Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

You may recall the hysterics of Crux, MattP, and others from the left here last year when the ABC docudrama "The Path To 9/11" aired. It was viewed by some as an indictment of the Clinton administration's failure to stop Osama BinLaden. At least one of these "freedom-loving" liberals were calling for the imprisonment of ABC execs! Well now it looks like those same evil right-wing media cabal have been suppressing the release of the DVD at the behest of Madame Hillary. Meanwhile, "Farenheit 9/11", "Loose Change", and other garbage circulate freely - as they should - with narry a peep from the loony lefties like Crux & Co. Who really believes in free speech and expression?

 

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/homeentertainment/la-et-path5sep05,0,2302280.story?coll=la-home-entertainment

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Prety weak there, Fairweather. You compare The Path to 911 to Loose Change and Farenheit 9-11? Apparently you forget that you yourself only believed that Mr. Bush the great told lies to take us into Iraq when you saw it with your own eyes on a mainstream media TV documentary! Now, you apparently think Michael Moore and a 911 conspiarcy theory have the same stature as that which finally confinced you of the obvious? :laf:

 

Posted

Yeah, Hillary calls the shots at ABC :rolleyes: . . . more proof that neocon paranoia knows no bounds!

tinfoil-hat.jpg

 

 

 

Caught Bill Clinton on Larry King tonight, so refreshing to see a President that can speak in complete sentences.

Posted
I'll just bet he also knows the difference between a comma and a period.

 

Granted, that is a complex skill set to master, and one which pre-supposes one has actually made it all the way to a period at some point in their adult life. He's clearly a busy man, but there's certainly no reason this couldn't be a lifetime goal for the President after he leaves office.

Posted
I really don't care whether or not the president can impress you with his verbal prowess, as long as he's effectively restricting your freedom.

 

authoritarian freudian? :lmao:

Posted
I really don't care whether or not the president can impress you with his verbal prowess, as long as he's effectively restricting your freedom.

 

authoritarian freudian? :lmao:

 

Huh? No slip at all. It's called humor. I didn't expect Old Joe to get it, but I thought you were a little brighter.

Posted
You may recall the hysterics of Crux, MattP, and others from the left here last year when the ABC docudrama "The Path To 9/11" aired. It was viewed by some as an indictment of the Clinton administration's failure to stop Osama BinLaden. At least one of these "freedom-loving" liberals were calling for the imprisonment of ABC execs! Well now it looks like those same evil right-wing media cabal have been suppressing the release of the DVD at the behest of Madame Hillary. Meanwhile, "Farenheit 9/11", "Loose Change", and other garbage circulate freely - as they should - with narry a peep from the loony lefties like Crux & Co. Who really believes in free speech and expression?

 

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/homeentertainment/la-et-path5sep05,0,2302280.story?coll=la-home-entertainment

 

Fairweather, have you read Richard Clarke's book? He offers quite a different view on it.

Posted
You may recall the hysterics of Crux, MattP, and others from the left here last year when the ABC docudrama "The Path To 9/11" aired. It was viewed by some as an indictment of the Clinton administration's failure to stop Osama BinLaden. At least one of these "freedom-loving" liberals were calling for the imprisonment of ABC execs! Well now it looks like those same evil right-wing media cabal have been suppressing the release of the DVD at the behest of Madame Hillary. Meanwhile, "Farenheit 9/11", "Loose Change", and other garbage circulate freely - as they should - with narry a peep from the loony lefties like Crux & Co. Who really believes in free speech and expression?

 

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/homeentertainment/la-et-path5sep05,0,2302280.story?coll=la-home-entertainment

 

Fairweather, have you read Richard Clarke's book? He offers quite a different view on it.

 

Clark has his own agenda. My point here is that the suppression of freedom of expression by those on the left seems to get a frequent pass at best, and active participation in the case of Crux. Do you really think that ABC would suppress a piece that portrayed Republicans in the same manner? No. The fact that I can't go out and purchase a documentary that portrays a point of view simply because a presidential candidate (and New York Senator - home of ABC) has the power to stop that DVD release is startling. The fact that one side of the political process has that kind of pull and the other does not is even more starling. The fact that the same lefties who claim to be gasping for air beneath Bush's heel are the same ones calling for the imprisonment of media executives is unforgivable. This ain't about the truth, Jon. It's about freedom...and hypocrisy.

Posted
You may recall the hysterics of Crux, MattP, and others from the left here last year when the ABC docudrama "The Path To 9/11" aired. It was viewed by some as an indictment of the Clinton administration's failure to stop Osama BinLaden. At least one of these "freedom-loving" liberals were calling for the imprisonment of ABC execs! Well now it looks like those same evil right-wing media cabal have been suppressing the release of the DVD at the behest of Madame Hillary. Meanwhile, "Farenheit 9/11", "Loose Change", and other garbage circulate freely - as they should - with narry a peep from the loony lefties like Crux & Co. Who really believes in free speech and expression?

 

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/homeentertainment/la-et-path5sep05,0,2302280.story?coll=la-home-entertainment

 

It's such a shame that the liberal media has completely ignored and/or covered up this story. Thankfully, the LA Times, a bastion of conservatism rivaled only by Fox, uncovered The Truth.

 

 

Posted
I thought you didn't like reading fiction Fairweather?

 

...but I don't want some left-wing nanny idiot telling me I can't if I decide I want to. Are you a book burner like your buddy Crux?

 

I'm more the lynchin' type

Posted

911 facts

 

american planes hitting american buildings.

low en stein bought the place 6 weeks before

insured it for dual acts of terrorism (7bil)

pentagon renovated one of its 5 sides, 5 years+- before.

yep that's the one.....

marvin bush was in charge of security at wtc through his sec co.

us mil. ran 3 war games scenarios ,that day. (all hijackings).

only with pentagon hit, was there 'acts of war'.

i saw that building come down and it was rigged/pulled.

i do not believe g.w bush's conspiracy theories of beige people with plastic knives.

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...