j_b

what's your problem little man.

...

hey kiddo, why don't you go learn your knots or something. if you don't have anything of value to contribute to this thread, you know the way to spray

I think he'll be fine, doc. You a psychiatrist? nope, but i undoubtedly have a better idea than you do of the psychie required for an extensive solo trip. anyhow erden doesn't have to answer questions he does not like. it just seems that an open discussion of fear could be beneficial to anyone reading this board.

don't paint god. 1MB rm file

perhaps you ought to think of new material when you reply to my posts? has that ever been posted in the history of cc.com? je pense que non. it appears we recall things differently. anyhow, you may have to think of something else next time then (and neener-neener or it's equivalent is probably not a good option)

rowing across a few oceans seems like a lot of work, both physically and mentally. how do you think your psychie is going to hold up? do you have any fears?

My beef with the j-b tool is posts like this one above. He's always crying and whining and pissy-faced that big bad trask is kicking sand in his face. Fuck you pussy, if you were in my neighborhood as a kid, we'd have laid waste to your sorry ass. some of you plan to continue harassing me whatever i do. we'll see ... btw the more your replies make you appear as the dimwit that you probably are, the better. http://www.e-dition.net/dimwit.html

judging from posting frequency alone, it is obvious which one among us does not have a life. and i won't even mention content

Why can't he use HIS recycled shit when you post your stupid recycled shit? perhaps you could point out what part of my initial post is recycled?

perhaps you ought to think of new material when you reply to my posts?

yeah right! it's not filled with obscenities and put downs so it can be humorous

and i am told i don't have a sense of humor

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/10/14/1065917413085.html Fiji village to apologise for eating English missionary October 15, 2003 Residents of a remote Fiji mountain village, in which an English missionary was killed and eaten 136 years ago, will offer a traditional apology to the man's descendants next month. The Reverend Thomas Baker of the London Missionary Society was killed by the people of Navatusila on July 21, 1867, after he took a comb out of a chief's hair. It was, and still is, forbidden to touch the head of a chief. He was subsequently cooked and eaten and is the only known white victim of what was once known as the "Cannibal Isles". One who took part in the feast was quoted in contemporary accounts as saying "we ate everything but his boots". One of his boots is in the Fijian Museum in Suva. PINA News said Ratu Filimoni Wawabalavu, the chief of the Navosa district in the central mountainous region of Viti Levu, had invited Baker's descendants. Prime Minister Laisenia Qarase is expected to be in Navatusila on behalf of the Government. The tribe of Nubutautau believe that they were being cursed for what their forefathers had done and that a traditional apology needed to be made to Baker's descendants. Indigenous Fijians are today fervent Christians.

what a nutty idea what do you think is going to be the most difficult part? good job on the first leg.

you should consider an approach with a bushwack for what is more fun than crashing through wet brush? something like nooksack cirque would be good. the current rain should insure that you can't walk up the creek and avoid the alder. just imagine the cold water running down the small of your back .... yum! hey while i think of it, bring skis. you just don't know what conditions you'll find there.

what you are don't understand is that it turned sour for marylou when dru compared her to monica lewinsky (why did he not nomiate her to be the governator?). considering the history of verbal abuse of a sexual nature that marylou has been getting from some individuals, i can't blame her for her reaction. it was very insensitive on dru's part and certainly warranted an apology, imo (it's not late).

it's because society needs it and, moreover they can. Again, lacking a logical argument, here. A few years ago this guy over in Germany believed that 'society' 'needed' to exterminate an entire race of people. Was that okay to do? This asks the larger question: what is 'society'? I don't believe is this nonsensical myth, personally. 'Society' is, in reality, made up of individuals. These individuals have rights and freedoms; you cannot restrict the rights of certain individuals in the name of 'society' without restricting ALL individuals. At the basis of 'society' IS the individual and the rights of the individual must be preserved if the freedom of 'society' is to be maintained. This is just my opinion (and that of a few Founding Fathers), feel free to proffer yours. the founding fathers also believed in democracy (or some kind of) which hitler did not believe in. folks in this country overwhelmingly decided that a progressive tax was needed to attend to societal needs. end of story.

fun? could you explain to us what makes the following remark 'funny'? seriously give it a try.

it's because society needs it and, moreover they can.

why do you hate women so much trask?

yeah, and they work so much harder than anybody else that the income disparity is completely justified

...

i am curious. is it glacier or water ice?