RuMR

sure buddy...sure...

But that wasn't the situation, was it? That's a very different situation, which might have resulted in a different verdict. Being 'prone to flying into blind rages' (CBS's words and conjecture) does not make one violent or dangerous. Being violent or dangerous makes one violent or dangerous. I can scream at a wall all day long; I'm not sure that warrants being shot, although my wife might disagree. Finally, if you're prone to freaking out, don't carry a gun. If you do carry a gun, freak out, and use it wrongly, then you're responsible to pay for your mistake. If that seems unfair, well, tough toenails. You made the bad call to carry the gun in the first place. Its official.....this thread has hit the .... only because you keep posting stuff like this...

my point is everything is relative...there is a point when a "nonshooter" will become a "shooter"...each is different as to when they reach that point... i personally think that being a state trooper would be almost impossible...they damn near have to wait until they've been shot or believe that they will be shot... what is wrong with the world today?????

Sounds like the man got angry, but did he actually threaten you? He certainly didn't harm you. You would have had no justification to do anything to him, really, much less shoot him. You do have a right to run through a park without being attacked by a dog. That's what civil suits and laws are for, both of which you could have levied on the man had you chosen to do so. Had he actually threatened you, that is a crime also. Off leash fines in Seattle are $500; enough to make any dog owner think twice about letting aggropoodle run around free again. But you chose to do none of the above, so the jerk's probably still out there, messing with joggers. Next time you have a run in with a similar prick, and it sounds like he was every bit of that, I'd suggest doing something about it legally to stop the behavior rather than endulging in Dirty Harry fantasies. Carry a cell, and be ready to lower the boom when needed. why don't you replace CBS in the above scenario, and put one of your kids, under the age of 7 in that picture...or your wife...I woulda pulled the trigger on the dog...fuck your lawsuit... If you weren't so fat you could just wrastle them down to the ground and grind their face into the dirt til they come up with a cauliflower ear. why you gotta be so mean? Its in her blood and because she is a raging bitch. man, you two are horrible to ea other...where's the love??

i'm training now...you'll have to gingerly feed me Suncrisps...they're healthier...

Sounds like the man got angry, but did he actually threaten you? He certainly didn't harm you. You would have had no justification to do anything to him, really, much less shoot him. You do have a right to run through a park without being attacked by a dog. That's what civil suits and laws are for, both of which you could have levied on the man had you chosen to do so. Had he actually threatened you, that is a crime also. Off leash fines in Seattle are $500; enough to make any dog owner think twice about letting aggropoodle run around free again. But you chose to do none of the above, so the jerk's probably still out there, messing with joggers. Next time you have a run in with a similar prick, and it sounds like he was every bit of that, I'd suggest doing something about it legally to stop the behavior rather than endulging in Dirty Harry fantasies. Carry a cell, and be ready to lower the boom when needed. why don't you replace CBS in the above scenario, and put one of your kids, under the age of 7 in that picture...or your wife...I woulda pulled the trigger on the dog...fuck your lawsuit... If you weren't so fat you could just wrastle them down to the ground and grind their face into the dirt til they come up with a cauliflower ear. why you gotta be so mean?

Suppose you have hiked 10 miles. You are a 60 year old man and you are tired. You are wearing a pack, so you can't run. A man is running at full speed towards you screaming, "I'm going to fucking KILL YOU". His fists are raised. You have a gun in your hands. You have already shown the man that you have a gun. He's still coming, not slowing down. He says he's going to kill you. You can't believe he doesn't stop. You can't run. If he reaches you, he might kill you with your own gun. What do you do? i agree with you CBS...however, i don't carry a firearm for the specific reason that if i don't have it, i won't use it and will be forced to find another solution...I would find it hard to live with another's death on my hands... I'm on the fence about where I stand on this case but I will say that I'm not sure I agree with this statement. Do you really think you have to actually be hurt to defend yourself? What would it take? Do you have to be struck/stabbed/shot before you can shoot? I think that there are certainly cases where threat is enough to defend yourself. Shoot the guy in the legs or stomach, why go for the chest? Because if you made the decision to "pull the trigger", its for keeps...if i pull the trigger, whatever it is that is on the receiveing end is going to go down dead, period....

Sounds like the man got angry, but did he actually threaten you? He certainly didn't harm you. You would have had no justification to do anything to him, really, much less shoot him. You do have a right to run through a park without being attacked by a dog. That's what civil suits and laws are for, both of which you could have levied on the man had you chosen to do so. Had he actually threatened you, that is a crime also. Off leash fines in Seattle are $500; enough to make any dog owner think twice about letting aggropoodle run around free again. But you chose to do none of the above, so the jerk's probably still out there, messing with joggers. Next time you have a run in with a similar prick, and it sounds like he was every bit of that, I'd suggest doing something about it legally to stop the behavior rather than endulging in Dirty Harry fantasies. Carry a cell, and be ready to lower the boom when needed. why don't you replace CBS in the above scenario, and put one of your kids, under the age of 7 in that picture...or your wife...I woulda pulled the trigger on the dog...fuck your lawsuit...

hey man, GET BETTER...its not summer yet!

lemme guess, you have multiple personality disorder and you are going climbing with one of yourselves...maybe chamonixrad, maybe arc? or, we've all been played by trask...man, i miss that dude...

jens, i'm with h20guy and rafael on this one...just eat what you want, when you want too, but don't be a pig...do some seriously heavy lifting and work your core once or twice a week, spend one day bouldering (with young guys that are motivated) and do some longer stuff on another day...this is enough to "hold ground"...then when spring rolls around you'll be set to climb pretty well... Oh, and for smithisheaven, you actually cut weight to climb low 12's??? WTF??? pick up some technique...one does not need to be strong for low 12's...

hi pink...

just got out of that flick...pretty good movie... history channel had a real outline of the battle of thermopolae(sp?) apparently these actors were trained by dr. doom at gymjones...

she never mentioned whether she knew the person as opposed to your situation (random freak met over the web, sight unseen)... who knows? One person's "grudge fuck" might be someone else's "sport fucking"...who are you to judge?????

hahahaha definitely ethics applied only when it was in their favor then it was "damn the torpedos, full steam ahead, only the top matters"...very disingenuous (spelling?)...ethics when convenient are not ethics...

james was a fucking moron and several people had told him this would happen soon enough...not much thought went into his soloing...

classic american foreign policy... -don't consult anyone -go in and declare what's "right" -proceed to attempt the "right" thing with insufficient force and tools -start a multinational brawl oh, wait, my bad...you are talking about some stupid bolts from a bygone era...

WHAT IF YOUR HAPPY WITH THE STATUS QUO? what if you spent a good deal of time to get to that "happy" place for yourself??? This is a pretty arrogant statement that requires a value judgement by the person saying it towards the recipient...this might be part of your problem... oh, and kids change everything...i would not be where i am right now (for better or worse) if i did not want kids from the beginning...

Camping with you’re your girl friend is great…..it’s fucking intents did you mean "fucking in tents" or fucking intense? or both?

best concentration of routes in wa is in squamish...

5.8 moss jugs forever...

mill creek/indian creek...

nice vids!!!!

only way to do it...pretty simple too...its not rocket science either, so don't be afraid...

the whole L_east coast blows chunks...