dt_3pin Posted April 24, 2007 Posted April 24, 2007 I recommend an immediate retaliatory invasion. The pentagon should call it Operation Leaf Blower. Canadians Hate Freedom Quote
minx Posted April 24, 2007 Posted April 24, 2007 i thought it was a well known fact that all terrorists are canadian. or is that all canadians are terrorists? Quote
G-spotter Posted April 24, 2007 Posted April 24, 2007 What the hell does that mean? It means The_Rooster is a terrorist. Quote
Dechristo Posted April 24, 2007 Posted April 24, 2007 The murder and attempted murder charges state that the acts were carried out "in violation of the law of war." an explanation, please? Quote
EWolfe Posted April 24, 2007 Posted April 24, 2007 Dru terrorizes us all the time. Dru = Omar Khadr?? Quote
Recycled Posted April 24, 2007 Posted April 24, 2007 Perhaps not being a uniformed combatant? Just a guess... Quote
jordop Posted April 24, 2007 Posted April 24, 2007 The U.S. Supreme Court in June struck down the previous military tribunal system at Guantanamo as unconstitutional. President Bush subsequently signed a law creating a new military tribunal system. Can we have a new reality show about people not giving a shit anymore. Oh, wait. Quote
dt_3pin Posted April 24, 2007 Author Posted April 24, 2007 The murder and attempted murder charges state that the acts were carried out "in violation of the law of war." an explanation, please? No doubt. Hasn't BushCo taken the position that the laws of war (e.g. Geneva Convetion) do not apply to the United State's treatment of enemy combatants? But now, those same people are being charged with violating the very rules that they themselves are not subject to. My brain hurts. Quote
jordop Posted April 24, 2007 Posted April 24, 2007 Homeland Security now being used against the war on drugs: http://thetyee.ca/News/2007/04/23/Feldmar/ Quote
Dechristo Posted April 24, 2007 Posted April 24, 2007 The murder and attempted murder charges state that the acts were carried out "in violation of the law of war." an explanation, please? No doubt. Hasn't BushCo taken the position that the laws of war (e.g. Geneva Convetion) do not apply to the United State's treatment of enemy combatants? But now, those same people are being charged with violating the very rules that they themselves are not subject to. My brain hurts. right. This was the paradox that occurred to me. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.