Jump to content

This what democracy looks like...in America


Crux

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Listen and learn.

This has been carefully orchestrated from the times of Eisenhower who warned the next President that the biggest danger facing the US was the rise in power of the US Military Industrial complex.

Then Kennedy was assasinated. No connection though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

like i was saying.. most terrorism is FAKE. manhattan renov project, uss cole, embassies, london. but it sure does wonder for public opinion control.

With all due respect, I'm compelled to bluntly distance myself from your claim of agreement with Naomi Wolf, as your claim to her agreement is demonstrably not valid -- at no time has Wolf asserted that the events you cite are anything other than genuine acts of terrorism, and she did not assert that most acts of terrorism are fake.

 

The relevance of the first item on the historical list of ten steps said to be consistently employed when open societies are incrementally closed down -- the invocation of a terrifying internal and external threat -- has nothing to do with supporting your conspiracy theories. The point made by Wolf is in how the threat (regardless of whether it is real or fake) is invoked as a rationale to ignore protections against abuse of power by the state.

 

As you mentioned the tragic attack against the USS Cole, please note the presidency of that period did not invoke that event or any other terror attacks of the period as a rationale for subverting the American government, as has the current presidency continuously invoked numerous scary events and situations, both real and fake, to justify its criminal abuses of power extending back well before 9/11.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

like i was saying.. most terrorism is FAKE. manhattan renov project, uss cole, embassies, london. but it sure does wonder for public opinion control.

With all due respect,

 

As you mentioned the tragic attack against the USS Cole, please note the presidency of that period did not invoke that event or any other terror attacks of the period as a rationale for subverting the American government, as has the current presidency continuously invoked numerous scary events and situations, both real and fake, to justify its criminal abuses of power extending back well before 9/11.

 

well..... that staged attack on OUR ship was staged during the elections and used to make people think that we are under attack. the whole ' sale' on 'w' was that the us would be safer if he was 'voted' in....'they" used IT plenty, for subversion.

which is exactly what she is referring to.i have no theories on conspirations. i use facts.she says that fear-mongering acts can be real or fake , i am simply pointing out some of the fake ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i know how dificult it is for good people to actually believe that BAD people are actually BAD and will stop at NOTHING.

 

THEY must be just a little bad, a little worse than me ,right..? mf'n WRONG!!!!!

 

WAIT for the next round o' crap and try believing again.it may take a personal experience for you to see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

like i was saying.. most terrorism is FAKE. manhattan renov project, uss cole, embassies, london. but it sure does wonder for public opinion control.

With all due respect, I'm compelled to bluntly distance myself from your claim of agreement with Naomi Wolf, as your claim to her agreement is demonstrably not valid -- at no time has Wolf asserted that the events you cite are anything other than genuine acts of terrorism, and she did not assert that most acts of terrorism are fake.

 

The relevance of the first item on the historical list of ten steps said to be consistently employed when open societies are incrementally closed down -- the invocation of a terrifying internal and external threat -- has nothing to do with supporting your conspiracy theories. The point made by Wolf is in how the threat (regardless of whether it is real or fake) is invoked as a rationale to ignore protections against abuse of power by the state.

 

As you mentioned the tragic attack against the USS Cole, please note the presidency of that period did not invoke that event or any other terror attacks of the period as a rationale for subverting the American government, as has the current presidency continuously invoked numerous scary events and situations, both real and fake, to justify its criminal abuses of power extending back well before 9/11.

 

What an amusing exhange.

 

V7 is to Crux as:

 

Id is to Ego.

 

Golum is to Smeagol.

 

Etc.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

like i was saying.. most terrorism is FAKE. manhattan renov project, uss cole, embassies, london. but it sure does wonder for public opinion control.

With all due respect, I'm compelled to bluntly distance myself from your claim of agreement with Naomi Wolf, as your claim to her agreement is demonstrably not valid -- at no time has Wolf asserted that the events you cite are anything other than genuine acts of terrorism, and she did not assert that most acts of terrorism are fake.

 

 

With all respect that is due, your vain attempt to distance yourself from those who reside well below the fringe does not lend you mainstream legitimacy. You, sir, still represent the fringe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"jayb to fw?

as usual , you have nothing to say."

 

Except for this, perhaps:

 

It appears as though you are actually *less* discriminating when it comes to the deciding which ideas that you'll embrace than you are when it comes determining which of your female in-laws you'll commingle with - though the dignity of the former surely suffers more than the latter as a consequence of your affections.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"jayb to fw?

as usual , you have nothing to say."

 

Except for this, perhaps:

 

It appears as though you are actually *less* discriminating when it comes to the deciding which ideas that you'll embrace than you are when it comes determining which of your female in-laws you'll commingle with - though the dignity of the former surely suffers more than the latter as a consequence of your affections.

 

that's kind of cute.... however,

those are not ideas, they are FACTS. now, if you had proper sources for your 'information' apart from 'the pentagon says....."or 'the white house is saying...."or cbs has learned that....." you , and anyone with half a brain would say what i am saying.i am risking my life for your benefit.

 

what i do with other adults is not for you to judge, given the limited scope of your understanding in matters of love, romance and the art of self giving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

like i was saying.. most terrorism is FAKE. manhattan renov project, uss cole, embassies, london. but it sure does wonder for public opinion control.

With all due respect, I'm compelled to bluntly distance myself from your claim of agreement with Naomi Wolf, as your claim to her agreement is demonstrably not valid -- at no time has Wolf asserted that the events you cite are anything other than genuine acts of terrorism, and she did not assert that most acts of terrorism are fake.

 

 

With all respect that is due, your vain attempt to distance yourself from those who reside well below the fringe does not lend you mainstream legitimacy. You, sir, still represent the fringe.

 

to the sheep: MAINSTREAM = TRUTH.

jesus was so fringe they nailed him to a cross, yet HE was very RIGHT and holding TRUTH FOR ALL WHO WANTED IT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the contrary - I am quite free to judge at my leisure, since you volunteered the information on a public forum.

 

In my judgment - if your claims are true, which I doubt - you and your female (?) in laws show less virtue, decorum, and restraint than one finds in a typical ferret colony.

 

But - I agree - consenting adults should be free to do whatever they wish to one another, regardless of what anyone else thinks, so have at it.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there is fantasy-world and reality-world. in reality, some women get the love and affection they need as free humans, and not posessions of their male providers. to impart immorality to them is self serving .the secrecy ensures security.

passion is passion , whether it is sanctionned or not. the belief that a married couple's

lovemaking is less animalistic is myth. a mental trick.

 

wrong thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, wrong thread. That would be the thread about democracy in Canada, no?

 

Now, moving back to the topic of democracy in America, what's up with the planned bid by Dennis Kucinich to force a vote in the House tomorrow for the impeachment of Cheney?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...