archenemy

nah, you really don't...think about the ramifications of it... i can think of only one hypothetical situation where i'd go out of my way to kill someone in cold blood... self defense is a little different... There are no ramifications of just wishing. Doing is another story.

XX=20 but XXX more my style

With something sliding out between them. Bleech.

I do.

And if you can last over 20 minutes.

Probably to smite them for those lame cards. Heathens.

yeah--she told me she got your PM

Girlfriend, you rock. I've always had a thing for short guys!

"I think it's more important to put Christ back into our war planning than into our Christmas cards," said the council's general secretary, the Rev. Bob Edgar See, it's all about priorities.

I'll loan you some of my Satan worshipping death metal to balance out the office tunes.

The underlying assumption in the last statement is that women are looking for socioeconomic gain. What I propose is that this assumption is no longer as predominant as it used to be. The reason for that is obvious: women had not yet won the freedom to work in lucrative fields, and therefore had to depend on a man to be financially secure. This is no longer true. So change the fucking assumption. Actually most women that I've talked to about this have said something to the effect that it's the drive, initiative, intelligence, industriousness, charisma, etc that result in a high socio-economic status that are attractive - not necessarily the money, fame, or whatever. Sort of like the impressive-plumage-as-proxy-for-good-genes dynamic at work in bird mating, etc imo. I agree with that--good observation. There is something fundamentally different about people who have ambition. I guess that might be why people don't seem to fall all over themselves for trust funders.

Maybe the Saturnalia

I just read an article on this--I am not an expert but I remember it saying that for all teas and sodas, you end up with a net positive result. Only strong diuretics get you the negative net result.

No, just screwing.

Are those little Meth Mountains?

Most holidays are not mentioned in the Bible: Easter, Christmas, Weekend, your Birthday, Mother's Day, on and on.

The underlying assumption in the last statement is that women are looking for socioeconomic gain. What I propose is that this assumption is no longer as predominant as it used to be. The reason for that is obvious: women had not yet won the freedom to work in lucrative fields, and therefore had to depend on a man to be financially secure. This is no longer true. So change the fucking assumption.

Don't get hooked--its about $40 a bottle

actually i can think of conversations i've had with my male friends where a woman's wealth was considered making her more attractive as a partner. maybe we're just liberated men or something. You're smart. And you should post their phone numbers.

No mystery: men are wired as visual creatures. CBS is right on this one. Duh, no mystery at all you idiot. ALL HUMAN BEINGS use sight as their primary sense (unless they are blind).

I think it's called "patronization." I think it might be called avoidance.

I can't help but notice that whenever a discussion that might touch on something a guy fears comes from a female, guys immediately label that woman as angry. I don't see this happening to males.

Really? Did he say "for most black people" twice like that? We honkys just don't listen.

Hey, is this thread drift? Or are all these things experienced with a girl under 20 around?

You just don't get it. It is not "wisdom" when it is wrong. And you didn't try to get the discussion going, you were restating what you believe. You can't seem to get it through your head that it is not "generally true" that any chick wants to be financially dependent. And most don't want a man who can't maintain gainful employment either. This is very simple to understand. It is time for a data dump in your old head. Reread Fender's post--it is very clear.