G-spotter Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 Car salesman sues American Alpine Club for noting that his Everest summit is "disputed" All Byron needs to be a mountainspeedclimber is a dog. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirtyHarry Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 He's not only a car salesman, but a motivational speaker too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 And... he's been downstairs in the den eating No-Doze for about four hours. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faster_than_you Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 OMG... What a Nodder. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foraker Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 Who would ever call into question the honesty of a car salesman?.... If you're trying to 'take the high road', what's the lawyer for? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirtyHarry Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 Well, one way or the other, our AAC dues are probably going to go up next year on account of "unexpected legal fees." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faster_than_you Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 If you're trying to 'take the high road', what's the lawyer for? Extra publicity never hurt a car salesman. Remember Cal Worthington? This guy's mantra is could be: "Pursuing truth at altitude since 2000" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 but never quite finding it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 is it possible to sue your way to the top of Everest? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faster_than_you Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 but never quite finding it See, that's the problem Oly! You need a third party verifier to find truth. And then you need a 4th party verifier to verify that your 3rd party verifiers are truly 3rd party. Got that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archenemy Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 and each needs a lawyer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirtyHarry Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 Remember Cal Worthington? Man I still get that asshole's car commercial jingle stuck in my head sometimes. Maybe I should sue him for emotional distress. Frivolous lawsuits are the cool thing to do these days ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faster_than_you Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 and each needs a lawyer. And now you're talking... Anything less than a bunch of verifiers is probably just classified as a "party." It gets really complicated when factor in a few Fidos, Norris and Seagal types... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archenemy Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 Fido smido. His Dog Spot all the way Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fear_and_greed Posted April 21, 2006 Share Posted April 21, 2006 What we need is a decider to decide. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EWolfe Posted April 21, 2006 Share Posted April 21, 2006 This needs to be moved to the sensitive forum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.