Alpinfox Posted November 3, 2008 Posted November 3, 2008 Tell me how you are voting and why. Convince me I should vote the way you do. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted November 3, 2008 Posted November 3, 2008 I voted yes, because I believe in maintaining the unique public spaces that give this city it's identity. They create a whole that is somehow greater than the sum of the parts, but don't ask me exactly how that happens. Plus, it's a no-brainer place to take out of towners. Best I can do here on short notice.... Quote
Alpinfox Posted November 3, 2008 Author Posted November 3, 2008 What about the argument that we are overtaxed as it is and that PPM should pull its own weight? Or the argument that this sort of thing should be included in the general budget and not some special levy? If I read correctly, the PPM Levy would result in an additional $0.10/$1000 tax assessed value. Say your house costs $350k, that's $35 you will be taxed in 2009. Not too bad. Quote
olyclimber Posted November 3, 2008 Posted November 3, 2008 I NOTICE YOU CHANGED YOUR POST AFTER YOU FIGURED OUT HOW BADLY YOU FUCKED UP THE MATH. Quote
Alpinfox Posted November 3, 2008 Author Posted November 3, 2008 I'm going to notify the moderators about your OT post. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted November 3, 2008 Posted November 3, 2008 No. The levy will cost about $37 in 2009 on a median home price of $420K. Still expensive, but still worth it to me (barely). Quote
Alpinfox Posted November 3, 2008 Author Posted November 3, 2008 I NOTICE YOU CHANGED YOUR POST AFTER YOU FIGURED OUT HOW BADLY YOU FUCKED UP THE MATH. Yes, I confused the "total liability" with the "additional liability" of the PPM levy. Good jorb for noticing that and pointing it out. Very helpful and informative. Hippy. Quote
olyclimber Posted November 3, 2008 Posted November 3, 2008 PPSSSSSSFFFFFFFTTTTTTTT RAZE THE BITCH AND PUT IN A WALLMART. REAL JOBS FOR REAL AMERICANS. Quote
Alpinfox Posted November 3, 2008 Author Posted November 3, 2008 Can't they just use some of those metal pigs to prop up the roof and call it good? Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted November 3, 2008 Posted November 3, 2008 (edited) OMFG he's a Rossi plant!!!!! Open for da Bidness! Edited November 3, 2008 by tvashtarkatena Quote
olyclimber Posted November 3, 2008 Posted November 3, 2008 If I can find another source for those mini-donuts they have there, who cares about the place? Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted November 3, 2008 Posted November 3, 2008 His math is as fuzzy as the dewy dog turds that accent the dandelions in front of his Dbl wide. Quote
Alpinfox Posted November 3, 2008 Author Posted November 3, 2008 Anybody besides Trashtvalker and Portard have any input? Quote
olyclimber Posted November 3, 2008 Posted November 3, 2008 WHY NOT? ITS NOW STANDARD OPERATION TO PROP UP CAPITALIST ENTERPRISES WITH PUBLIC FUNDS. Quote
Hugh Conway Posted November 3, 2008 Posted November 3, 2008 I voted no. death to the PDA, Port of Seattle and all of the otehr fuckers Quote
Bug Posted November 3, 2008 Posted November 3, 2008 King county voted down the King dome twice. They built it anyway. Then they built two more stadiums on the pretext that it would make Seattle a destination, a contender, a viable economic downtown. Same logic should apply to a place like PPM that has been around so long everybody knows to go there. Even the little fish shop where they yell and throw fish around is now a famous inspirational place featured in a mvie on how to inspire your employees. Take away and they'll all quit. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.