillary Clinton, will soon be campaigning against Roe v. Wade. Judging by who Ms. Clinton was in the days of yore as against who Lady Clinton is nowadays, you would have to agree that faith can pass miracles. Hillary is not alone. Can you think of a single person of stature in public life who dares to challenge the people of faith? Maybe a shock jock here or there has the onions to take on this coalition of the altogether too godly. Nobody else does. The closest thing we have to organized opposition to the religious domination of public life is Americans United for the Separation of Church and State—but though their geeky hearts are in the right place, I wouldn’t want to speculate on the location of their heads. Battling the appointment of faith-based judges and preventing public buildings from being festooned with Bible quotations is well and good as far as it goes, but it isn’t far enough. Somebody or something has got to start battling religion itself. God is the enemy—meaning the God locked up by organized religions and guarded by ministers, priests, rabbis, popes and mullahs. This is not a struggle to be carried on in the law courts and the legislatures. Religionists are crawling in everywhere, swarming the schools, movies, medicine and research labs. Their intent is to install a faith commissar to oversee every major social institution. We don’t need lawyers here; we need fumigators. We need people in HAZMAT suits to go in and smoke ’em out. We need people to stand up in public against the Christo-Islamic alliance’s assaults on relativism. It’s been more than a generation since anyone with access to a significant pulpit stood up for relativism. The clerics have made “relativism’ into a dirty word instead of what it actually is: a term for the application of reason to public affairs. Turn your back on relativism and you get absolutism. Show me a true believer and I’ll show you a bigot. Absolutism is at the heart of every religion—our dogma or nothing. The absolutist foundations of every faith preclude compromise, adjustments, deal-making, pragmatism, the changing of opinion, the admission of new evidence—all the tools necessary for running a complicated, polyglot, poly-religious, poly-ethnic, poly-cultural modern, science-based, technology-dependent society. The absolutism that underlies religious faith closes the door marked “Reason” and opens the door labeled “Holy War.” There was a time when the evangelical Calvinist form of the Christian religion was so prevalent that it could run American society with some success—but that was 200 years ago. Even then, people of non-faith tried to beat off the religious prohibitionism that strove to close the country down on Sundays, to suppress music, dancing, baseball, Sabbath smooching and the joy of life and replace it with on-your-knees worship and clerical rule. The coming of large numbers of Roman Catholic immigrants touched off the public-school wars of the 19th century. Religious absolutism being what it is, the fight over whose dogma and morals were to be inculcated into the students had to be resolved by kicking all religion out of the schools. That never completely happened, but at least God was pushed into the corner with the elimination of school prayer and the exile of religious symbols and activities. Recently, though, God has been making a comeback—and God help us all if He is successful. The alliance among the various religions embraced by the people of faith is a tenuous one; in the end, every religion hates every other religion. The day before Benedict XVI was elected, The Wall Street Journal ran a front-page article about how Islam was converting people faster than the Catholic Church—which, rousing itself from a certain evangelical torpor, was starting to say, “No more Mr. Nice Guy! We can’t let the towelheads get ahead of us.” (The language used, of course, was more decorous, but the meaning was there.) The triumph of absolutist faith over relativism, of religion over secularism, will start up a new era of religious strife, if it hasn’t already begun. The history of religious contention in the West does contain instances of peace, moments when religions signed truces and stopped the warfare, but social peace didn’t prevail until religion was booted out of the marketplace, driven out of the halls of power and sealed up in private homes and places of worship. Religion in private may be a good thing; religion in public is a menace. In the U.S., with a growing Muslim population, a super-energetic Jewish population and an increasingly crazed Christian population, it is but a matter of time before the “people of faith” coalition falls apart and we get down to some good old-fashioned religious throat-slitting. Religions are tolerant only when they lack the power to be otherwise; turning the country over to one of them or all of them combined is daft. Historically, the people of faith have a war-crimes record longer than your arm. A good guess would be that only a minority of the population is infected with virulent forms of faith. But it’s an organized minority, awash in money. We of little faith and less zeal are neither organized nor rich nor eaten up with a need to proselytize, and therefore we are without defenses against God’s putschists. To stop them, we don’t have to pass laws. It’s not vital to get “under God” out of the Pledge of Allegiance. What is vital is that we, the faithless, raise a hullabaloo every time the people of faith play the family-values card, every time they claim that their faith puts them at the head of the line, every time they presume to decide what we should see, hear and do. What is vital is that we bray, honk, whinny, oink and screech at every public assertion that superstition trumps science, that they’ve got a god and that those of us without one are no damn good. Shout out the facts: They put “in God we trust” on the money, and every year it’s worth less than it was the year before.
  15. snugtop

    favorite poem

    Here's another one I like, by Elizabeth Bishop: The Art of Losing The art of losing isn't hard to master; so many things seem filled with the intent to be lost that their loss is no disaster. Lose something every day. Accept the fluster of lost door keys, the hour badly spent. The art of losing isn't hard to master. Then practice losing farther, losing faster: places, and names, and where it was you meant to travel. None of these will bring disaster. I lost my mother's watch. And look! my last, or next-to-last, of three loved houses went. The art of losing isn't hard to master. I lost two cities, lovely ones. And, vaster, some realms I owned, two rivers, a continent. I miss them, but it wasn't a disaster. --Even losing you (the joking voice, a gesture I love) I shan't have lied. It's evident the art of losing's not too hard to master though it may look like (Write it!) like disaster.
  16. snugtop

    favorite poem

    A fine troche. I was hoping he'd keep going...
  17. snugtop

    Anonymous folks

    Some people go anonymous because it would cause too much of a stir if they were seen on the site. Squid, for instance, recently went invisible. Msybe cuz every time I saw him online I sent him PMs. Either that or they are ass.com lurkers
  18. snugtop

    favorite poem

    If more people don't respond I'm gunna have to trot out the Collected Works of the Vogons, Volume 1...
  19. snugtop

    favorite poem

    what's yours? There must be some literary sprayers out there. Here's one I like a lot by Philip Larkin, from 1943: Love, we must part now Love, we must part now: do not let it be Calamitious and bitter. In the past There has been too much moonlight and self-pity: Let us have done with it: for now at last Never has sun more boldly paced the sky, Never were hearts more eager to be free, To kick down worlds, lash forests; you and I No longer hold them; we are husks, that see The grain going forward to a different use. There is regret. Always, there is regret. But it is better that our lives unloose, As two tall ships, wind-mastered, wet with light, Break from an estuary with their courses set, And waving part, and waving drop from sight.
  20. snugtop

    Email Poll

    All you cube slaves out there... 1) How often do you check personal (non work account) email per day (including webmail)? 2) Does your company have an acceptable use policy for the internet that forbids or restricts personal use of the internet? If so, do you worry that they monitor your activity/usage?
  21. In this day and age, with the dangers of unprotected sex, men who cheat should be castrated.
×
×
  • Create New...