Fairweather

I don't recall saying he was a Democrat. Just a libtard.

Libtard Flavor of the Week:

Hmmm, sounds about 80% libtard/20% anarchist to me: http://www.cnn.com/2015/02/12/us/chapel-hill-shooting-suspect-craig-hicks/index.html http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/11/craig-stephen-hicks-atheism_n_6661438.html

I have no idea.

Talk about confusing: A "bisexual" woman, married to a man while practicing a monogamous, heterosexual relationship?

Perfect.

Gene, note that I have repeatedly prefaced American liberal as a contemporary marker (versus classical, Enlightenment, etc). It's very confusing for you, I'm sure. As for the rest, I guess I'll just have to leave it to you to come up with some really interesting stats on left vs right "slander" here on cc.com.

Um, no, Doug, not really. Like Ivan, I don't really care what the libtards (or the thumpers) tell me I should think or what I am allowed to say.

Lies? Like that Oregon libnut governor? or that Libtard hater who killed three people? Where was your outrage, Gene!

Gene, you miss the point of the exercise, which is that libtard political correctness has become so convoluted and confusing that nobody knows what to say or think these days. This was the point of the theater speech reply as well. The fact that you unhinged yourself with the Islam example reveals something about you and your fellow libs that was, well, exactly my point.

Ok, how about "a lot of muslims are terrorists."

Not saying I disagree with you at all re intent here, Pete. As usual, the theme I'm pushing has more to do with the hypocrisy of the American liberal than anything else. For example, these folks typically argue strongly against three strikes laws which, at their heart, apply intent on a meta level. But these same liberals also express a desire to apply intent broadly when the victim resides within a protected class or represents a challenge to the (perceived) status quo. Again, I'm not saying the latter is necessarily wrong--only that liberals generally lack any hint of a consistent view. And not just on this topic. My concern with Crux's predictable simile is that it is used by liberals to beat down speech that may be completely benign or satirical. Imagine a scenario where half the theatergoers didn't make it out of the building in time because no one had the courage to yell "fire" for fear of violating some new contrived or imposed social norm.

Yes, of course. Which is why it's perfectly legal to yell "Fire!" in a crowded theater. "Yelling fire in a crowded theater!" A tired refrain of control-fetish leftists. Never mind that there might actually be a fire from time to time. Sadly, Ivan, your sentiments are no longer true.

Speaking of substance abuse--try to stay on topic there, Sleepy. ...and speaking of Democrat nutjobs, well, I guess it's better to believe in something.

A bona-fide God-hatin R-bashin anti-capitalist ChristianandMoooslim-hatin Rachael Maddow-lovin Huffingtonpost readin atheist with lotsa guuuns surprised you didn't heer. Recon you didn't cuz the librul media only reports on haters they hate and not the hate that questions the narrative. Conservatard killer = hate crime Libtard killer = "parking dispute"

Wow, what a week you tards had!

Favorites Done: Mount Andromeda - Skyladder Mount Adams - Adams Glacier Mount Olympus (with my 15 year-old son) K's Spire - S Face Little Tahoma in Winter Mount Rainier - the 6 easiest routes To Do: More Mt Rainier Routes - Ptarmigan Ridge, Tahoma Glacier, Nisqually Icefall Mt Hood - Sunshine Mt Anderson - Eel Glacier Mt Fairweather - Grand Plateau Mt Shuksan - Price Glacier Olympus from Queets Basin Want to, But Will Never Do: Huascaran Anything over 20k in the Himalayas West Ridge of Hunter Illimani/Sajama Mt Cook NZ

I'd also point out that, contrary to your stated belief above, US Presidents don't have any authority to "create national parks." They do have authority under the Antiquities Act of 1906 to declare National Monuments. These monuments may or may not hold natural landscapes as a component of their mission. And yes, some of these monuments later become national parks by a vote of our elected Representatives and Senators--like Mt. Olympus National Monument did in 1938. This is to say, national parks are still created by Acts of Congress. Sorry to disappoint. Please remember, the dictatorship you desire may have unwanted side effects.

Since John Muir was dead two years before the NPS was created, I'm not sure what to make of your first comment. He was pretty neutral re "mechanical beetles" being allowed in pre-O.A. parks. As for your second quip, well, ain't democracy a bitch. One more reason the current crop of greenies can't be trusted to tend the fire.

Wow, you have an inspiring outlook. Your "see you on the water" comment stopped me in my tracks--and I think it speaks well about your recovery prospects and about you as a person. The climb may be over, but adventure takes on many forms. I hope you post these adventures here.

Just to keep the debate going, why start at Stehekin? Your neighborhood was built on the site of an old growth forest, as were the roads that take you to the mountains. Start local. Good reply, Jason. Our local green parrots here aren't typically known for their deep thinkin'.

Did I use the word "deluxe?" No. You should save quotes for quotes. I think what I did was try to sell a pair of skis here on Jon's website, like, two years ago? Are you really a moderator? or a joke?

Uh, maybe they will because the marketplace needs these skills and will demand it? Isn't this why businesses offer benefits in the first place? Can you give an example of an RN working 36--32--even 24 hours weekly who isn't offered medical benefits? My wife is in the medical field, and anyone working over 24hrs/week gets benefits.

Dude, like, you're not the sharpest knife in the drawer. Not my picture; you missed the point. In any event, just got back from a semi-backcountry adventure at Crystal. Rain and more rain. All my shit is wet.

A corporation with guns and jails. The 1% are mostly govt bureaucrats.