archenemy

He has not stated anywhere that he believes this. Furthermore, he doesn't sound like he is a one-dimensional thinker on the subject.

handkerchief I ended up tying it around my head at night to lessen the damn mosquito bites. I sleep warm and just kept pulling off my knit hat at night and would wake up with bites all over my forehead and scalp. I ended up pulling it over my eyes to keep the light out as well and got great nights sleep after this discovery. My hanky saved me.

If this is true, and the tree is down low enough, I can bring my chainsaw up to it this weekend. Let me know.

It is amazing to me how collosally stupid people can be. Even though I can't read Kevpwn's response, I'll bet a day of free belay slaving that it is a perfect example of the stupidity I am referring to.

I know people that believe this to be true. Quit talking about yourself in 3rd person. and please stop reffering to yourself as "my precious" Seahawks.....I know folks who actually believe that. They will give you videos to watch that will lay it out for you that the Trade Center was rigged with bombs everywhere. Crazy shit. My precious? Is that not what you call your penis. I know. I hope they are just trying to get people stirred up. If they beleive that shit they need to be check into mental institution. That why it makes it hard to take the real left serious. Sometimes they are just F'ing nuts. If they were just more real about things it would be better. Gee, how do we know that these people who made these conspiricy videos on 911 are not right? THEY ARE STILL ALIVE! Can any normal person honestly believe that our gov't worked to kill and cover up 3000 people but then let a couple of filmakers live to tell their stories about how they discovered this gov't conspiricy? Duh.

I agree with what you are saying. I am also assuming they are individuals just like us and can take a bit of shit. One thing I notice, when we are out there, we all tend to figure out how to get along--even if that means avoidance, changing one's plans, whatever. We all agree that being outside is in everyone's best interest and the more involvement in outdoor sports the more support our parks and wilderness will get.

Or, you can drop by Fred Meyer's and pick up the hunting regs. Private land is marked out with slanting lines over the area.

Mounties are allowed to use public resources just the same as everyone else. Be sure you bring your camara--we need some new photofodder.

just like that chick who was stoned. I mean, they both should have been wearing a burqa. And, just in case that burqa got ripped off by an angry crowd or an angry husband, they should have been mummified with duct tape underneath. Obviously they were loose women and deserved their punishment.

Immigration only works when the immigrants adopt the rules and the language of their new country.

nothing personal, but that photo is a little bit scary.

No, thank *you*

Because you have worked with abused women you know that there are two mostly likely life threatening times for them: 1. when they leave 2. when they press charges so it should make perfect sense to you why she was reluctant to press charges. This very issue is why many states recently (w/i ten or fifteen years) changed their laws so that the state can press charges again domestic abusers and the victim doesn't have to.

They can feel bad about being short longer than I can feel good about being tall. I'm ok with that. But you got a lot of "ugly" to contend with... You obviously haven't seen him in real life.

maybe she was anesthetized...

I see a resemblence

What does that mean?

Let them police there own people. Just do what you did in the cold war. Mutual destuction if a bomb goes off here. take out lets say the top 50 muslim holy cities. Bad idea but how else? I am not an expert on Cold War history--frankly, I have just not been interested in Russia. But I from what I remember from economic history books (layman's books only) the Cold War was over not mainly due to the disarmament talks (there stuff was getting old and crusty anyway) but b/c of economic measures we took after the detente (or whatever fancy word they use for stopping that idiocy). So I don't see this working for two reasons: first, the fundamentalist groups in the Middle East don't want our capitalist lifestyle and our comsumerist culture. The regular people over there may, but they get beat down for speaking up. second, they don't have a nuke; hence, it ain't mutual.

We aren't talking about DeC here, we are talking about Americans as a group.

I think that came as a shock to folks as well.

If someone wants to pick up my two large tarps from Olyclimber and use them for the Ski-in, they are welcome to.

At least the kid will have a chance at learning to read.

I accepted that early on when I decided Archie had gotten it on with Veronica. I've had better.

The Iran comment was part 'stone' because I could guess that it would piss you off, but that does not make it meaningless. Iran is a country where the notion of engaging in a holy war may be perfectly acceptable. Here, I would argue, it is not, or at least shouldn't be. I know that they see it as a holy war that is centuries, even millenia old. But that doesn't mean that our government should, or that it is at all in our interests to buy into the religious aspect of these crimes. I am just being touchy--I get that way about the whole patriotism issue. It's my bad for reacting that way--seems like its something I should examine within myself. I don't find engaging in war acceptable. Necessary under extreme circumstances, but never, never, never my first choice. And although I do see this war as being characterized by religious/social disagreement, I also see man other things that impact this conflict: oil, money, territory, soveignty, dick size, retribution, etc etc. But when I look at the whole picture, I can't help but think that the fundamental difference in our basic belief systems fuel this conflict more than anything else. I can't stand up and say that is how it is, but I certainly can say that is the explaination that makes the most sense to me and carries more weight than the other contributing factors.

I'm talking about your willingness to buy into the idea of a religious war. And mind you, I did not cast the first stone between you and I in this thread. So we're throwing stones rather than debating? No wonder I am having a hard time understanding you. While talking about my willingness to "buy into" a religious war, I am sure you are examining your own reasons for your refusal to see it as a religious war.