Crux

I jus feel it. What she said. Never tellin' when some bitch gonna lock you up just fer calling her a bitch. Next thing, she dials 911 and yer screwed. No way we should allow that. She telling the cops that she's scared of you, screaming she's a bitch and all. Next thing, the cops taking you to jail 'cause some libtard federal law that breaks the constitution anyway. Main thing, we can't be letting a bunch of uppity bitches pull this shit. Things are bad enough already. Sorry you bully raytards don't get it, mister.

I agree wit efferthing she say'd. An I like teh part about constitutional best because it gets down to it, unlike some.

Good luck with that.

If I'd lied to get my Eagle, would I be a bum today?

Well gift-wrap an English degree and call me a DBA! Can match.com rilly make me feel so special?

And here I was thinking DD is FW, only now divorced and very dummied down.

Working the NOC shift w/ TV on in the background; conservatard pundits saying NRA types are insane. WTF is happening to this country? Is a good ole 'merikin gonna hafta move to some place like Somalia or Pakistan or Texas to find freedumb, or what?

We won't support the evil doers now that it's time to take our country back! We won't support the liberal agenda by giving votes to their big-government system! And we will stand up for what's right, and spread the message: WE WILL NOT BE BULLIED! Fox, NEWS! Fox, NEWS! Fox, NEWS!

...but he can see the Milky Way!

Rights threaten our freedom we need guns to prevent that.

A *successful* ban on assault rifles will come to pass, starting with legislation that outlaws the weapons and provides a spectrum of interventions to be implemented over time, to the ends that such weapons are mostly removed from our general population and we enjoy a more civil society. Sure, success won't come overnight. It will take time, probably decades. But we can do it, and we certainly will. It's our future, as well as it were already written.

Yes, but nobody gets to choose their parents.

Live Strong Sociopathically

Planting bullets in your yard will only embolden the blackberry vines. Maybe it's time you sought professional help with this?

So, what you're saying is you're against us having guns. Got it.

There is nothing about my statement that in any way contradicts anything I've posted up-thread. Are you really this obtusely clueless? of course it's bullshit what you state. Actually modern medicine is good at two things: fixing trauma and controlling mass infections. You can implement isolation and preventive measures (like wearing masks). Travel can get restricted during emergencies as well- vide 9/11. I am sure people nowadays live in open trenches year round eating about one meal every other day. Comparing 1918 pandemic to modern times is just plain stupid. Men between 16 and 40 were on front lines of the conflict, living in trenches for years, mostly eating poorly and under constant stress. Saying that under such circumstances anyone can have a "robust immune system" shows utter lack of understanding basics of human biology and any knowledge of history of the era. The same way one could argue cholera is also a threat. Yes, we had an outbreak- in Haiti after the huge earthquake. If you represent scientific community of this country, no wonder that 50% of Phd's in the US are held by foreign nationals. Looks like you can't even comprehend basics. In 1918, for the flu that killed more people than did the world war, it didn't matter whether or not a person's immune system was subject to independently compromising factors, such as the case you cite for soldiers who were in the trenches. The epidemiology on this is quite clear: Children and the elderly were comparatively unscathed by this flu. You cite trench-warfare as a confounding outlier that skews all findings about the epidemiology of the 1918 flu, but even in populations completely removed from trench warfare, those who were struck down, blood frothing from their lungs, were of prime age for mounting a robust embrace of life, for defending themselves, for taking on most any objective you can imagine. Typically, it's children and the elderly who are most vulnerable to attack, by anything; and by infection they tend to be the most vulnerable because their immune systems are not yet fully developed (children) or are compromised by the processes of senescence (seniors). To emphasize: With the 1918 flu, this was not the case. This strain killed most those individuals who were most capable of putting up a fight. Paradoxical, yes. Factually true, also yes. And the stark conclusion that follows is this: With influenza, not even the most vital of our species can be counted upon to survive an epic attack.

Say that ten times as fast as you can....... Kevbone Kevbone Kevbone Kevbone Kevbone Kevbone Kevbone Kevbone Kevbone Kevbone That that that that that that that that that that What cytokine of way is that to talk? You otta getcher mouth washed out with interferon.

This is not the droid you are looking for.

Controlling Himalayan Blackberry in the Pacific Northwest

Cough syrup is way, way better than lighter fluid. Just sayin. Except for zombies maybe. Does that count?

What kind of gear is optimal for teh Fiscal Cliff? That Howard Dean guy seems to know a lot about the route. Did he do first ascent descent? Who is Clinton? Was he a famous peak tea bagger? Please help.

Bump!