Jump to content

archenemy

Members
  • Posts

    12844
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by archenemy

  1. Unda what?
  2. Automatic disqualification for you if you have to ask that question.
  3. Hey, anyone out there need a climbing partner? I can't seem to find one....I am especially interested in the "hardpersons" variety.
  4. I have a Beal and I don't care for it. The problem is that the sheath frayed here and there right away. Even though it is superficial and the core is fine, I don't like looking at it and wondering if I want to trust my life to it. I won't get another one. Ever.
  5. It's thursday, i'm not that sharp on thursdays you'll have to help me out a bit , or in the morning, or after . Pretty much, tuesday afternoon, i'm sharp on tuesday afternoons! How close of a reading would you like?
  6. Some of it is. oh yeah? like which part of the science is "liberal propaganda"? It was not suggested that "some of" the data portion of the science was "liberal propaganda" (although, we all know data can be manipulated if desired), but, that "some of" the reports of attributable affects are exagerated; this is promulgated by both the Left and Right. If you swalllow everything you hear and read as credible and are unable, or unwilling, to discern apart from political alignment implausibility, you will follow many primrose paths. You've witnessed many flamboyant scientific claims by both the Left and Right on this subject. I suspect you've read more into my statement than was there... again. Wherever people and money are involved, there is bias. playing on words again ... individual bias cannot explain that 99.99% of the science says warming is real... No, money and people is a very effective formula for bias. Don't you question who funded research and speculate of bias if the results are not acceptable to you? Also, my statement reflected on the folly of those that write-off all of the data as "liberal hogwash"; it should be easy to construe my acceptance of the reality of global warming. It seems your biased judgment of me inhibits your interest in understanding what I write. There can be no doubt of an affect, it is the great extent that has yet to be quantified... doubtful it ever will; quite a complex equation, probably with variables yet to be known and defined. source (reputable, please). which greenhouse gas? certainly not CO2 (pinatubo was in 1991): http://www.magazine.noaa.gov/stories/images/maunaloacarbondioxide.jpg Sorry, don't remember the study. I read it sometime around '95. Well, you've matched my "study suggested" statement with a patent claim. Very bold considering your claim requires at least three orders of magnitude more conjecture on the emissions from volcanoes in the last 150 years. I agree. I just wanted to quote something with this many quotes in it.
  7. Or the sheep sounds in the back row...
  8. Apparently they weren't big enough to keep his hunny interested. Great story though!
  9. Then how do you know what is important? I am honestly curious.
  10. Read my avatar quote.
  11. YUP, Fuck his friends, This is especially effective if you fuck all his chick friends that he's been trying to bag.
  12. Good enough. Problem seems to be that ya'll don't know how to recognize what's important and what's not.
  13. I can hear Greg screaming in his boots.
  14. That took me back to my childhood....
  15. But you have to work with a guy who watches American Idol.
  16. Definition of Engagement ring: By modern convention, the ring is usually presented as a betrothal gift by a man to his prospective bride while or directly after she accepts his marriage proposal. It represents a formal agreement to chastity and a future marriage.
  17. you mean like sex ooolaalaa
  18. archenemy

    Could it be?

    now
  19. Oh no! the bias in science thread is baaaaack
  20. Yeah. And be sure to have premarital sex while you're at it. But wait, who in their right mind would fuck someone who uses AOL?
  21. archenemy

    Could it be?

    Polly wants yer crack Ok Stop.
  22. 3 year engagement? Sounds like somebody was not really into making the final dive into marriage...or it could be the both of them. Who gets engaged for 3 years? People who can have premarital sex.
  23. archenemy

    Could it be?

    Polly gets a cracker -- there is no afirmative action for pirates.
  24. I love being humiliated in front of an audience. Remember, you can't run when cuffed to the bed!
×
×
  • Create New...