jon Posted February 3, 2004 Share Posted February 3, 2004 Presidents who served in wars: George Washington - Commander in Chief of Continental Army during the American Revolution. James Monroe - served in American Revolution Andrew Jackson - American Revolution, War of 1812, First Seminole War William Henry Harrison - Indian wars in the NW territory, War of 1812 John Tyler - War of 1812 Zachary Taylor - War of 1812, Black Hawk, Second Seminole, and Mexican wars Franklin Pierce - Mexican War James Buchanan - War of 1812 Abraham Lincoln - Black Hawk War Andrew Johnson - Civil War Ulysses Grant - Mexican War, Civil War Rutherford Hayes - Civil War James Garfield - Civil War Chester Arthur - Civil War Benjamin Harrison - Civil War William McKinley - Civil War Theodore Roosevelt - Spanish-American War Harry Truman - WWI Dwight Eisenhower - WWII General John Kennedy - WWII Lyndon Johnson - WWII Richard Nixon - WWII Gerald Ford - WWII Ronald Reagan - WWII Gorge Bush - WWII Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodchester Posted February 3, 2004 Share Posted February 3, 2004 Reagan? My memory, which could be incorrect, was that he did not serve and I'm fairly certain that he did not serve in combat. Also, keep in mind, there is a huge difference between JFK and Bush Sr.'s experiences as young Lt.s and the experinece of Clark or Eisenhower, or Grant, or Washington. Not saying the little guys don't count, but there is a big difference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon Posted February 3, 2004 Share Posted February 3, 2004 True, but they served during a long war. Anyways I'm tired of arguing about this. Please vote, I don't care who you vote for, just make sure you've educated yourself on the issue and do it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murraysovereign Posted February 3, 2004 Share Posted February 3, 2004 I thought Reagan's "service" consisted of making recruitment ads and training films. I don't think he ever saw anything like active duty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minx Posted February 3, 2004 Share Posted February 3, 2004 True, but they served during a long war. Anyways I'm tired of arguing about this. Please vote, I don't care who you vote for, just make sure you've educated yourself on the issue and do it. what he said!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dru Posted February 3, 2004 Share Posted February 3, 2004 Recent poll indicates only 15% of Canadians would vote for Bush if they could Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon Posted February 3, 2004 Share Posted February 3, 2004 So that is like 7% American right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodchester Posted February 3, 2004 Share Posted February 3, 2004 Sounds like 7% to me!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murraysovereign Posted February 4, 2004 Share Posted February 4, 2004 I just checked - it works out to 11.25% US at straight exchange, before commissions and fees and such. But you guys keep forgetting about the Countervailing Duties. So add about 37% to keep the Commerce Department happy, and by the time we get across the border we've become 48.25%. Ain't "Free Trade" grand? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willstrickland Posted February 4, 2004 Share Posted February 4, 2004 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whirlwind Posted February 4, 2004 Share Posted February 4, 2004 i have to argue that clinton was a good presedent he just wasn't the best family role model. but is bushII? i think not just look at his girls. by the way durning the clinton admin, are economy was the best it has ever been and he left a surplus of goverment money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HRoark Posted February 4, 2004 Share Posted February 4, 2004 I thought Reagan's "service" consisted of making recruitment ads and training films. I don't think he ever saw anything like active duty. This is true; his eyesight kept him from active combat duty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HRoark Posted February 4, 2004 Share Posted February 4, 2004 i have to argue that clinton was a good presedent he just wasn't the best family role model. but is bushII? i think not just look at his girls. by the way durning the clinton admin, are economy was the best it has ever been and he left a surplus of goverment money. So, you're saying that Bush can't be a good family role model (since when was that part of the job description) because his daughters are typical teenagers/college students? Sounds weak to me. Our economy was the best ever under Clinton? Compared to what? Compared to the '80's, the "Decade of Greed"? A surplus of money? That's a shell game, dude. Roark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodchester Posted February 4, 2004 Share Posted February 4, 2004 (edited) About the Bush girls....most say that my parents did a great job with thier seven kids....and yet we got into WAY more trouble than the Bush girls. Come on, so what if they got busted for drinking some beer while underaged... ...Jesus Christ. If that's the only trouble they've been in that's nothing. Are you one of those right wing christain southern baptist types that think the wine Jesus made was actually grape juice? Al Gore's son just got sentenced for drug problems...does that mean he is a bad parent? I think you should look more at how they handle the problems (the parents) than the actual problems. Edited February 4, 2004 by Rodchester Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.