prole Posted December 1, 2011 Posted December 1, 2011 The only good thing you can say about him is he isn't named Reince Priebus. Quote
ivan Posted December 1, 2011 Posted December 1, 2011 alright, per sobo's link, the lapel pin is legit - reckon it just pimps out the standard western businessman uniform of presidents - i'd prefer to see them wearing a denny's hostess getup, personally... (j) No part of the flag should ever be used as a costume or athletic uniform. However, a flag patch may be affixed to the uniform of military personnel, firemen, policemen, and members of patriotic organizations. The flag represents a living country and is itself considered a living thing. Therefore, the lapel flag pin being a replica, should be worn on the left lapel near the heart. Quote
ivan Posted December 1, 2011 Posted December 1, 2011 The only good thing you can say about him is he isn't named Reince Priebus. jesus, that dude's got a name even a writer couldn't invent Quote
sobo Posted December 1, 2011 Posted December 1, 2011 seriously, what a fucking pain in the ass it is to try to get teenage chicks not to dress like sluts/callgirls/courtesans (all that matters is their income level)... ...it's such madness hardly any reasonable person can think - mostly i just try to keep my eyes focused on that back wall ivan, I present to you your anthem. Learn it... know it... live it... Â [video:youtube] Quote
Pete_H Posted December 1, 2011 Posted December 1, 2011 Thank you for your typically valuable contribution, Petey. Must be time to arrange your fingernail clipping jars now. Â Â Well, since your question was apparently asked to recent immigrants I would think its important to phrase your question in a way that doesn't imply that the job of the Supreme Court is to make policy. Â However, arranging fingernail clipping jars is a pretty good analogy for most legal analysis. Â Â Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted December 1, 2011 Author Posted December 1, 2011 (edited) I know you think it's important, darling, but we're busy here, little Petey. Now go play with the other Asbergers. Â Â Edited December 1, 2011 by tvashtarkatena Quote
Pete_H Posted December 1, 2011 Posted December 1, 2011 Yes, busy making "valuable contributions." Â Â Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted December 1, 2011 Author Posted December 1, 2011 You're a Big Boy - you'll get over it. Now go rock yourself to sleep in a corner. Quote
Pete_H Posted December 1, 2011 Posted December 1, 2011 Stop bothering me. I'm busy counting the number of grains that come in a 50 lb bag of rice. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted December 1, 2011 Author Posted December 1, 2011 Post the number so FW can dispute it. Quote
Pete_H Posted December 1, 2011 Posted December 1, 2011 Or so Kevbone can claim its a government rice conspiracy. Â Sorry, please continue with important free speach discussion. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted December 1, 2011 Author Posted December 1, 2011 BTW: 4,400,000 at an average grain weight of 25 mg Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted December 1, 2011 Author Posted December 1, 2011 That's over 38,500 in a single cup of rice. Think about it.  Think  a  bout  it. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted December 1, 2011 Author Posted December 1, 2011 If you want to grok how much that is, take a cup of rice, spill it on the kitchen floor, then loose a coup full of chickens to clean up up. See how long it takes. What's the average number of grains per minute a chicken can eat? Â Be sure to check the voltage on all the outlets beforehand. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted December 2, 2011 Author Posted December 2, 2011 (edited) Here's how it played out:  T shirt worn by a high school student at school  STILL IN THE APPEALS PROCESS    Banner at an off campus high school sponsored function  SCOTUS ruled in favor of the school's ban.    T shirt worn by a high school student at school   SCOTUS ruled against the school's ban.   Edited December 2, 2011 by tvashtarkatena Quote
sobo Posted December 2, 2011 Posted December 2, 2011 Case #1 should be a slam dunk. I cannot subscribe to "SCOTUS's" decision in Case #2. At least "SCOTUS" had their thinking caps on for Case #3. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted December 2, 2011 Author Posted December 2, 2011 The ACLU argued against the ban in all three cases, BTW. Quote
sobo Posted December 2, 2011 Posted December 2, 2011 Sheeee-it, I should be an ACLU lawyer, then... Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted December 2, 2011 Author Posted December 2, 2011 It's cool just to give us money, too, so we can pay our lawyers. Â Cheaper for you. Â PM me if you've got some extra cash on that half time salary and I can fill you in on how that cash will be spent. Â Â Quote
sobo Posted December 2, 2011 Posted December 2, 2011 PM me if you've got some extra cash on that half time salary and I can fill you in on how that cash will be spent.Oh yeah, I got greenbacks just comin' out my ears... Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted December 2, 2011 Author Posted December 2, 2011 A little goes a long way.... Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted December 2, 2011 Author Posted December 2, 2011 Put it this way. We're the only folks who have a serious shot at ending our trillion dollar War on Drugs. Donate to the ACLU now and, who knows? You may even make a profit on your donation based on your reduced taxes later LOL. Â Â Quote
sobo Posted December 2, 2011 Posted December 2, 2011 We'll have to talk. In the meantime, fix me one of yer famous mai tais... Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted December 2, 2011 Author Posted December 2, 2011 Come on over to 'The Coast' and I will, fo sho. Hell, I'm even authorized by my wranglers to buy you lunch.... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.