Fairweather

I guess I just don't consider the posting of chicken pictures and videos as being worthy of response. You're like the guy at a party who is slow to realize that everyone else has already left.

Dude, you have some serious issues.

Um, I don't know how to break this to you Ivan, but in the private sector cost of living increases don't exist. exactly my point, 8-ball - it's not like we crewel-teachers and our hate-mongering unions have been living higher on the hog then ye of the great unEnlightened so....no private employers ever adjust their pay for COLA or longevity of service you say? All wrapped up in the concept of job performance. An idea your WEA pals can't seem to stomach.

Um, I don't know how to break this to you Ivan, but in the private sector cost of living increases don't exist.

How sad that WEA extortion and administrative waste has depleted education dollars to this degree. Someone ought to do something about it--and soon. 'extortion' and 'administrative waste' LOL what a moron! you're certainly a walking billboard for something to be done about the poor state of education That's funny, smart guy.

How sad that WEA extortion and administrative waste has depleted education dollars to this degree. Someone ought to do something about it--and soon.

What does any of this have to do with one person one vote? Is someone getting extra votes? Are corporations (or unions) now casting votes? Please try to answer the question. It's really not my fault if you are too stupid to understand or ignorant to know/learn that 'one person, one vote' entails political equality between individuals, in particular equality to influence political outcomes. Without political equality, 'one person, one vote' is impossible. Now, I know you don't agree with that, but you don't even agree with the concept of democracy. SO who fucking cares what a goon like you believes? In other words, you were just shooting off your mouth without any real grasp of the words you were told by someone else to say. Well done, leftist dupe. Try thinking before you speak--at least every once in a while.

But this isn't what your other avatar is claiming. I'd appreciate it if he (you) clarified or retracted his (your) statement--which is patently untrue--that one person, one vote is not now in effect.

What does any of this have to do with one person one vote? Is someone getting extra votes? Are corporations (or unions) now casting votes? Please try to answer the question.

Does this mean you're not going to answer the question?

Yes, we all know you don't like freedom, but please explain what you mean when you talk about "enforcing" one person, one vote.

The common man has no say whatsoever. j_b and Prole taught me this.

S'what we have already. Well, for those of us who choose to participate anyhow. Your goofy ideas don't look like freedom at all.

I thought Jay_B and Peter Puget were the ones gooing over the "freedom" China has thanks to the free market these days? Did I ask you to talk?

My frenchie picture will have to do. I couldn't find a transmittable image of a Chinese landlord impromptu execution for j_b and Prole to goo all over.

you labor under the illusion that the poor won't reproduce all the depravities of the rich, once in power, or invent a good # of new ways to rape the public till either Exactly.

D-values. About what I thought. Thanks for sharing.

Listen, idiot, you don't know me or what I watch, so don't pretend you do. Don't be too hard on the old guy, KK. In his own mind, at least, he just paid you a compliment. Matt is an unusual brand of arrogance; no doubt about it.

Vacuous.

That's kind of a funny statement since property rights lie at the heart of personal liberty--and at the core of Enlightenment liberalism. My observation is that most contemporary 'libertarians' just want to smoke out and not be bothered. No problem with that, but it's just too bad they don't care about the rest. That said, I'm glad you've taken a renewed interest in what you once called "that tired, dusty old document". Your ego seems intact--and that's really all that matters for our purposes here.

because the poor and uneducated drag down California as well So this is why Democrats win in CA?? I see.

They spent 70% of the stimulus so far Exactly what I said. So why do you think assigning even more $$ would have done it for you & yours? Are you this dumb at work too?

Which is going to be really uncomfortable with the tether running to the Prince Albert that the New Democrats' have installed through his wiener. Um, I think he had his removed a while back.

Why'd they vote down the pot?