If guns are outlawed, then...uh...shit...

[ivan]

i wonder what mad max thinks about this very important question? auntie? master-blaster? the wierd guy on the helicopter-thingey?

 

Two men enter; one man leave.

they didn't need guns in the thunderdome, just chain-saws...

[Fairweather]

i wonder what mad max thinks about this very important question? auntie? master-blaster? the wierd guy on the helicopter-thingey?

 

When my body is fully depreciated and unable to climb, I'm gonna build one of those things and summit-hop the Cascade Range.

[tvashtarkatena]

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

 

If you can get over the grammatical fail, and that maintaining a militia will most certainly result in an ATF/FBI raid on your compound, its pretty clear that folks need not worry about having their arms removed.

 

A 2 year old chimp could have come up with something better, (actually, 48 of 50 states have come up with something better) but...

 

HAVE YOU READ IT?????

 

[rob]

Actually, regarding the grammar fail, it's commonly known, that in the 18th century, commas were, much more, popular.

[Fairweather]

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

 

 

 

D.C. v Heller. God, I love the Supremes!

[tvashtarkatena]

It's FunnY that, the Principles with Which, Although readiLy apparent and Therefore Inarguable, Shall so Remain.

[Fairweather]

If you can get over the grammatical fail, and that maintaining a militia will most certainly result in an ATF/FBI raid on your compound, its pretty clear that folks need not worry about having their arms removed.

 

 

 

Ohhhh reaaalllyyyyy?

 

[rob]

If you can get over the grammatical fail, and that maintaining a militia will most certainly result in an ATF/FBI raid on your compound, its pretty clear that folks need not worry about having their arms removed.

 

 

 

Ohhhh reaaalllyyyyy?

 

 

Poor girl. If only she had been armed, then she would still be armed.

[Fairweather]

I'm just glad we'll all be able to keep at least one arm. Who, after all, wouldn't support a limit on arms?

[tvashtarkatena]

Now, here's where we fall into the zone of as yet unexplored stare decisis: balancing the right of a surfer to bare arms versus the right of a shark to bear the same arm.

 

[rob]

What if the shark is pregnant, though? UNBORN SHARK FETUS!!!

[Fairweather]

As long as it's within the first trimester--before the teeth are formed.

[tvashtarkatena]

What, after all, makes a shark A SHARK? Is it teeth? One row? Three? Bits of Billibong stuck in those teeth?

 

One thing is clear: The Founders damn well knew a shark when they saw one.

[Fairweather]

I don't know what I'd do without my favorite arm.

[Fairweather]

And if the government took all of our arms away, then we'd have to rely on them for, well, pretty much everything. Ya know.

[tvashtarkatena]

This was a classic example of an attacker who was able to gain possession of this woman's arm during an assault.

[G-spotter]

If you can get over the grammatical fail, and that maintaining a militia will most certainly result in an ATF/FBI raid on your compound, its pretty clear that folks need not worry about having their arms removed.

 

 

 

Ohhhh reaaalllyyyyy?

 

 

Poor girl. If only she had been armed, then she would still be armed.

 

If I have two pears, and I eat a pear, then I've still got a whole complete pear even though I only have half a pair.

[Fairweather]

I only have half a pair.

[rob]

I only have half a pair.

 

yeah but don't gloat. he totally set you up for that.

Edited November 15, 2011 by rob