layton Posted September 9, 2004 Posted September 9, 2004 Weather.com - the pessimist. Will go from 0% to 60% within a matter of hours. 30% is their favorite per centage! It could be sunny and great or totally raining! Who knows? Stay inside! accuweather.com - the optimist. no percentages, only happy icons that never forecast rain. good for convincing your partner to climb if you have nothing better to do with your time..., "Dude the weather says 'Sun and Clouds' let's go!" Weather.gov -the generalist. Combining the unique weather ecosytems for the entire N.cascades into one vague forecasat. Washinton Pass and the Enchantments totally share the same forecast, dude! Yahoo,Wunderground, etc...the rehash. weatheroffice.ca.ec.gc -It's fun and cute that canadians try to forecast the weather! Of course, there's no mountain weather forecast. Sure is good that the forecast for Hope is aplicable to the mountains above. So what have y'all found to be your fav forecast? I'm prone to go with weather.com as they are the most pessimistic. of course they screwed me outta some good weekends this spring (remember that bullshit?) as did weatheroffice. Quote
catbirdseat Posted September 9, 2004 Posted September 9, 2004 None of the above. Wunderground has been remarkably accurate. Quote
Dru Posted September 9, 2004 Posted September 9, 2004 You forgot to add the good old standard "flip a coin" model - heads it rains, tails its sunny. 50% success rate is only 10% less accurate than the supercomputers! Quote
layton Posted September 9, 2004 Author Posted September 9, 2004 wunderground is just weather.gov rehashed with icons. look at the weather station for the city you look up. could be nowhere near there. Quote
catbirdseat Posted September 9, 2004 Posted September 9, 2004 I don't go by the icons anyway. I go to "Detailed". But yes the cities are the closest ones to the stations. Quote
Dru Posted September 9, 2004 Posted September 9, 2004 Where do you get the 50% figure? MY GOD YOU ARE RIGHT! I forgot the 0.0000000001% chance a coin will land on its edge! So it's only a 49.9999999999% success rate Quote
layton Posted September 9, 2004 Author Posted September 9, 2004 Where do you get the 50% figure? MY GOD YOU ARE RIGHT! I forgot the 0.0000000001% chance a coin will land on its edge! So it's only a 49.9999999999% success rate DRU! Wanna climb somthin'? Quote
catbirdseat Posted September 9, 2004 Posted September 9, 2004 Okay, smartass, I meant the "10% better than 50% "figure or 60% accurate for forecasts. Quote
layton Posted September 9, 2004 Author Posted September 9, 2004 It's correct 60% of the time, every time. Quote
Dru Posted September 9, 2004 Posted September 9, 2004 The persistence model and recurrence model are 60% accurate, and the best computer models are no more accurate than persistence or recurrence at predicting the forecast 5 days from now. Quote
ashw_justin Posted September 9, 2004 Posted September 9, 2004 Am I totally missing the point of another spray thread, or does nobody go by the NWS forecasts, i.e. http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/wrhq/TotalForecast.csh?TotalForecast+WR+WA+017+073+MAPCOORDS^81^18 ? Quote
layton Posted September 9, 2004 Author Posted September 9, 2004 weather.gov is the same thing dumbass Quote
ashw_justin Posted September 9, 2004 Posted September 9, 2004 so it is! I always just linked straight to that noaa.gov site. Anyway you just need to know how to interpret those forecasts for specific areas... I always assume more rain and colder temps than forecasted for the Mt. Baker area. Actually the generality forecasts your motivation better than it does the weather. It always sounds good if you really want to go. Quote
Bogen Posted September 9, 2004 Posted September 9, 2004 You have access to pretty much the same info these professional forecasters do. Look at the satellite maps, barometric pressure maps etc, and make your best guess. You probably won't do any better, but at least you'll have no-one but yourself to blame. Quote
jmace Posted September 9, 2004 Posted September 9, 2004 First of all all of those sites use computer generated icons, even environment canada. The computer chooses what icons to display based on what the forecaster types in, the forecaster also only can type a few words in to the bottom of the space. Second winter time, forecasters can only forecast 3-5 days out with any sucess, summer you can take that to 5-7 tops!!!!! Here on the coast. As bogen says take a look ot the sattelite, that will give you look at whats out there then have a look at the jet stream current and the forecast that will help you in deciding where the storm will travel. As well you will be able to see if there is any ridging in the forecast which will block weather and promote clear skies. Or pay a couple of bucks and phone the professionals for a personal forecast, if your climbing in canada phone Environment Canada and get the goods otherwise keep on looking at crappy websites that are meant for mommies wondering if they should pack a rain coat for their kids. Quote
SublimeSalamander Posted September 10, 2004 Posted September 10, 2004 I vote for Wunderground too. Quote
eric8 Posted September 11, 2004 Posted September 11, 2004 I use weather.com but like to check there local forecast and compare it to what it is doing outside and then reduce the polynmols to get my correct forcast Just remeber it's "sunny above the clouds" aye sheepshagger Quote
Gaper_Jeffy Posted September 11, 2004 Posted September 11, 2004 Read the NWS's forecast discussions. Here is the Seattle Discussion, and here's the Portland Discussion Quote
chris Posted September 15, 2004 Posted September 15, 2004 check out www.wunderground.com I've had a lot of luck with them. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.