rob Posted October 25, 2007 Posted October 25, 2007 he should thank his lucky stars that castration is not a punishment for rape, despite the best efforts of some crazy bitches who think it should be so. Quote
Seahawks Posted October 25, 2007 Posted October 25, 2007 "A jury of his peers." OK. How many of his peers on the jury were black? How about the witnesses? % of black prisoners in US jails? % of black prisoners wrongfully convicted? Just wondering. OJ's innocent too. Quote
archenemy Posted October 25, 2007 Posted October 25, 2007 entitled to compensation as a man. In that case, the state ought to work to exonerate women first; it would be cheaper. Quote
kevbone Posted October 25, 2007 Posted October 25, 2007 I am not sure what the law reads in his state. But is he able to sue? Maybe get some money out of it. no amount of money can make up for 22 years in the slammer, but yeah, it would be cool if he could get enough cash to live a comfortable life to ripe old age I agree.....but if he could get a few million for some sort of wrongful imprisonment suit. But I do recall my wife telling me some time ago about a law that protects the state from law suits from this sort of thing…..I think the guy is screwed. Forget the lawsuits, the state should just pay something fair in these cases. Totally pathetic. Define fair? I mean really I would say five million is fair…..others might say wages lost is fair….. average salary in the state for 22 years plus 3x for damages, as I stated above. That seems fair for physical damages, but what about mental damages? How does one measure the affects of 22 years of wrongful imprisonment? Quote
Seahawks Posted October 25, 2007 Posted October 25, 2007 I am not sure what the law reads in his state. But is he able to sue? Maybe get some money out of it. no amount of money can make up for 22 years in the slammer, but yeah, it would be cool if he could get enough cash to live a comfortable life to ripe old age I agree.....but if he could get a few million for some sort of wrongful imprisonment suit. But I do recall my wife telling me some time ago about a law that protects the state from law suits from this sort of thing…..I think the guy is screwed. Forget the lawsuits, the state should just pay something fair in these cases. Totally pathetic. Define fair? I mean really I would say five million is fair…..others might say wages lost is fair….. average salary in the state for 22 years plus 3x for damages, as I stated above. That seems fair for physical damages, but what about mental damages? How does one measure the affects of 22 years of wrongful imprisonment? there is no amount that can replace 22 years of ones life. YOu don't get that back. Quote
lizard_brain Posted October 25, 2007 Posted October 25, 2007 I am not sure what the law reads in his state. But is he able to sue? Maybe get some money out of it. no amount of money can make up for 22 years in the slammer, but yeah, it would be cool if he could get enough cash to live a comfortable life to ripe old age I agree.....but if he could get a few million for some sort of wrongful imprisonment suit. But I do recall my wife telling me some time ago about a law that protects the state from law suits from this sort of thing…..I think the guy is screwed. Forget the lawsuits, the state should just pay something fair in these cases. Totally pathetic. Define fair? I mean really I would say five million is fair…..others might say wages lost is fair….. average salary in the state for 22 years plus 3x for damages, as I stated above. That seems fair for physical damages, but what about mental damages? How does one measure the affects of 22 years of wrongful imprisonment? there is no amount that can replace 22 years of ones life. YOu don't get that back. Free hookers and blow for life. Quote
Bug Posted October 25, 2007 Posted October 25, 2007 You count how many violent crimes he is involved in when he gets out and give him $1000 for each one. Quote
joblo7 Posted October 25, 2007 Posted October 25, 2007 i would say: 2 millions and 2 white-slave-bitches for life. seems fair. Quote
ClimbingPanther Posted October 25, 2007 Posted October 25, 2007 There's too much injustice in the world for everyone to get millions of dollars for it. Like this kid from Chernobyl. NSFTWS (not safe for the weak-stomached) http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20747225/displaymode/1107/s/2/framenumber/8/ Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted October 25, 2007 Author Posted October 25, 2007 Justice: whoever did this should be burned alive. Quote
joblo7 Posted October 25, 2007 Posted October 25, 2007 i believe we were discussing the compensation owed to a brown man wronged by a white society. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted October 25, 2007 Author Posted October 25, 2007 i believe we were discussing the compensation owed to a brown man wronged by a white society. remember, it's not WHAT you think, but HOW you think! Quote
archenemy Posted October 25, 2007 Posted October 25, 2007 There's too much injustice in the world for everyone to get millions of dollars for it. Like this kid from Chernobyl. NSFTWS (not safe for the weak-stomached) http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20747225/displaymode/1107/s/2/framenumber/8/ Wow, the US didn't make the list at all. And with all our hulabaloo. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted October 25, 2007 Author Posted October 25, 2007 There's too much injustice in the world for everyone to get millions of dollars for it. Like this kid from Chernobyl. NSFTWS (not safe for the weak-stomached) http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20747225/displaymode/1107/s/2/framenumber/8/ Wow, the US didn't make the list at all. And with all our hulabaloo. hullabaloo? what hullabaloo? we emit the most greenhouse gases, but we've curbed pollution a lot. we don't even come close to being a horrible polluter on a global scale. countries like China, Russia, and India have a horrible track record in pollution AND a growing amount of greenhouse gas emissions. based on their track record on the former, it's hard to believe they'll seriously look at curbing the latter any time soon. Quote
ClimbingPanther Posted October 25, 2007 Posted October 25, 2007 yeah, I thought "Hanford" ought to have made it, although it's not really a city. by some accounts, the second most polluted radioactive site in the world. not affecting people all that much though, so no news. Quote
archenemy Posted October 25, 2007 Posted October 25, 2007 There's too much injustice in the world for everyone to get millions of dollars for it. Like this kid from Chernobyl. NSFTWS (not safe for the weak-stomached) http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20747225/displaymode/1107/s/2/framenumber/8/ Wow, the US didn't make the list at all. And with all our hulabaloo. hullabaloo? what hullabaloo? we emit the most greenhouse gases, but we've curbed pollution a lot. we don't even come close to being a horrible polluter on a global scale. countries like China, Russia, and India have a horrible track record in pollution AND a growing amount of greenhouse gas emissions. based on their track record on the former, it's hard to believe they'll seriously look at curbing the latter any time soon. And we shouldn't buy anything from BD. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted October 25, 2007 Author Posted October 25, 2007 And we shouldn't buy anything from BD. too late... just bought 3 new C4's a month ago... Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted October 25, 2007 Author Posted October 25, 2007 Woo hoo! Christmas comes early! I'm getting new ski boots for Christmas. :-) Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.